dagblog - Comments for "Kavanaugh is a Blatant Liar" http://dagblog.com/link/kavanaugh-blatant-liar-26275 Comments for "Kavanaugh is a Blatant Liar" en Was watching Rachel Maddow http://dagblog.com/comment/258787#comment-258787 <a id="comment-258787"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/kavanaugh-blatant-liar-26275">Kavanaugh is a Blatant Liar</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Was watching Rachel Maddow and Lawrence O'Donnell earlier this week, first time I've done so.  O'Donnell said if you want to know what Brett Kavanaugh looks like when he's lying, just look at the video of the very first words out of his mouth at his initial post-nomination presser.</p> <p>Brett Kavanaugh: "No president has ever consulted more widely or talked to more people from more backgrounds to seek input for a Supreme Court nomination."  <a href="https://twitter.com/axios/status/1016490932324175874">https://twitter.com/axios/status/1016490932324175874</a></p> <p>(apologies if this was already shared at dag a while back)</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:08:14 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 258787 at http://dagblog.com YES! http://dagblog.com/comment/258756#comment-258756 <a id="comment-258756"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/kavanaugh-blatant-liar-26275">Kavanaugh is a Blatant Liar</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>YES!</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:19:54 +0000 Richard Day comment 258756 at http://dagblog.com If you were hiring someone http://dagblog.com/comment/258742#comment-258742 <a id="comment-258742"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/kavanaugh-blatant-liar-26275">Kavanaugh is a Blatant Liar</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If you were hiring someone and allegations of sexual abuse came up, you would have to investigate. The Senate needs to let the FBI look into the allegations. There is no reason to trust that Senate staffers would be unbiased.</p> <p>Edit to add:</p> <p>Democrats on the. Judiciary Committee think Kavanaugh should step down </p> <p><a href="https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/chuck-schumer-brett-kavanaugh-withdraw-nomination_us_5babb418e4b082030e776dbd">https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/chuck-schumer-brett-kavanaugh-withdraw-nomination_us_5babb418e4b082030e776dbd</a></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Sep 2018 20:03:11 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 258742 at http://dagblog.com And another comes forward... http://dagblog.com/comment/258741#comment-258741 <a id="comment-258741"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/258738#comment-258738">Stand by your man... what&#039;s</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em><strong>And another comes forward...</strong></em></p> <p>September 26, 2018 11:47 am</p> <p><img alt="" height="142" src="https://i.imgur.com/mw7fHHi.png" width="173" /></p> <blockquote> <p><strong><a href="https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/avenatti-client-emerges-with-new-allegations-against-kavanaugh">By Kate Riga | TPM</a></strong></p> <p>Julie Swetnick, alleges in a sworn declaration that in 1981 to 1983 she attended house parties with Kavanaugh and Mark Judge, Kavanaugh’s accused accomplice in the alleged attack of Christine Blasey Ford in the early 1980s.</p> <p>Swetnick paints a picture of heavy alcohol consumption and non-consensual sexual activity at the parties, alleging that Kavanaugh drank heavily and acted aggressively towards women present, both in word and action. She claimed that male party attendees participated in “gang rapes,” where they would, in turns, violate a woman who had been incapacitated with spiked drinks. Swetnick said that she herself was a victim of this specific crime, and that Judge and Kavanaugh were “present” when the alleged attack took place.</p> </blockquote> <p>======<br /> ~OGD~</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:01:09 +0000 oldenGoldenDecoy comment 258741 at http://dagblog.com Stand by your man... what's http://dagblog.com/comment/258738#comment-258738 <a id="comment-258738"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/258737#comment-258737">Arty... Ah yes...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>Stand by your man... what's she gonna do, stay home baking cookies?</em> </p> <p>And let me guess - she's pretty goddamn disappointed about thise sexual activities. I don't think the ability of women to soldier on is infinite.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:10:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 258738 at http://dagblog.com Arty... Ah yes... http://dagblog.com/comment/258737#comment-258737 <a id="comment-258737"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/258733#comment-258733">Here&#039;s a BINGO for me. It&#039;s</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><strong>Arty... <em>Ah yes...</em></strong></p> <blockquote> <p><em>What he immediately saw in the Fox News interview: that she's probably far more disappointed that he's lying than problems about sexual activity:</em></p> </blockquote> <p>The look...</p> <p><img alt="" height="120" src="https://i.imgur.com/2UmwWwP.png" width="240" /></p> <p>======<br /> ~OGD~</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Sep 2018 07:54:53 +0000 oldenGoldenDecoy comment 258737 at http://dagblog.com You left out "Judas". [ Aw http://dagblog.com/comment/258736#comment-258736 <a id="comment-258736"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/258733#comment-258733">Here&#039;s a BINGO for me. It&#039;s</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You left out "Judas". [ Aw you've went to the finest school all right, Mr Lonely, but you know you only used to get juiced In it...]</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="320px" width="424px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="320px" mozallowfullscreen="" src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/195142881" webkitallowfullscreen="" width="424px"></iframe> <p height="320px" width="424px"><a href="https://vimeo.com/195142881">DYLAN 'Like A Rolling Stone' (FREE TRADE HALL-MANCHESTER 1966) ...'Judas!'</a> from <a href="https://vimeo.com/user27893161">Dom McGlynn</a> on <a href="https://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p> </div> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Sep 2018 06:13:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 258736 at http://dagblog.com You got it! http://dagblog.com/comment/258735#comment-258735 <a id="comment-258735"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/kavanaugh-blatant-liar-26275">Kavanaugh is a Blatant Liar</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You got it!</p> <p><em><strong>His face frozen</strong></em>....</p> <p>Frat boy in the end.</p> <p>ha</p> <p>Well done!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Sep 2018 05:48:50 +0000 Richard Day comment 258735 at http://dagblog.com Here's a BINGO for me. It's http://dagblog.com/comment/258733#comment-258733 <a id="comment-258733"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/258732#comment-258732">Justice delayed is justice</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here's a BINGO for me. It's the integrity stupids, not the youthful assault or not as the case may be:</p> <p><em> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Not sure if this should be getting the "both sides" treatment. It's pretty obvious that Kavanaugh lied about (or at least severely underplayed to the point of dishonesty) his drinking/partying habits in the Fox News interview. <a href="https://t.co/ZF0caB6Wae">https://t.co/ZF0caB6Wae</a></p> — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1044765285797036032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 26, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </em></p> <p>This is an extended job interview. Big fail already, you lied one way or another. Supreme Court justices do not pander to a constituency nor even with intent to keep a marriage intact. (To be honest: presidents and other electeds can, precisely because they are elected and do not serve a lifetime, the people get to judge their spin and lies.)</p> <p>As to the wife, artist Richard Prince, as much as I dislike much of his body of work, I've got to admit it probably has given him expertise at reading facial expressions. <a href="https://twitter.com/RichardPrince4/status/1044706023284645888">What he immediately saw in the Fox News interview: that she's probably far more disappointed that he's lying than problems about sexual activity:</a></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Sep 2018 05:28:21 +0000 artappraiser comment 258733 at http://dagblog.com Justice delayed is justice http://dagblog.com/comment/258732#comment-258732 <a id="comment-258732"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/258727#comment-258727">Still boggles the mind, the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Justice delayed is justice denied. Mr. Funnyman won't let the reaper walk him out of this one, even if 1 week. Better he's blind, a metaphor for these women drugged, incapacitated, sometimes somewhat aware but scared and unable to move. Got a joke for them now, Bill? Flash that wicked endearing smile.</p> <p>Left out Dennis Hastert, Jordan (or who he was covering for), so many others. Entrusted with the young. Though if it's a boy a few decades back, we're aghast. A girl? Oh she grew up, got used to it, and men/boys have those hormones raging to think of... can't ruin their lives/career.</p> <p>With Hastert however, or w Asia Argento, this blackmail thing can't be rewarded either. W Trump's victims and all these Hollywood cases, the offered hush up money. Other victims held it over their (suspected?) abuser's head. Who's the RNC guy Broidy who paid out $1million+ for an abortion, or abuse, or was it to cover for Trump instead? A rather huge racket. And to think the ones the FBI goes after are the Cisneros and Edwards cases, taking care of an affair, not a rape. Guess they're the easy ones. And yeah, some of Trump's fit this case). Should it have counted as a campaign contribution? Kinda yes, kinda no...</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Sep 2018 04:57:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 258732 at http://dagblog.com