dagblog - Comments for "Watcha got in yur pockets, Mrs. Baggins?" http://dagblog.com/link/watcha-got-yur-pockets-mrs-baggins-26067 Comments for "Watcha got in yur pockets, Mrs. Baggins?" en Seeing it pointed out reminds http://dagblog.com/comment/257442#comment-257442 <a id="comment-257442"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/watcha-got-yur-pockets-mrs-baggins-26067">Watcha got in yur pockets, Mrs. Baggins?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Seeing it pointed out reminds me of how much energy I spend  looking for clothes with pockets.</p> <p>Especially since I buy cheap clothes at thrifts and knock off stores and online, I am always always always looking and checking: do any of these have pockets? Can't tell you how many times I have had to ask a male ebay seller: <em>but does it have pockets? I can't tell from the photo and you don't say.</em>  If not, I don't want it. I know other women feel the same. It really is a mystery why producers do not adjust to the need. The only thing I can think of is that younger women without a wardrobe built over decades might not have the luxury of being so choosy and when they need something for a specific event or trip or replacement, just buy it even though they know the lack of pockets on that jacket or those jeans will eventually drive them mad.</p> <p>At this point in time, it's just plain stupid of manufacturers.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 04 Sep 2018 18:58:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 257442 at http://dagblog.com