dagblog - Comments for "Kareem: eyes on the prize" http://dagblog.com/link/kareem-eyes-prize-25497 Comments for "Kareem: eyes on the prize" en I've lost track. http://dagblog.com/comment/254736#comment-254736 <a id="comment-254736"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/254715#comment-254715">So who is talking about</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I've lost track.<br /><br /> Has NYT done as many stories on Dersh being shunned on Martha's Vineyard as they have on the aftermath of Maria in Puerto Rico?<br /><br /> Or not quite yet?</p> — emptywheel (@emptywheel) <a href="https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1015688234934915073?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 7, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 08 Jul 2018 05:28:19 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 254736 at http://dagblog.com You were the one who made http://dagblog.com/comment/254718#comment-254718 <a id="comment-254718"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/254716#comment-254716">You focus more on attacking</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You were the one who made comments about outreach to blacks who were threatening not to vote.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jul 2018 16:36:02 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 254718 at http://dagblog.com Schumer and Pelosi were http://dagblog.com/comment/254717#comment-254717 <a id="comment-254717"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/254715#comment-254715">So who is talking about</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Schumer and Pelosi were talking about civility that it why they criticized Maxine Waters. In return, they received pushback from black activists.</p> <p><a href="https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2018/07/05/nearly-200-black-women-blast-schumer-and-pelosi-for-failing-to-protect-rep-maxine-waters-from-attacks/">https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2018/07/05/nearly-200-black-women-blast-schumer-and-pelosi-for-failing-to-protect-rep-maxine-waters-from-attacks/</a></p> <p>Schumer and Pelosi are among those willing to give the media fodder for the media incivility argument.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jul 2018 16:34:09 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 254717 at http://dagblog.com You focus more on attacking http://dagblog.com/comment/254716#comment-254716 <a id="comment-254716"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/254706#comment-254706">The civility argument is a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>You focus more on attacking Liberals and Democrats</em></p> <p>Not at all. I will admit I have focused on criticizing just one self-described liberal Democrat: you. Because you constantly argue against straw men, which means you don't try to improve communication with others. You constantly change the subject of any discussion to what you want to preach about, setting up straw men to do it with. I think if you came to my door to do "outreach", I would be really turned off, as you wouldn't be listening to my concerns and showing interest in discussion, but talking about what you wanted to talk about and giving me a list of what I needed to do for you.</p> <p>And how is it a "unity, everyone get out and vote Dem" argument to complain about the Democratic leadership being out of touch? Certainly sounds like you don't like the Dem party as it is, constantly sounds like it, as a matter of fact.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jul 2018 16:21:23 +0000 artappraiser comment 254716 at http://dagblog.com So who is talking about http://dagblog.com/comment/254715#comment-254715 <a id="comment-254715"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/254714#comment-254714">The civility argument is that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So who is talking about civility?</p> <p><em>....This is not a plea for civility...</em></p> <p>~ Kareem Abdul Jabbar,<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/03/donald-trump-activism-sarah-sanders-civility-hope"> "Trump's opponents have the moral high-ground. Let's not squander it"</a></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jul 2018 16:08:17 +0000 artappraiser comment 254715 at http://dagblog.com The civility argument is that http://dagblog.com/comment/254714#comment-254714 <a id="comment-254714"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/254710#comment-254710">Well, my Dad voted for Obama</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The civility argument is that incivility will chase away voters. According to this theory, voters care more about civility than they do about racism, misogyny, and kidnapping babies. All we need to do to make these voters Democrats is to be civil and craft a non- identity politics message. What this message will be as the stock market rises and unemployment remains low is unclear.</p> <p>The civility doesn’t matter argument is that more voters are angry about Trump racism, misogyny, kidnapping, etc. than they are about incivility They are angry that Schumer and Pelosi show weakness and criticize Maxine Waters. I believe that this is the larger group. They want to see strength from Democrats and are willing to black strength at the polls.</p> <p>I see no evidence that civility draws more voters than it loses.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jul 2018 15:58:41 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 254714 at http://dagblog.com Well, my Dad voted for Obama http://dagblog.com/comment/254710#comment-254710 <a id="comment-254710"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/254709#comment-254709">The base that didn’t turn out</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, my Dad voted for Obama but I think he as dead by the time Hillary ran. I should jump to all sorts of conclusions about that.<br /> Gonna take the plunge into Netflix's "Dear White People" - going for my 2nd MBA.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jul 2018 15:28:21 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 254710 at http://dagblog.com The base that didn’t turn out http://dagblog.com/comment/254709#comment-254709 <a id="comment-254709"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/254707#comment-254707">All ur base&#039;s r belong 2 us.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The base that didn’t turn out for Hillary.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jul 2018 14:16:37 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 254709 at http://dagblog.com All ur base's r belong 2 us. http://dagblog.com/comment/254707#comment-254707 <a id="comment-254707"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/254706#comment-254706">The civility argument is a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>All ur base's r belong 2 us. Who is this base of which you speak? I heard similar presumptions 2 years ago.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jul 2018 13:07:35 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 254707 at http://dagblog.com The civility argument is a http://dagblog.com/comment/254706#comment-254706 <a id="comment-254706"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/254684#comment-254684">Try to keep up. That was the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The civility argument is a distraction.</p> <p>Most conversations between Liberals and Conservatives in the real world are cordial.</p> <p>I work to get out the vote.</p> <p>Democratic leadership is out of touch with the base</p> <p>The base sees Schumer and Pelosi as weak</p> <p>The base feels that criticizing Maxine Waters was not wise.</p> <p>The base realizes that Pruitt’s replacement will be worse</p> <p>The Supreme Court appointment is a lost cause.</p> <p>We are still imprisoning immigrant families.</p> <p>You focus more on attacking Liberals and Democrats than doing outreach to communities Democrats need to win elections. We need outreach to a wide range of voters, whether they are currently enthusiastic or not. You are willing to ignore potential voters. The civility argument is a distraction.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jul 2018 12:55:02 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 254706 at http://dagblog.com