dagblog - Comments for "Kavanaugh could save the Republicans" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/kavanaugh-could-save-republicans-26192 Comments for "Kavanaugh could save the Republicans" en ugh, ain't enough humiliation http://dagblog.com/comment/258719#comment-258719 <a id="comment-258719"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/kavanaugh-could-save-republicans-26192">Kavanaugh could save the Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>ugh, ain't enough humiliation going around, he's got to do it to himself, too</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">He’s so insecure around smart people.</p> — Los Pollos (@RyanHeadley) <a href="https://twitter.com/RyanHeadley/status/1044642263354265600?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/25/trumps-angry-meandering-broadside-against-brett-kavanaughs-accusers-annotated/?utm_term=.67431427b22e">Trump’s angry, meandering broadside against Brett Kavanaugh’s accusers, annotated</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:49:38 +0000 artappraiser comment 258719 at http://dagblog.com Nonpartisan group of 6,000+ http://dagblog.com/comment/258716#comment-258716 <a id="comment-258716"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/kavanaugh-could-save-republicans-26192">Kavanaugh could save the Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>moved <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/dr-ford-should-say-yes-26246#comment-258717">to another thread</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:39:15 +0000 artappraiser comment 258716 at http://dagblog.com odd tidbit http://dagblog.com/comment/258710#comment-258710 <a id="comment-258710"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/kavanaugh-could-save-republicans-26192">Kavanaugh could save the Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>odd tidbit</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Trump had told people shortly after Kennedy retired that he thought McGahn was trying to pull one over on him with Kavanaugh, not because of anything specific but after McConnell voiced concerns about the paper trail. <a href="https://t.co/iDLYpvScg7">https://t.co/iDLYpvScg7</a></p> — Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) <a href="https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1044562706991386625?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:02:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 258710 at http://dagblog.com And why exactly do Democrats http://dagblog.com/comment/258326#comment-258326 <a id="comment-258326"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/258322#comment-258322">Johnathan Turley argued that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And why exactly do Democrats even need "the high ground" when Republicans are eternally taking the low road?<br /> Double standards always.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 16 Sep 2018 20:07:10 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 258326 at http://dagblog.com Well, the shit has officially http://dagblog.com/comment/258314#comment-258314 <a id="comment-258314"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/kavanaugh-could-save-republicans-26192">Kavanaugh could save the Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, the shit has officially hit the fan!  She is speaking out on the record.  I can’t wait for the lynching metaphors.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 16 Sep 2018 20:01:37 +0000 CVille Dem comment 258314 at http://dagblog.com Johnathan Turley argued that http://dagblog.com/comment/258322#comment-258322 <a id="comment-258322"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/258314#comment-258314">Well, the shit has officially</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Johnathan Turley argued that the Democrats lost the high ground by the attack on Kavanugh </p> <p><a href="http://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/406741-democrats-bulldoze-any-remaining-high-ground-with-11th-hour-release-of">http://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/406741-democrats-bulldoze-any-remaining-high-ground-with-11th-hour-release-of</a></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 16 Sep 2018 19:28:32 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 258322 at http://dagblog.com P.S. FWIW, Leslie Wexner just http://dagblog.com/comment/258273#comment-258273 <a id="comment-258273"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/258267#comment-258267">I don&#039;t think so, nope;more</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>P.S. FWIW, big donor<a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/ohios-richest-republican-backer-leslie-wexner-quits-party-after-visit-from-president-obama?ref=home"> Leslie Wexner just officially jumped out of the GOP too.</a> Says he's been GOP since college.Young Republicans. Switching to Independent, i<a href="https://www.newsweek.com/victorias-secret-boss-and-billionaire-donor-les-wexner-renounces-membership-1122630">nspired by Obama-in-person this week, and contrasting him with Trump. </a></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 16 Sep 2018 03:39:03 +0000 artappraiser comment 258273 at http://dagblog.com I don't think so, nope;more http://dagblog.com/comment/258267#comment-258267 <a id="comment-258267"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/kavanaugh-could-save-republicans-26192">Kavanaugh could save the Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't think so, nope;more and more everyday I am convinced it's all gonna be all about Trump:</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Two years ago, Seth Klarman was the biggest donor to the Republican Party in New England. This year he’s giving some $20 million to Democrats. He tells <a href="https://twitter.com/bariweiss?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@bariweiss</a> why in an exclusive interview. <a href="https://t.co/7n1sJMowOG">https://t.co/7n1sJMowOG</a></p> — NYT Opinion (@nytopinion) <a href="https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/1041033612118958080?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2018</a></blockquote> </div> <p>Just like <a href="https://www.cookpolitical.com/analysis/national/national-politics/election-all-about-trump-not-obama">it's not gonna be about Obama</a>, it's not gonna be about Kavanaugh. The GOP in Congress are going to pay and pay and pay and pay for not standing  up to Trump, it's going to take a long time to remake their party somehow. Especially that the people with the money and the neo-cons and the never Trumpers, they don't care much about Kavanaugh one way or another.</p> <p>Edit to add: That said, that's Congressional party, there's plenty of George Will types out there voting Dem this time but ready and able to support a President Pence and a Supreme Court Judge like Kavanaugh. and their originalist conservative agendas once Trump is gone. They're dying off, but they are still out there. And then rank and file voters don't really understand the danger in that to something like abortion rights.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 15 Sep 2018 20:21:33 +0000 artappraiser comment 258267 at http://dagblog.com