dagblog - Comments for "Trump Lawyers’ Sudden Realization: They Don’t Know What Don McGahn Told Mueller’s Team" http://dagblog.com/link/trump-lawyers-sudden-realization-they-don-t-know-what-don-mcgahn-told-mueller-s-team-25918 Comments for "Trump Lawyers’ Sudden Realization: They Don’t Know What Don McGahn Told Mueller’s Team" en The Hill on Grassley's reply http://dagblog.com/comment/257125#comment-257125 <a id="comment-257125"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/257121#comment-257121">Wow!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Hill on Grassley's reply tweet (and also one from Kellyanne's hubb):</p> <p><a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/404162-grassley-to-trump-you-cant-let-mcgahn-leave">Grassley to Trump: You can't let McGahn leave</a></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 29 Aug 2018 20:53:18 +0000 artappraiser comment 257125 at http://dagblog.com Wow! http://dagblog.com/comment/257121#comment-257121 <a id="comment-257121"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/257095#comment-257095">The president confirms Axios’</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wow!</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> I hope it’s not true McGahn is leaving WhiteHouse Counsel. U can’t let that happen</p> — ChuckGrassley (@ChuckGrassley) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley/status/1034816254543052803?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 29, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 29 Aug 2018 20:46:15 +0000 artappraiser comment 257121 at http://dagblog.com McGahn did not know about http://dagblog.com/comment/257120#comment-257120 <a id="comment-257120"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/257095#comment-257095">The president confirms Axios’</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">McGahn did not know about Trump's tweet before it was sent and had not previously discussed his departure plans with POTUS, though it was open secret in the WH. He was surprised, though attitude was "of course it happened this way." <a href="https://t.co/csLnGJ4agm">https://t.co/csLnGJ4agm</a></p> — Rosalind Helderman (@PostRoz) <a href="https://twitter.com/PostRoz/status/1034824524607488000?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 29, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 29 Aug 2018 20:44:46 +0000 artappraiser comment 257120 at http://dagblog.com McGahn believes Kushner and http://dagblog.com/comment/257119#comment-257119 <a id="comment-257119"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/257095#comment-257095">The president confirms Axios’</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">McGahn believes Kushner and Ivanka helped push out news about him to force his hand, ppl close to him say. Ivanka Trump complained bitterly to her father about Times story on McGahn intvu w Mueller a few weeks back, per people briefed <a href="https://t.co/1NuiJmVouH">https://t.co/1NuiJmVouH</a></p> — Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) <a href="https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1034897421795508224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 29, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 29 Aug 2018 20:37:01 +0000 artappraiser comment 257119 at http://dagblog.com The president confirms Axios’ http://dagblog.com/comment/257095#comment-257095 <a id="comment-257095"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/trump-lawyers-sudden-realization-they-don-t-know-what-don-mcgahn-told-mueller-s-team-25918">Trump Lawyers’ Sudden Realization: They Don’t Know What Don McGahn Told Mueller’s Team</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The president confirms Axios’ report this morning. <a href="https://t.co/F2oitYtHTb">https://t.co/F2oitYtHTb</a></p> — Jonathan Swan (@jonathanvswan) <a href="https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/1034811090545397760?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 29, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:19:20 +0000 artappraiser comment 257095 at http://dagblog.com yeah, was nearly lol on the http://dagblog.com/comment/256570#comment-256570 <a id="comment-256570"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/256566#comment-256566">Perhaps inevitable but I&#039;m</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>yeah, was nearly lol on the last! (always good to see ya comment, Flav.)</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 21 Aug 2018 04:41:59 +0000 artappraiser comment 256570 at http://dagblog.com Perhaps inevitable but I'm http://dagblog.com/comment/256566#comment-256566 <a id="comment-256566"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/256555#comment-256555">Thanks for sharing the video.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Perhaps inevitable but interesting   the extent to which this thread exemplifies the old joke:</p> <blockquote> <p>Well I've talked too much about myself, time for something new. What do <u>you</u> think about me?</p> </blockquote> <p>Probably fitting given Maggie's subject . In both meanings of the term.</p> <p>What I (ah, finally) was struck by was  the anecdote about Trump remarking to some reporters  that he was disappointed by something  subordinate A had done. The reporters reported  that. And various WH people complained that this reporting  itself would get A in trouble.</p> <p>The press :</p> <blockquote> <p>But all we did was print what Trump said.</p> </blockquote> <p>The  WH people:</p> <blockquote> <p>But when he reads it , it will become more real to him.,</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Tue, 21 Aug 2018 04:07:15 +0000 Flavius comment 256566 at http://dagblog.com What struck me about the http://dagblog.com/comment/256561#comment-256561 <a id="comment-256561"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/256556#comment-256556">The video is not telling us</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>What struck me about the presentation is that she is exhausted by the process and wants the listener to understand just one thing. The character, motivations driving the POTUS,  and why they are shoved into our face, are exactly what they appear to be.</em></p> <p>I don't mean to come across as anti-Maggie.  But what's the difference between her remarks then and her reporting now? </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 21 Aug 2018 01:20:52 +0000 barefooted comment 256561 at http://dagblog.com It's not a moral question for http://dagblog.com/comment/256560#comment-256560 <a id="comment-256560"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/256557#comment-256557">I think she is sick and tired</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>It's not a moral question for me to continue to work in those areas, though, just a monetary one.</em></p> <p>As, I believe, it is for Haberman.  She's writing and talking about Trump, while being paid to do so.  She is a favorite of his  - good and bad - which ups her stead.  The very fact that she has covered him for so long lends her credence when she writes/talks about him.  Consider this: if given the choice, would she give up the beat?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 21 Aug 2018 01:16:36 +0000 barefooted comment 256560 at http://dagblog.com I think she is sick and tired http://dagblog.com/comment/256557#comment-256557 <a id="comment-256557"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/256556#comment-256556">The video is not telling us</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think she is sick and tired of him and disgusted by him after being inside his head for so many years and would love to be on another beat--would love a divorce as it were. I sense that she never wanted to be an expert in all things Donald Trump, but-sigh-ended up that. And now feels since she has the experience and he is so dangerous as president that it's the right thing to do to continue, like not getting a divorce because you're staying for the children</p> <p>I recognize the syndrome because at my age there are some things I have become very expert at that now bore me to tears and I probably affect that weary tone when speaking on them, it's either that or get real sarcastic. I'm sure I'm not the only one here like that, it's a common thing among news junkies, I find. It's not a moral question for me to continue to work in those areas, though, just a monetary one.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:55:24 +0000 artappraiser comment 256557 at http://dagblog.com