dagblog - Comments for "Striking example of how numbers can &quot;lie&quot;" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/striking-example-how-numbers-can-lie-27343 Comments for "Striking example of how numbers can "lie"" en Most Americans already pay http://dagblog.com/comment/264401#comment-264401 <a id="comment-264401"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/striking-example-how-numbers-can-lie-27343">Striking example of how numbers can &quot;lie&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Most Americans already pay wealth taxes, in fact. Property taxes! That's a wealth tax!<br /><br /> Except rich people hold most of their wealth in stocks instead of houses. Why should middle-class people's wealth be taxed more than rich people's wealth? <a href="https://t.co/Dzp9lofSWY">pic.twitter.com/Dzp9lofSWY</a></p> — Noah Smith (@Noahpinion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Noahpinion/status/1091016615100002306?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 31, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 01 Feb 2019 04:41:51 +0000 artappraiser comment 264401 at http://dagblog.com  Besides the subsequent http://dagblog.com/comment/264336#comment-264336 <a id="comment-264336"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/striking-example-how-numbers-can-lie-27343">Striking example of how numbers can &quot;lie&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> Given  the subsequent impoverishment  chiefly revealed i<u>ts</u> illusory nature, and the apparent wealth of  the over -75s  might seem  less fabulous if ,say,  the richest 2% were isolated - possibly the real conclusion is that  <u>everyone</u> else is poorer since 2008.</p> <p>And always were.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 29 Jan 2019 16:04:48 +0000 Flavius comment 264336 at http://dagblog.com If it makes anyone feel http://dagblog.com/comment/264328#comment-264328 <a id="comment-264328"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/striking-example-how-numbers-can-lie-27343">Striking example of how numbers can &quot;lie&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If it makes anyone feel better, as the chart shows, the old and rich will poorer soon enough. The super old and super rich will be much richer, however. Though likely dead.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:58:29 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 264328 at http://dagblog.com