dagblog - Comments for "Supreme Court upholds Trump travel ban"

Found interesting @ NYTimes

artappraiser — Wed, 27 Jun 2018 01:54:57 +0000

In reply to Supreme Court upholds Trump travel ban

Found interesting @ NYTimes.com:

Sonia Sotomayor Delivers Fiery Dissent Over Ruling

By Catie Edmondson 24 minutes ago

Justice Sotomayor condemned the decision as “harrowing” and “motivated by hostility and animus toward the Muslim faith.”

The Court Ruled Correctly on the Travel Ban

Now it’s up to Congress to constrain the president’s unilateral power.

By Peter H. Schuck, June 26

Mr. Schuck is an emeritus professor of law at Yale

damn helpful tweets:

artappraiser — Tue, 26 Jun 2018 19:59:35 +0000

In reply to Supreme Court upholds Trump travel ban

damn helpful tweets:

The Supreme Court seems to have ruled that what Trump says about his policies doesn't really matter as long as his lawyers can clean it up on appeal.
I wasn't sure it was possible to infantilize the president while also expanding his powers, but there you go.
— Nick Confessore (@nickconfessore) June 26, 2018

In short, SCOTUS rules they will take Trump seriously, but not literally: https://t.co/mkxEJUGiYN
— Garance Franke-Ruta (@thegarance) June 26, 2018

@ Bloomberg.com:

artappraiser — Tue, 26 Jun 2018 19:27:42 +0000

In reply to Supreme Court upholds Trump travel ban

@ Bloomberg.com:

Noah Feldman: Supreme Court's Travel Ban Decision Will Live in Infamy

Cass Sunstein: Four Things to Know About the Travel Ban Opinions

@ NewYorker.com:

Amy Davidson Sorkin: One Really Good Thing in the Supreme Court’s Travel-Ban Ruling: Korematsu Is Gone

For the Americans of Japanese ancestry who were interned during the Second World War, the Court’s overruling of Korematsu v. United States, from 1944, is a small, late measure of justice.

@ Slate.com:

Richard L. Hasen: Did Justice Anthony Kennedy Just Signal His Retirement?

The depressing defeatism of Kennedy’s work this term indicates his time on the court could be coming to an end.