dagblog - Comments for "Is Manafort Backtracking?" http://dagblog.com/link/manafort-backtracking-26711 Comments for "Is Manafort Backtracking?" en I guess you're right, I http://dagblog.com/comment/261839#comment-261839 <a id="comment-261839"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/261834#comment-261834">Which instinct? I was</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I guess you're right, I misremembered and didn't re-read (do I get in trouble for that? hah). you're not a genius, as you really were questioning whether the thing was true.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 29 Nov 2018 03:39:31 +0000 artappraiser comment 261839 at http://dagblog.com Which instinct? I was http://dagblog.com/comment/261834#comment-261834 <a id="comment-261834"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/261743#comment-261743">Breaking, your instincts were</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Which instinct? I was thinking about this after the plea agreement news, but I still can't figure out who leaked the noncooperation story.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 29 Nov 2018 01:28:29 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 261834 at http://dagblog.com Vogel just tweeted more: http://dagblog.com/comment/261744#comment-261744 <a id="comment-261744"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/261743#comment-261743">Breaking, your instincts were</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Vogel just tweeted more:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">MANAFORT's lawyers say that he "has provided information to the government in an effort to live up to his cooperation obligations."<br /><br /> The court is now being asked to schedule a sentencing hearing at which the judge can decide whether Manafort cooperated truthfully. <a href="https://t.co/GomgphVMQO">pic.twitter.com/GomgphVMQO</a></p> — Kenneth P. Vogel (@kenvogel) <a href="https://twitter.com/kenvogel/status/1067208477473456129?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 27, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:04:14 +0000 artappraiser comment 261744 at http://dagblog.com Breaking, your instincts were http://dagblog.com/comment/261743#comment-261743 <a id="comment-261743"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/manafort-backtracking-26711">Is Manafort Backtracking?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Breaking on this. Michael, your gut instincts were right</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>NEW: MUELLER accuses MANAFORT of lying during post-plea agreement interviews with the <a href="https://twitter.com/FBI?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@FBI</a> &amp; the special counsel's office "on a variety of subject matters, which constitute breaches of the agreement."<br /><br /> Manafort lawyers dispute, &amp; say "he believes he has provided<br /> truthful info" <a href="https://t.co/yOITPIg17J">pic.twitter.com/yOITPIg17J</a></p> — Kenneth P. Vogel (@kenvogel) <a href="https://twitter.com/kenvogel/status/1067205438914072577?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 26, 2018</a></blockquote> </div> <p><em>Hardball </em>live on MSNBC is covering this right now.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:02:57 +0000 artappraiser comment 261743 at http://dagblog.com Is Mike Pence Loyal? Trump Is http://dagblog.com/comment/261495#comment-261495 <a id="comment-261495"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/261487#comment-261487">Getting the goods on Pence is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>Is Mike Pence Loyal? Trump Is Asking, Despite His Recent Endorsement</em></p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">In recent weeks, Trump has asked aides in one conversation after another a pointed question: Is Mike Pence loyal? Trump has repeated the question so many times that he has alarmed some of his advisers. <a href="https://twitter.com/maggieNYT?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@maggieNYT</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/katierogers?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@katierogers</a> <a href="https://t.co/DXqD1VuTeP">https://t.co/DXqD1VuTeP</a></p> — Peter Baker (@peterbakernyt) <a href="https://twitter.com/peterbakernyt/status/1063503864652054533?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 16, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 16 Nov 2018 20:05:30 +0000 artappraiser comment 261495 at http://dagblog.com Pelosi, presumably (tho http://dagblog.com/comment/261490#comment-261490 <a id="comment-261490"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/261488#comment-261488">If Trump and Pence were</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Pelosi, presumably (tho technically AFAIK the House impeaches, the Senate then holds trial).</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:01:15 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 261490 at http://dagblog.com If Trump and Pence were http://dagblog.com/comment/261488#comment-261488 <a id="comment-261488"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/261487#comment-261487">Getting the goods on Pence is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If Trump and Pence were impeached you know who would be next in line now don't you? It would take irrefutable evidence of major crimes for the senate to impeach. Almost impossible.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 16 Nov 2018 08:35:29 +0000 ocean-kat comment 261488 at http://dagblog.com Getting the goods on Pence is http://dagblog.com/comment/261487#comment-261487 <a id="comment-261487"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/261484#comment-261484">Seth Abramson is skeptical</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Getting the goods on Pence is critical - replacing Trump with that snake would not be a huge win - all the collusion pieces would stay in place for another 2 years.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 16 Nov 2018 08:13:21 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 261487 at http://dagblog.com Seth Abramson is skeptical http://dagblog.com/comment/261484#comment-261484 <a id="comment-261484"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/manafort-backtracking-26711">Is Manafort Backtracking?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Seth Abramson is<a href="https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1063298506062995456"> skeptical about the ABC Manafort story "from a week ago" in this 7-tweet thread</a> posted 2 hrs. ago.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 16 Nov 2018 07:44:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 261484 at http://dagblog.com I basically agree, was just http://dagblog.com/comment/261415#comment-261415 <a id="comment-261415"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/261406#comment-261406">On the other hand, Fitton</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I basically agree, was just wild speculation. Because: puzzling, as you say.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 12 Nov 2018 08:56:33 +0000 artappraiser comment 261415 at http://dagblog.com