dagblog - Comments for "GM Owes the Country an Apology and at least $11.2 Billion" http://dagblog.com/gm-owes-country-and-apology-and-least-112-billion-26857 Comments for "GM Owes the Country an Apology and at least $11.2 Billion" en I'd expect that in summer of http://dagblog.com/comment/262037#comment-262037 <a id="comment-262037"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/261991#comment-261991">Not saying we shouldn&#039;t have</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'd expect that in summer of 2009 one of team- Obama's objectives was to induce "the market" to  take the wallet out of its pocket  and move some of into the hands of  ,say, auto companies.  For things like starting the line to build  chevys for the fall. Took cash.</p> <blockquote> <p>While TO was saying "go ahead buy GM bonds"   </p> </blockquote> <p> it would have been diluted if  combined with  warnings about the punishments awaiting Waggoner or whomever. Which would have been a message to "Capital"</p> <blockquote> <p>" No sense buying GM bonds tomorrow- might be</p> <p>cheaper next week". </p> </blockquote> <p>"I used to think if there was reincarnation, I wanted to come back as the President, the Pope, or a .400 baseball hitter.</p> <p>But now I want to come back as the bond market. You can intimidate everybody." -- Presidential adviser James C. Carville, quoted in the book "The Agenda" by Bob Woodward</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 04 Dec 2018 04:46:18 +0000 Flavius comment 262037 at http://dagblog.com Not saying we shouldn't have http://dagblog.com/comment/261991#comment-261991 <a id="comment-261991"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/261982#comment-261982">  3.2        25.0</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Not saying we shouldn't have bailed out GM, necessarily.  Saying we should have protected ourselves.  Treasury shouldn't have sold at a loss and Gm shouldn't be laying off US workers now, as if nothing had happened.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 03 Dec 2018 15:24:30 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 261991 at http://dagblog.com   3.2        25.0 http://dagblog.com/comment/261982#comment-261982 <a id="comment-261982"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/gm-owes-country-and-apology-and-least-112-billion-26857">GM Owes the Country an Apology and at least $11.2 Billion</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>  3.2        25.0</p> <p>25.0        16.9</p> <p>10.0          7.8</p> <p>Top numbers:Hoover's Unemployment rate from   taking over until  4 years later</p> <p>Middle: FDR</p> <p>Bottom Obama.Should he have done differently? Nah, it worked .The bottom didn't drop out like Heber Hoover .Had it, , Michael would have had a reasonable case . But it didn't.</p> <p>The first objective of Presidents when employment is tanking surely is "don't make it worse". Obama  didn't . Instead the the Summers /Geithner / Obama policies turned 10% into  7.8 % .</p> <p>And 4.7% over the next 4.</p> <p>Maybe he " wasted" the crisis We'll never know . Or whether trying to capitalize on it</p> <p>would have moored  the economy in the  south. We <u>do</u> know that what Summers etc. and that</p> <p>guy in the White House resulted in 4.7% instead of 25%.</p> <p> </p> <p>  </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 03 Dec 2018 02:20:11 +0000 Flavius comment 261982 at http://dagblog.com