dagblog - Comments for "How to dissuade Trump fans? Inform about his dad" http://dagblog.com/link/how-dissuade-trump-fans-inform-about-his-dad-27263 Comments for "How to dissuade Trump fans? Inform about his dad" en Nate Silver was shouting this http://dagblog.com/comment/264160#comment-264160 <a id="comment-264160"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/264055#comment-264055">I found interesting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nate Silver was shouting this morning:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">SHUT DOWN OVER THE WALL AND YOUR APPROVAL RATING FALLS</p> — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1088069636388720642?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 23, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 24 Jan 2019 03:47:41 +0000 artappraiser comment 264160 at http://dagblog.com yeah, seems like it's like http://dagblog.com/comment/264148#comment-264148 <a id="comment-264148"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/264144#comment-264144">And, you know, it was free. I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>yeah, seems like it's <a href="https://twitter.com/DeadlineWH/status/1082763010077310977?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1082763010077310977&amp;ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fdagblog.com%2Freader-blogs%2Ftrump-explains-all-live-chat-27176">like Steve said</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 24 Jan 2019 01:50:47 +0000 artappraiser comment 264148 at http://dagblog.com And, you know, it was free. I http://dagblog.com/comment/264144#comment-264144 <a id="comment-264144"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/264132#comment-264132">Yes it&#039;s does look like his</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And, you know, it was free. I promise you.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:47:26 +0000 moat comment 264144 at http://dagblog.com Yes it's does look like his http://dagblog.com/comment/264132#comment-264132 <a id="comment-264132"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/264055#comment-264055">I found interesting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes it's does look like his approval rating was always about <em>it's the economy stupids, jobs, jobs, jobs</em>. He finally lost them all and is down to rock bottom kookoorokoo 1/3 of the electorate that has always been with us:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">New AP Poll: Overall, 34 percent of Americans approve of Trump’s job performance. That’s down from 42 percent a month earlier and nears the lowest mark of his two-year presidency. <a href="https://t.co/XnNGXdyq1R">https://t.co/XnNGXdyq1R</a></p> — Julie Pace (@jpaceDC) <a href="https://twitter.com/jpaceDC/status/1088185256438652939?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 23, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>What good is a dang wall if it costs 800,000 paychecks with massive collateral damage. I';m willing to bet That 7/8% or so liked the idea of a wall not because they hated the furriners but because the wall was supposedly gonna protect the paychecks and make em go up.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 23 Jan 2019 21:35:38 +0000 artappraiser comment 264132 at http://dagblog.com I found interesting http://dagblog.com/comment/264055#comment-264055 <a id="comment-264055"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/how-dissuade-trump-fans-inform-about-his-dad-27263">How to dissuade Trump fans? Inform about his dad</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I found interesting anecdotals in the WaPo article I cite below as well as reference to the NPR/Marist poll.</p> <p>More and more I see the static approval rating of the last two years, which we news junkies think of as so mysterious, I think it is that the 7% swings that are not hard core 1/3 right wing of the country, for them: the Carville maxim still rules "it's the economy stupid". That's why they approved of his performance. Until now. They are the type of people that not only don't pay much attention to political news, they also are the type that are very cynical, they feel all politicians are crooks and the system is stacked and crooked as well. So the things we have found outrageous about Trump, they think it's just status quo. Until now. It's: go ahead and play your political games but remember it's the economy stupid as long as you do that you're better than most. These are the people that swing the presidential elections, this small swing population. And Carville was right about them and he's still right. Including that health care is usually #2 after the economy if there's no major war going on.</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-voters-now-blame-him-for-the-government-shutdown/2019/01/20/416051de-1b55-11e9-9ebf-c5fed1b7a081_story.html">Some Trump voters now blame him for government shutdown</a></p> <p><em>While the president’s relationship with much of his base remains strong, his ties are fraying with voters in key pockets throughout the industrial Midwest.</em></p> <p>By Matt Viser from MACOMB COUNTY, Mich @ WashingtonPost.com, Jan. 21</p> <blockquote> <p>[....] Many here, even those who still support Trump, say they hold him most responsible. They recite his comment from the Oval Office that he would be “proud to shut down the government.” When he said it, they listened.</p> <p>“It’s silly. It’s destructive,” Daudert said, adding that all he knows about 2020 is that he won’t be supporting Trump. “I was certainly for the anti-status quo . . . I’ll be more status quo next time.” [....]</p> <p>[....] An NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist survey, conducted Jan. 10 to Jan. 13, found that his net approval rating had dropped seven points since December.</p> <p>One of the biggest declines came among suburban men, whose approval rating of Trump fell a net 18 percentage points, while support from evangelicals and Republicans dipped by smaller margins. Among men without a college degree, the downward change was seven points.</p> <p>As Jeremiah Wilburn, a 45-year-old operating engineer, browsed the aisles at Walmart for a new pair of coveralls, he reflected on some of those shifts. Like many voters here, after siding with Barack Obama in two elections, he decided to gamble with Trump in 2016. And for most of the past two years, he was pleased. The economy was humming, jobs were flowing, and wages seemed stable.</p> <p>Until now.</p> <p>“I was doing fine with him up until this government shutdown,” he said. “It’s ridiculous. You’re not getting the wall built for $5 billion. And Mexico is not paying for it, we all know that, too. Meanwhile, it’s starting to turn people like me away.”</p> <p>He worries about the shutdown’s effect on the economy. He’s concerned about the impact on his brother, who works for the TSA in Florida.</p> <p>To him, the shutdown standoff has also poked holes in Trump’s ability to say he cares for the working class, given that 800,000 federal employees and an additional number of contractors are going without paychecks.</p> <p>“You can’t expect people to come to work without getting paid,” Wilburn said. “If I were them, I certainly wouldn’t come to work.” [.....]</p> </blockquote> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 22 Jan 2019 05:15:11 +0000 artappraiser comment 264055 at http://dagblog.com I've told this story before, http://dagblog.com/comment/264030#comment-264030 <a id="comment-264030"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/how-dissuade-trump-fans-inform-about-his-dad-27263">How to dissuade Trump fans? Inform about his dad</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I've told this story before, but in 2016 focus groups, voters absolutely believed what they'd seen on The Apprentice.<br /><br /> A triumph of branding, a tragedy of politics. <a href="https://t.co/89n8j0C55X">https://t.co/89n8j0C55X</a></p> — Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/1087370516657303552?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 21, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:30:08 +0000 artappraiser comment 264030 at http://dagblog.com 153 Latinos polled, so 76 or http://dagblog.com/comment/264007#comment-264007 <a id="comment-264007"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/263987#comment-263987">Too weird, he had 50%</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>153 Latinos polled, so 76 or 77 approve. Even though the Strongly Approve &amp; Approve add up to 50%, most still have no intention of voting for Trump in 2020.<br /> <a href="https://www.latinorebels.com/2019/01/20/potusapproval/">https://www.latinorebels.com/2019/01/20/potusapproval/</a></p> </div></div></div> Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:33:24 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 264007 at http://dagblog.com The Democrats' Hispanic http://dagblog.com/comment/264001#comment-264001 <a id="comment-264001"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/263997#comment-263997">Here is more from that poll,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Democrats' Hispanic problem in FLorida - <a href="https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/12/04/democrats-hispanic-voters-2020-222751">https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/12/04/democrats-hispanic-vo...</a></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 20 Jan 2019 21:11:21 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 264001 at http://dagblog.com this article in Salon gets http://dagblog.com/comment/263999#comment-263999 <a id="comment-263999"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/263991#comment-263991">Quite weird - do we have any</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>this article in Salon gets into some of details on Latino answers, but still doesn't get into the why with the anti immigration thing going on:</p> <p><a href="https://www.salon.com/2019/01/20/trump-boasts-that-latino-voters-are-supporting-him-but-ignores-that-theyd-still-vote-against-him/">Trump boasts that Latinos are supporting him... but ignores that they'd still vote against him</a></p> <p><em>Trump boasted that his support among Latino voters has increased, but ignored that most won't vote for him</em></p> <p>by Matthew Rozsa, Jan. 20</p> <blockquote> <p>[....] Yet the numbers are a little more complicated than they were characterized as being in Trump's boast. The same poll also found that while 27 percent of Latino voters would "definitely vote for President Trump" in 2020, 58 percent would "definitely vote against him." Fifty percent of Latinos also felt that the Trump administration was doing "too little" to work with Democrats in Congress in order to end the shutdown, with only 32 percent saying that they were doing "about the right amount" and only 10 percent saying they were doing "too much." By contrast, 63 percent said that Democrats were doing too little to work with the Trump administration, compared to 17 percent who said they were doing the right amount and eight percent who said they were doing too much. Fifty-five percent said that they like elected officials who can work with people who they disagree with, while only 39 percent said they liked elected officials who "stick to their positions."</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sun, 20 Jan 2019 21:05:40 +0000 artappraiser comment 263999 at http://dagblog.com Here is more from that poll, http://dagblog.com/comment/263997#comment-263997 <a id="comment-263997"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/263987#comment-263987">Too weird, he had 50%</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here is more from that poll, significant drops with other groups:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">"The Marist data for PBS shows a drop of 10 percent in job approval among Republicans and a decline of 11 percent among white evangelicals and 17% among suburban men." <a href="https://t.co/HUKIZ53CuH">https://t.co/HUKIZ53CuH</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/BillKristol?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BillKristol</a></p> — Michael R. Strain (@MichaelRStrain) <a href="https://twitter.com/MichaelRStrain/status/1087086394479136768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 20, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:57:26 +0000 artappraiser comment 263997 at http://dagblog.com