dagblog - Comments for "&quot;The Green New Deal Would Spend the U.S. Into Oblivion&quot;" http://dagblog.com/link/green-new-deal-would-spend-us-oblivion-27423 Comments for ""The Green New Deal Would Spend the U.S. Into Oblivion"" en Res ipsa loquitor: http://dagblog.com/comment/265673#comment-265673 <a id="comment-265673"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/green-new-deal-would-spend-us-oblivion-27423">&quot;The Green New Deal Would Spend the U.S. Into Oblivion&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Res ipsa loquitor:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">“And then, almost as quickly as it had inflated, the green bubble burst. Between January 2008 and January 2009, the percentage of Americans who told the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press that the environment was a “top priority” dropped from 56% to 41%.” <a href="https://t.co/v5yz0i5t5w">https://t.co/v5yz0i5t5w</a></p> — David Wallace-Wells (@dwallacewells) <a href="https://twitter.com/dwallacewells/status/1103732957343150081?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 7, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Mar 2019 21:20:24 +0000 artappraiser comment 265673 at http://dagblog.com Or else it's smart cop/stupid http://dagblog.com/comment/265039#comment-265039 <a id="comment-265039"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265038#comment-265038">The Green New Deal was a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Or else it's smart cop/stupid cop and she moves the goalposts, at which point we can implement something more carerful and thought out, vs having no margin to implement anything (how were Obama's careful climate moves at Doha or wherever? I don't recall any exciting outcomes - lots of "lets not piss off conservatives too much")</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:09:39 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 265039 at http://dagblog.com The Green New Deal was a http://dagblog.com/comment/265038#comment-265038 <a id="comment-265038"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265033#comment-265033">Schumer slams ‘stunt’ Green</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Green New Deal was a stunt. Of course the republicans are going to play along with a stunt of their own. For a while I gave AOC a pass because she's young but it's beginning to look like she's just stupid.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 Feb 2019 07:40:09 +0000 ocean-kat comment 265038 at http://dagblog.com Schumer slams ‘stunt’ Green http://dagblog.com/comment/265033#comment-265033 <a id="comment-265033"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/green-new-deal-would-spend-us-oblivion-27423">&quot;The Green New Deal Would Spend the U.S. Into Oblivion&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/14/schumer-green-new-deal-1175513">Schumer slams ‘stunt’ Green New Deal vote as moderates fret</a></p> <p>By Anthony Adragna @ Politico.com,  02/14/2019 03:01 PM EST</p> <blockquote> <p>Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Democrats would not be intimidated by the “cynical stunt” of voting on the Green New Deal resolution, even as moderate members of his caucus distanced themselves from the sweeping climate change goals.</p> <p>Schumer said the "amazing irony" of Majority Leader Mitch McConnell bringing up a resolution Republicans intend to vote against is a sign of why the American people hate Congress. He demanded the Kentucky Republican acknowledge the scientific consensus around climate change and commit the chamber to tackling the problem [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 Feb 2019 05:33:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 265033 at http://dagblog.com Senate thrilled, gonna vote http://dagblog.com/comment/264976#comment-264976 <a id="comment-264976"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/green-new-deal-would-spend-us-oblivion-27423">&quot;The Green New Deal Would Spend the U.S. Into Oblivion&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Senate thrilled, gonna vote on it:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>It's official: <a href="https://twitter.com/senatemajldr?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@senatemajldr</a> says the Senate will vote on the Green New Deal championed by <a href="https://twitter.com/AOC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AOC</a> . The GOP is almost giddy about the idea of putting Dems on record on these progressive ideas</p> — Rachael Bade (@rachaelmbade) <a href="https://twitter.com/rachaelmbade/status/1095400821548859392?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 12, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> <p>Trump's blather last night about taking away your cars: no coincidence.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:53:18 +0000 artappraiser comment 264976 at http://dagblog.com Reality-based message from http://dagblog.com/comment/264966#comment-264966 <a id="comment-264966"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/green-new-deal-would-spend-us-oblivion-27423">&quot;The Green New Deal Would Spend the U.S. Into Oblivion&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Reality-based message from boots on the ground:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom abandoning plan for high-speed train from Los Angeles to San Francisco, says too costly.</p> — Nick Riccardi (@NickRiccardi) <a href="https://twitter.com/NickRiccardi/status/1095403387858739200?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 12, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 Feb 2019 20:18:26 +0000 artappraiser comment 264966 at http://dagblog.com Lol, 15,6664 comments on this http://dagblog.com/comment/264843#comment-264843 <a id="comment-264843"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/264812#comment-264812">#1 most read story over @</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Lol, 15,664 comments on this article @ The Hill in 14 hrs:  <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/429207-trump-divides-democrats-with-warning-of-creeping-socialism">Trump divides Democrats with warning of creeping socialism</a> Even if the comments are all made by bots, looking like socialism is gonna be<em> the hot button thing </em>for the foreseeable future.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 10 Feb 2019 14:35:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 264843 at http://dagblog.com For the record, Trump's http://dagblog.com/comment/264820#comment-264820 <a id="comment-264820"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/264812#comment-264812">#1 most read story over @</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>For the record, Trump's loving it, though I for one have little faith in his politico chops, I doubt he even understands his own base anymore:</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>I think it is very important for the Democrats to press forward with their Green New Deal. It would be great for the so-called “Carbon Footprint” to permanently eliminate all Planes, Cars, Cows, Oil, Gas &amp; the Military - even if no other country would do the same. Brilliant!</p> — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1094375749279248385?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 9, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> <p>Oddity noted: Sarcasm is a rare tactic for him, probably got it from Fox  News somewhere?</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 10 Feb 2019 01:25:03 +0000 artappraiser comment 264820 at http://dagblog.com Good big picture point from http://dagblog.com/comment/264818#comment-264818 <a id="comment-264818"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/green-new-deal-would-spend-us-oblivion-27423">&quot;The Green New Deal Would Spend the U.S. Into Oblivion&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Good big-picture point from self-identified "unemployed Jewish guy":</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>I'm not prepared to get into the weeds re Green New Deal, but as a general point: you can't make massive, urgently necessary changes to everyone's way of life without also creating true universal safety nets. At least not if you want it to be politically viable! <a href="https://t.co/1lWYF4pHFd">https://t.co/1lWYF4pHFd</a></p> — David Klion (@DavidKlion) <a href="https://twitter.com/DavidKlion/status/1094274923630153728?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 9, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Sun, 10 Feb 2019 00:57:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 264818 at http://dagblog.com More on the "scrubbing" of http://dagblog.com/comment/264816#comment-264816 <a id="comment-264816"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/264809#comment-264809">The saga of the Green New</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>More on the "scrubbing" of the "'splainer":</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Ocasio-Cortez had a detailed “FAQ” explanation of the “Green New Deal” on her website, which NPR reported her office also sent to them directly for their story on the proposal. It has received criticism. She now says it was merely “a draft version that got uploaded + taken down.” <a href="https://t.co/5QvuMByYek">https://t.co/5QvuMByYek</a></p> — Daniel Dale (@ddale8) <a href="https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/1094337153885061120?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 9, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 10 Feb 2019 00:49:39 +0000 artappraiser comment 264816 at http://dagblog.com