dagblog - Comments for "Public Opinion on Single-Payer, National Health Plans, and Expanding Access to Medicare Coverage" http://dagblog.com/link/public-opinion-single-payer-national-health-plans-and-expanding-access-medicare-coverage-27549 Comments for "Public Opinion on Single-Payer, National Health Plans, and Expanding Access to Medicare Coverage" en Nice @ddayen story outlining http://dagblog.com/comment/265346#comment-265346 <a id="comment-265346"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/public-opinion-single-payer-national-health-plans-and-expanding-access-medicare-coverage-27549">Public Opinion on Single-Payer, National Health Plans, and Expanding Access to Medicare Coverage</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Nice <a href="https://twitter.com/ddayen?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ddayen</a> story outlining the holes and weaknesses in Medicare as it is. Though I quibble slightly with the notion that there are not Democrats who wish to fill its gaps. <a href="https://t.co/KqkTmgl1BI">https://t.co/KqkTmgl1BI</a></p> — Margot Sanger-Katz (@sangerkatz) <a href="https://twitter.com/sangerkatz/status/1100820024594452481?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 27, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:18:09 +0000 artappraiser comment 265346 at http://dagblog.com The poll is garbage. Everyone http://dagblog.com/comment/265323#comment-265323 <a id="comment-265323"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/public-opinion-single-payer-national-health-plans-and-expanding-access-medicare-coverage-27549">Public Opinion on Single-Payer, National Health Plans, and Expanding Access to Medicare Coverage</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The poll is garbage. Everyone has their own definition of what Medicare for all means. The moment you explain to people that it means they give up their employer based insurance and go on the Medicare for all plan support drops like a stone to about 30%.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:19:03 +0000 ocean-kat comment 265323 at http://dagblog.com I like the idea of extending http://dagblog.com/comment/265322#comment-265322 <a id="comment-265322"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/public-opinion-single-payer-national-health-plans-and-expanding-access-medicare-coverage-27549">Public Opinion on Single-Payer, National Health Plans, and Expanding Access to Medicare Coverage</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I like the idea of extending Medicare to everyone in the country. But "Medicare for All" changes Medicare in ways that I will have to think about. <a href="https://t.co/Xwpll6JLo0">https://t.co/Xwpll6JLo0</a></p> — Noah Smith (@Noahpinion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Noahpinion/status/1100554183726399488?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 27, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:08:01 +0000 artappraiser comment 265322 at http://dagblog.com