dagblog - Comments for "Roger Stone Invokes Fifth Amendment to Dodge Congressional Committee’s ‘Fishing Expedition’"

Roger Stone was very lucky he

Peter — Wed, 05 Dec 2018 02:38:30 +0000

In reply to From US v Hubbell (2000): pic

Roger Stone was very lucky he found his old text messages that disproved the leaked and modified testimony from his last closed door meeting with the committee. He's wise to resist another closed door round that demands an even wider fishing expedition that would produce more leaks and warping of his words and their meaning in the fake news media. He knows that Mueller is very anxious to frame him by tying him directly to the wikileaks and Assange by any means available.

It would be very entertaining seeing him at an open public hearing with a much more limited scope where he could turn the overanxious fishermen into cut-bate with his sharp and deadly wit.

Wasn't Camille Paglia walled

PeraclesPlease — Wed, 05 Dec 2018 01:15:07 +0000

In reply to Roger Stone Invokes Fifth Amendment to Dodge Congressional Committee’s ‘Fishing Expedition’

Wasn't Camille Paglia walled off in a block of ice at the North Pole for the last 20-30 years?
How's she doing anyway?

From US v Hubbell (2000): pic

artappraiser — Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:42:08 +0000

In reply to Roger Stone Invokes Fifth Amendment to Dodge Congressional Committee’s ‘Fishing Expedition’

From US v Hubbell (2000): pic.twitter.com/KdwnnRxOIc
— Benjamin Wittes (@benjaminwittes) December 4, 2018

There may be what the court has termed testimonial qualities of the act of producing documents, but the documents themselves are not protected by the 5th Amendment.
— Benjamin Wittes (@benjaminwittes) December 4, 2018