dagblog - Comments for "2020 Rejects &amp; Remainders" http://dagblog.com/2020-rejects-remainders-27348 Comments for "2020 Rejects & Remainders" en hmmm: target Pence?!? strange http://dagblog.com/comment/266437#comment-266437 <a id="comment-266437"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/2020-rejects-remainders-27348">2020 Rejects &amp; Remainders</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>hmmm: target Pence?!? strange theory....</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The intensity of Pete Buttigieg’s critiques of Pence speaks to a long history, both political and personal—and the young mayor’s deep disdain for hypocrisy, writes <a href="https://twitter.com/scottbix?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@scottbix</a> <a href="https://t.co/HS3j7faqae">https://t.co/HS3j7faqae</a></p> — The Daily Beast (@thedailybeast) <a href="https://twitter.com/thedailybeast/status/1112741428789198849?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 02 Apr 2019 16:53:25 +0000 artappraiser comment 266437 at http://dagblog.com Strikes me as not a bad idea http://dagblog.com/comment/266434#comment-266434 <a id="comment-266434"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/266432#comment-266432">It&#039;s a happy meal...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Strikes me as not a bad idea at all for someone selling happy instead of anger to be a part of the Dem primary crew. I fear "a pox on all your houses" reaction if there's a lot of nastiness within the party.Sassy is OK but I feel they have to offer an alternative to the righteous anger thing. We all know Trumpies anger is more faux than righteous but it's all the same to most people in a "can we just stop the insanity?" kind of way. I know you like the aggressive fighter type but I just have this intuition that it's really going to come down to knowing how to stop feeding trolling and presenting a sunny calming assurance. Daddy or mommy going to make it all better.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 02 Apr 2019 16:37:29 +0000 artappraiser comment 266434 at http://dagblog.com It's a happy meal... http://dagblog.com/comment/266432#comment-266432 <a id="comment-266432"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/2020-rejects-remainders-27348">2020 Rejects &amp; Remainders</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's a happy meal...<br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">“If you get into this race, are you going to run an apology tour and apologize for being a successful white male?”<br /><br /> “No,” <a href="https://twitter.com/TerryMcAuliffe?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TerryMcAuliffe</a> replied. “If I do run, it will be the funnest campaign. It will be a happy tour.”<a href="https://t.co/mwvdKLfBuF">https://t.co/mwvdKLfBuF</a></p> — Ruby Cramer (@rubycramer) <a href="https://twitter.com/rubycramer/status/1113086295658639360?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 2, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 02 Apr 2019 14:55:22 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 266432 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, also getting media or http://dagblog.com/comment/266391#comment-266391 <a id="comment-266391"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265941#comment-265941">NYTimes &quot;Vows&quot; wedding</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, also getting media or Twitter coverage for little snippy comments about Hillary or the Dems, with his whataboutism both-sides-do-it posture - don't quite get it. 37-year-old is a bit know-it-all for me.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 01 Apr 2019 06:59:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 266391 at http://dagblog.com Lying campaign managers, for http://dagblog.com/comment/266380#comment-266380 <a id="comment-266380"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/2020-rejects-remainders-27348">2020 Rejects &amp; Remainders</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Lying campaign managers, for money:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">At least two of these Democratic candidates (<a href="https://twitter.com/Hickenlooper?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Hickenlooper</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/JulianCastro?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JulianCastro</a> are the 2 I’ve caught so far) are misleading voters by claiming they need more donors to reach the debates when they’ve already qualified on the basis of their polling. <a href="https://t.co/0aqmMbHewn">https://t.co/0aqmMbHewn</a></p> — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1112544167010418689?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 01 Apr 2019 02:31:26 +0000 artappraiser comment 266380 at http://dagblog.com deja vus allover agin http://dagblog.com/comment/266361#comment-266361 <a id="comment-266361"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/2020-rejects-remainders-27348">2020 Rejects &amp; Remainders</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>deja vus allover agin</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">scene from O'Rourke's Austin rally going on right now: <a href="https://t.co/n8OyLWQ5KZ">https://t.co/n8OyLWQ5KZ</a></p> — Edward-Isaac Dovere (@IsaacDovere) <a href="https://twitter.com/IsaacDovere/status/1112202032604172293?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 31, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 31 Mar 2019 04:19:28 +0000 artappraiser comment 266361 at http://dagblog.com Yes, that's why I said rough http://dagblog.com/comment/266345#comment-266345 <a id="comment-266345"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/266338#comment-266338">I always thought it was more</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes, that's why I said rough spun. They definitely wanted the lunch pail vibe rather than someone who could be successfully label cerebral or elite. No one like Gore or Kaine.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 30 Mar 2019 20:44:20 +0000 ocean-kat comment 266345 at http://dagblog.com David Cop-a-feel was Bush Sr http://dagblog.com/comment/266340#comment-266340 <a id="comment-266340"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/266338#comment-266338">I always thought it was more</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>David Cop-a-feel was Bush Sr's side of the street. Or maybe it's all a mashup/smashup.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:37:12 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 266340 at http://dagblog.com I always thought it was more http://dagblog.com/comment/266338#comment-266338 <a id="comment-266338"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/266336#comment-266336">Yeah, his 8 years as vp isn&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I got the impression it was more like they were trying to balance Obama's global eliteness. There were lots of white guys and gals they could pick, they picked him because they also needed some sort of lunchpail vibe.</p> <p>Edit to add: also a secondary thing I took note of--Obama was famously "cool" and cerebral, the no drama Obama thing, the intellectual. Joe was a counter to that with touchy feely weepie (even if fake), in trouble for same touching now--the "I feel your pain" thing</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:25:24 +0000 artappraiser comment 266338 at http://dagblog.com Gore was famously stretched http://dagblog.com/comment/266339#comment-266339 <a id="comment-266339"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/266334#comment-266334">Good point.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Gore famously stretched the role of V.P. with Bill's approval and did a damn good job of doing that.  I remember reading very convincing arguments by historians that he was the best V.P. ever. It's not fair to compare in a way,  he had a talent for not losing his gravitas in that job where most do lose it and are humiliated.  That actually came back to bite him, mho, when he was running himself, he was a bit too arrogant towards W in some debates. (And there's the everyman/lunchpail thing creeping in there I mentioned in my other comment about Joe. I don't vote like that, but a lot of people do, like my mother, who had extreme emotional I.Q., an empath, but a high school education. She judged candidates on how they interact with others. Like Alice Roosevelt Longworth's famous comment about Coolidge:<em> He looks as though he's been weaned on a pickle!--</em>that kind of thing.)</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:22:43 +0000 artappraiser comment 266339 at http://dagblog.com