dagblog - Comments for "Kavanaugh&#039;s Miranda warning: guilty of perjury!" http://dagblog.com/link/kavs-mirand-warning-guilty-perjury-26111 Comments for "Kavanaugh's Miranda warning: guilty of perjury!" en The GOP establishment knows http://dagblog.com/comment/257709#comment-257709 <a id="comment-257709"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/257707#comment-257707">Actually 2 different things,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The GOP establishment knows it, too. This <a href="https://crooksandliars.com/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-breitbart-judiciary">Sept 6 op-ed @ Crooks and Liars</a> which opines this </p> <blockquote> <p>Kavanaugh seems to be the Republican Party's <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/style/1983/08/07/zelig/ddfe75e9-d864-48c0-a2bb-82f572d3f9a0/?utm_term=.aebe0458744a">Zelig</a>, appearing in the background at every momentous turn and violation of norms that the Republican Party has steadily pursued in the name of power.</p> </blockquote> <p> points out this <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/07/us/politics/trump-mcconnell-supreme-court.html">NYTimes article of July 7 by Haberman and Martin</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader, told President Trump this past week that Judges Raymond M. Kethledge and Thomas M. Hardiman presented the fewest obvious obstacles to being confirmed to replace Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, according to Republican officials briefed on the conversation.</p> <p>While careful not to directly make the case for any would-be justice, Mr. McConnell made clear in multiple phone calls with Mr. Trump and the White House counsel, Donald F. McGahn II, that the lengthy paper trail of another top contender, Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, would pose difficulties for his confirmation [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Sep 2018 12:11:36 +0000 artappraiser comment 257709 at http://dagblog.com Actually 2 different things, http://dagblog.com/comment/257707#comment-257707 <a id="comment-257707"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/257686#comment-257686">oops I see now that you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Actually 2 different things, and Anita/Clarence Thomas makes 3. Kavanaugh is so deep up the colon, he's like a permanent lodge in the deep state.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Sep 2018 05:13:14 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 257707 at http://dagblog.com I saw that, and read it.  http://dagblog.com/comment/257694#comment-257694 <a id="comment-257694"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/257693#comment-257693">the pic link is it,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I saw that, and read it.  Just can't find it as a news piece anywhere ...</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Sep 2018 00:01:26 +0000 barefooted comment 257694 at http://dagblog.com the pic link is it, http://dagblog.com/comment/257693#comment-257693 <a id="comment-257693"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/257691#comment-257691">Where is it breaking?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>the pic link is it, apparently a press release from the group, Democracy Coalition, a super PAC, that already filed with the DOJ and it also says they will be filing similar on Monday to the Clerk for DC Circuit court/Merrick Garland</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 08 Sep 2018 23:53:32 +0000 artappraiser comment 257693 at http://dagblog.com Where is it breaking? http://dagblog.com/comment/257691#comment-257691 <a id="comment-257691"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/257688#comment-257688">BREAKING: A criminal</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Where is it breaking?</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 08 Sep 2018 23:44:24 +0000 barefooted comment 257691 at http://dagblog.com Liberal groups urge Dems to http://dagblog.com/comment/257690#comment-257690 <a id="comment-257690"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/257688#comment-257688">BREAKING: A criminal</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/07/perjury-kavanaugh-liberal-groups-811254" target="_top">Liberal groups urge Dems to seek perjury probe of Kavanaugh</a></p> <p>and</p> <p><a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/07/harris-booker-kavanaugh-supreme-court-810654" target="_top">Harris and Booker borrow Trump's tactics in Supreme Court fracas</a></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 08 Sep 2018 23:38:43 +0000 artappraiser comment 257690 at http://dagblog.com BREAKING: A criminal http://dagblog.com/comment/257688#comment-257688 <a id="comment-257688"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/kavs-mirand-warning-guilty-perjury-26111">Kavanaugh&#039;s Miranda warning: guilty of perjury!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>BREAKING: A criminal complaint and judicial ethics complaint are being filed against Kavanaugh for perjury in Congressional testimony — and LOOK WHO’S REVIEWING IT!<br /><br /> Happy Saturday, everyone!<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MerrickGarland?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MerrickGarland</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CancelKavanaugh?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#CancelKavanaugh</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/StopKavanaugh?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#StopKavanaugh</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BlockBrett?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BlockBrett</a> <a href="https://t.co/fpZhqrz6QX">pic.twitter.com/fpZhqrz6QX</a></p> — Kristin Mink (@KristinMinkDC) <a href="https://twitter.com/KristinMinkDC/status/1038396317830193153?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 8, 2018</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Sat, 08 Sep 2018 23:23:47 +0000 artappraiser comment 257688 at http://dagblog.com oops I see now that you http://dagblog.com/comment/257686#comment-257686 <a id="comment-257686"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/257684#comment-257684">there couldn&#039;t be a more</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>oops I see now that you separately posted Brock's essay a few posts down, <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/brock-kav-part-cabal-paula-jones-back-channel-starr-26109">here</a>. Sorry, too many Kavanaugh threads...</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 08 Sep 2018 22:38:25 +0000 artappraiser comment 257686 at http://dagblog.com a reminder that before he http://dagblog.com/comment/257685#comment-257685 <a id="comment-257685"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/257684#comment-257684">there couldn&#039;t be a more</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>a reminder that before he converted from right-wing conservatism,<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_American_Spectator#1990s"> Brock was a major part of smearing Anita Hill so that Clarence Thomas could become a Supreme and then moved on to helping out the allout attack on the Clintons, to bring them down any way they could.</a> He knows the whole shtick and everyone involved in it. And he cares very much about his rep for honesty and even handedness now, so much so that he would never say the same thing about an honest conservative. He basically forbade the smearing profession once and for all, that is why he founded Media Matters, to expose and decode smearing.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 08 Sep 2018 22:31:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 257685 at http://dagblog.com there couldn't be a more http://dagblog.com/comment/257684#comment-257684 <a id="comment-257684"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/kavs-mirand-warning-guilty-perjury-26111">Kavanaugh&#039;s Miranda warning: guilty of perjury!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>there couldn't be a more damning accusation than this, Brock is basically suggesting that he was a full fledged member of what Hillary described as "the vast right wing conspiracy" of which Brock was once also a part:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I used to know Brett Kavanaugh pretty well from my days as a conservative. ⁰⁰<br /> Anyone who thinks he’ll be an independent and fair judge is sorely mistaken—he’ll work for the Republican party, not the American people. The Senate should vote no. <a href="https://t.co/tNlsCO8HVy">https://t.co/tNlsCO8HVy</a></p> — David Brock (@davidbrockdc) <a href="https://twitter.com/davidbrockdc/status/1038456346277031938?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 8, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 08 Sep 2018 22:22:44 +0000 artappraiser comment 257684 at http://dagblog.com