dagblog - Comments for "Five highlights from the tense Wray-Rosenstein hearing" http://dagblog.com/link/five-highlights-tense-wray-rosenstein-hearing-25455 Comments for "Five highlights from the tense Wray-Rosenstein hearing" en Collusion? GOP & Duma get a http://dagblog.com/comment/254742#comment-254742 <a id="comment-254742"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/254741#comment-254741">‘A little steel in the spine’</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Collusion? GOP &amp; Duma get a room in Berlin, rough riding through sanctions. It's obvious that the bar for treason has gotten much higher, since half the GOP is now compromised by cooperating in an ongoing plot.</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>US Politicians initiated and met today w State Duma Dep Speaker Tolstoy and a Russian delegation in Berlin for a closed session. They were issued an invitation to Russia<br /><br /> Lifting of sanctions was one of the topics discussed<br /><br /> So far I only know that Rep. Chris Smith- NJ was there <a href="https://t.co/Iwn1BAkOUI">pic.twitter.com/Iwn1BAkOUI</a></p> — Olga Lautman (@olgaNYC1211) <a href="https://twitter.com/olgaNYC1211/status/1015763584905809920?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 8, 2018</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 08 Jul 2018 09:33:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 254742 at http://dagblog.com ‘A little steel in the spine’ http://dagblog.com/comment/254741#comment-254741 <a id="comment-254741"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/five-highlights-tense-wray-rosenstein-hearing-25455">Five highlights from the tense Wray-Rosenstein hearing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/a-little-steel-in-the-spine-rod-rosenstein-facing-mounting-criticism-from-congress-is-starting-to-fight-back/2018/07/06/985ec1ca-805d-11e8-b660-4d0f9f0351f1_story.html?utm_term=.07dbfb36d28d">‘A little steel in the spine’: Rod Rosenstein, facing mounting criticism from Congress, is starting to fight back</a></p> <p>By Mark Zapotowsky &amp; Karoun Demerjian @ WashingtonPost.com, July 7</p> <blockquote> <p>As lawmakers took breaks during a tense congressional hearing last week to vote on a resolution meant to shame him, Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein casually worked the room, chatting up reporters and photographers who had come to hear his testimony and shaking the hands of GOP congressmen who had just voted to censure him.</p> <p>[....] Those who work for Rosenstein know any day could be their boss’s last.</p> <p>But in more than 14 months on the job, the former Maryland U.S. attorney seems to be getting used to the constant controversy and criticism that comes from overseeing Mueller. Rather than walking on eggshells, he’s starting to fight back [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sun, 08 Jul 2018 09:30:35 +0000 artappraiser comment 254741 at http://dagblog.com The following story on http://dagblog.com/comment/254382#comment-254382 <a id="comment-254382"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/five-highlights-tense-wray-rosenstein-hearing-25455">Five highlights from the tense Wray-Rosenstein hearing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The following story on Rosenstein is<em> according to four people familiar with his outbursts, </em>which makes me wonder who those four people are and what they are up to saying this to the NYT the day after the testimony</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Publicly Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein stands by his role in Comey firing. In private it’s been a different story. W/<a href="https://twitter.com/adamgoldmanNYT?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@adamgoldmanNYT</a> <a href="https://t.co/jt0amRcgWK">https://t.co/jt0amRcgWK</a></p> — Michael S. Schmidt (@nytmike) <a href="https://twitter.com/nytmike/status/1012782346922229761?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 29, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 Jun 2018 21:42:27 +0000 artappraiser comment 254382 at http://dagblog.com It's also an example of what http://dagblog.com/comment/254331#comment-254331 <a id="comment-254331"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/254330#comment-254330">Yeah, great clip, thank you.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's also an example of what it takes to be in his shoes right now.  He could obviously barely control his anger at Jay Johnson (who is a tool, let's face it), yet I think he did a marvelous job.  Can't imagine this makes him more inclined to help those inclined to impede Mueller.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 Jun 2018 01:27:35 +0000 barefooted comment 254331 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, great clip, thank you. http://dagblog.com/comment/254330#comment-254330 <a id="comment-254330"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/254327#comment-254327">The video that accompanies</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, great clip, thank you. Is helpful to hear him talk this way, in response, rather than just doing talking points announcements, like you point out, gives a better sense of his attitude, where he's at.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 Jun 2018 01:18:45 +0000 artappraiser comment 254330 at http://dagblog.com The video that accompanies http://dagblog.com/comment/254327#comment-254327 <a id="comment-254327"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/five-highlights-tense-wray-rosenstein-hearing-25455">Five highlights from the tense Wray-Rosenstein hearing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The video that accompanies<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/06/28/rod-j-rosenstein-shuts-down-jim-jordan-over-fox-news-report/?noredirect=on&amp;utm_term=.1763a041da42"> this piece</a> is priceless - not only has Rosenstein obviously just had it with the Republicans, he's also not about to back down ...</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 Jun 2018 01:04:54 +0000 barefooted comment 254327 at http://dagblog.com Politico: House GOP rips http://dagblog.com/comment/254321#comment-254321 <a id="comment-254321"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/five-highlights-tense-wray-rosenstein-hearing-25455">Five highlights from the tense Wray-Rosenstein hearing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Politico: <a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/28/house-gop-attack-justice-department-680780">House GOP rips Rosenstein to his face</a></p> <p><em>It was the culmination of months of intensifying conflict between House Republicans and the Justice Department, which has refused to hand over reams of documents officials say are highly sensitive.</em></p> <p>Updated 06/28/2018 01:40 PM EDT</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:23:52 +0000 artappraiser comment 254321 at http://dagblog.com