dagblog - Comments for "Elizabeth Warren Falls for Trump’s Trap—and Promotes Insidious Ideas About Race and DNA" http://dagblog.com/link/elizabeth-warren-falls-trump-s-trap-and-promotes-insidious-ideas-about-race-and-dna-26469 Comments for "Elizabeth Warren Falls for Trump’s Trap—and Promotes Insidious Ideas About Race and DNA" en Moderators, Is this not a http://dagblog.com/comment/260270#comment-260270 <a id="comment-260270"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/260269#comment-260269">Art, your lectures are</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Moderators, Is this not a violation of the TOS?</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:34:58 +0000 moat comment 260270 at http://dagblog.com Art, your lectures are http://dagblog.com/comment/260269#comment-260269 <a id="comment-260269"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/260254#comment-260254">I have a very specific reason</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>[Peter - f*** off. Your lectures are 100 times more boring, absurd, insulting &amp;/or repetitive than anything you complain about. Next asinine post like this gets deleted in full. Current one edited down just so passersby can see how useless...- PP]</em></p> <p>Art, your lectures are becoming more didactic, boring, arrogant and inaccurate.... I attack the spittle flecked BS spewing from the snowflake resistance ...Your continuing ego-stroking of someone hiding in the desert from a failed life waiting for a inheritance bailout ....</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Oct 2018 15:53:00 +0000 Anonymous Peter comment 260269 at http://dagblog.com I have a very specific reason http://dagblog.com/comment/260254#comment-260254 <a id="comment-260254"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/260226#comment-260226">Thanks again for proving OK</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I have a very specific reason for feeling like oceankat does, that most of your comments sound idiotic. You defend Trump and the Republican Congress as if they are one and the same and are following some kind of plan together. I see evidence every single day that they are not. I even also see evidence that his own administration is not doing what he says they are doing. Here's just one of today's examples:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">President Trump says Republicans might announce another tax cut before the midterms. But Congress is out of session until the election and party lawmakers don’t seem to know what he’s talking about.<a href="https://t.co/8pXKqIAKy0">https://t.co/8pXKqIAKy0</a></p> — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) <a href="https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1054136862468661248?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 21, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>If you were making a reasonable tax cuts et. al  argument <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/i-m-not-leaving-republican-party-26480">like this guy,</a> I would take it seriously. But you fall for and then push ridiculous Trump demagoguery that is not reality, that is just plain made up stories and lies. You're clearly not interested in reality but in demagoguery, becoming the idiot mark of a con and then serving the con. That is why I ridicule a lot of the things you say, you just don't come off serious and you come off stupid. Look, the guy lies, lies every day, many times, says he's doing stuff he's not doing and vice versa, it's just that simple! Anybody falling for it like there is some kind of program instead of crazytown chaos just looks stupid.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:45:05 +0000 artappraiser comment 260254 at http://dagblog.com Beat egg whites in a copper http://dagblog.com/comment/260250#comment-260250 <a id="comment-260250"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/260246#comment-260246">Conflating general crime and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Beat egg whites in a copper bowl until stiff but not dry.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 21 Oct 2018 21:40:49 +0000 moat comment 260250 at http://dagblog.com Conflating general crime and http://dagblog.com/comment/260246#comment-260246 <a id="comment-260246"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/260240#comment-260240">Well wow, Peter - welcome to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Conflating general crime and punishment in the US with a political inquisition at the highest level of the DOJ is weak and a diversion. The Manafort case was opportunistically dragged into the witch-hunt for a PR display even though there was no connection to the Russian election meddling investigation mandate. You are trying again to use guilt by association in the Manafort/Ukraine scandal to infer a Russian connection. Manafort worked for and was paid by the Ukrainian leader not Putin. Marcy Wheeler at EW tried to sell the snake oil claim that Manafort was being paid by Putin while he worked for free for Trump, total rubbish. Both Podesta brothers are associates of the grifter Clintons and both may be responsible in their Ukraine lobbying scandal.  I just watched an interview with the KSA FM who showed they were taking full responsibility for this tragedy and promising a full investigation wherever the chips may fall. Too many people have already passed judgment on this outrageous act with little clear information only rumor and speculation. I am certain we will never see this type of response from Iran, Russia or China who are the only powers who may benefit from this murder.There are too many people who believe that the KSA should be forced to sit on their hands while an Iran backed Hezbollah like extremist minority group takes over Yemen by force. There are many good reasons to dislike the KSA but even they have the right to intervene to keep thousands of Iranian rockets from being deployed on their southern border.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 21 Oct 2018 21:07:12 +0000 Peter comment 260246 at http://dagblog.com I believe that people who http://dagblog.com/comment/260242#comment-260242 <a id="comment-260242"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/260238#comment-260238">You are wallowing in a dirty</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I believe that people who have not been charged with a crime and have not pleaded guilty to any crime are innocent. I believe that people who have been charged with a crime, can afford and have good legal representation, who then plead guilty to that crime are guilty.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 21 Oct 2018 18:10:11 +0000 ocean-kat comment 260242 at http://dagblog.com You know what, Peter? it http://dagblog.com/comment/260241#comment-260241 <a id="comment-260241"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/260239#comment-260239">Wasn&#039;t there a love-child</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You know what, Peter? it doesn't matter - payoffs are payoffs, for true reasons or not - Trump hid payments during campaign season, so he's guilty of illegal campaign donations. Cohen has been testifying to this. That Mueller hasn't indicted a sitting President while under a bunch of threats to be fired comes as no surprise. But all of the evidence is piling up - Cohen is Mueller's bitch now. Just a matter of time before the next round of more serious indictments, plea bargains, and if needed, trials &amp; convictions.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:57:25 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 260241 at http://dagblog.com Well wow, Peter - welcome to http://dagblog.com/comment/260240#comment-260240 <a id="comment-260240"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/260238#comment-260238">You are wallowing in a dirty</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well wow, Peter - welcome to America's justice system - simple Google tells you "about 90% of cases end in a plea bargain, and of those going to trial, 90% end in a guilty verdict".<br /> So are you going to pull out a new standard of cases "convicted of a crime by jury" to be valid? Presumably you're not this naïve and poorly read, are you? or you think I'm that stupid?<br /> BTW - you have the wrong Podesta - truly, you are getting sloppy. Manafort's Ukraine activity "have nothing to do with Russia"? hitting bizarroland, indeed.<br /> Re: regimes murdering journalists and dissidents, probably Russia is ahead, and China's atrocities in Xinjiang are much much worse in both numbers and kind, but like all these things, you're just lucky if someone notices one - bombing civilians in Yemen has hardly been pretty. But it highlights the danger of having a President who's captured by backroom deals with all these countries, including North Korea. Yet you keep supporting him for some reason. What happened to your 60's idealism and appreciation for *real* go-against-the-flow?</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:52:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 260240 at http://dagblog.com Wasn't there a love-child http://dagblog.com/comment/260239#comment-260239 <a id="comment-260239"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/260237#comment-260237">It&#039;s been well-established</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wasn't there a love-child that verified the relationship in the Edward's scandal? Stormy was selling her accusation for profit without any evidence that it was true. The cheap payoff that she took for her non-disclosure leads me to think she was just a gold digger.  </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:51:36 +0000 Peter comment 260239 at http://dagblog.com You are wallowing in a dirty http://dagblog.com/comment/260238#comment-260238 <a id="comment-260238"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/260232#comment-260232">Trump not convicted, at least</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You are wallowing in a dirty fantasy, PP. Only one of Trump's associates has been convicted of a crime by a jury trial and Manafort's crimes had nothing to do with Trump, his campaign or the Russians. It's ironic that Manafort has been flipped by Mueller and may testify against Podesta if he is tried for his foreign lobbying crimes.  Do you believe that Crooked Hillary should be viewed as guilty by association in this case?  The  outrageous Saudi murder of this journalist is Trump's most challenging FP dilemma so far. The US/Saudi alliance is too  important to allow a complete destruction of relations  The only powers who would benefit would be Iran, Russia and China. but the Saudis must face some punishment even if the King or MBS didn't order the murder. I still think this could have been an attempt to undermine MBS's modernization agenda or a stupid attempt to help MBS by silencing a loud opposition voice.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:33:39 +0000 Peter comment 260238 at http://dagblog.com