dagblog - Comments for "Disclosing Subpoena for Testimony, Chelsea Manning Vows to Fight (Grand Jury on Assange?)" http://dagblog.com/link/disclosing-subpoena-testimony-chelsea-manning-vows-fight-grand-jury-assange-27567 Comments for "Disclosing Subpoena for Testimony, Chelsea Manning Vows to Fight (Grand Jury on Assange?)" en Now this is a perfect example http://dagblog.com/comment/265691#comment-265691 <a id="comment-265691"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265682#comment-265682">Tho maybe more there that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Now this is a perfect example of what's great about Twitter! (Yes, lotsa bad stuff but nobody is required to look at it. Mho, people only see so much bad stuff because: they don't know how to filter out the bad stuff, but more so, they have a desire to get a huge number "followers" rather than a very select audience of followers--they are basically asking for lowest common denominator by wanting that.)</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 09 Mar 2019 07:29:29 +0000 artappraiser comment 265691 at http://dagblog.com Tho maybe more there that http://dagblog.com/comment/265682#comment-265682 <a id="comment-265682"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265671#comment-265671">If I did, I didn&#039;t mean to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Tho maybe more there that they didnt examine close enough the first time...</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">There were three statements/colloquies at the court-martial that involved Chelsea Manning directly. (I know because I transcribed them).<br /> 1) 11/29/12 &amp; 11/30/12 (Pretrial) Article 13. The prosec did not cross exam her on charges, b/c hearing pertained to pre-trial confinement.</p> — Alexa O'Brien (@alexadobrien) <a href="https://twitter.com/alexadobrien/status/1104138838153326592?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 8, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 09 Mar 2019 00:49:15 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 265682 at http://dagblog.com No, you just posted the news, http://dagblog.com/comment/265672#comment-265672 <a id="comment-265672"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265671#comment-265671">If I did, I didn&#039;t mean to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No, you just posted the news, no prejudgment that I recall.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Mar 2019 20:34:05 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 265672 at http://dagblog.com If I did, I didn't mean to http://dagblog.com/comment/265671#comment-265671 <a id="comment-265671"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265669#comment-265669">I think this is a bad idea.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If I did, I didn't mean to sound like it's a good thing. I'd just love to know what she doesn't want to testify about. We don't even know if it is her lawyers reasoning that this is less dangerous or Chelsea on principle...think we never will now...</p> <p>One thing I do agree with her on: Grand Juries are awful and scary process. It's like the prosecutor(s) get extra help on their exams, to try a literal trial balloon before they bring a case, many mulligans.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Mar 2019 20:20:11 +0000 artappraiser comment 265671 at http://dagblog.com I think this is a bad idea. http://dagblog.com/comment/265669#comment-265669 <a id="comment-265669"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265663#comment-265663">Back to the pokey for Chelsea</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think this is a bad idea. She was a whistleblower who divulged we were killing civilians, she did serve her time, the prison guards did treat her like major crap, and she spilled to Wikileaks long befor Assange ruined the brand and teamed up with Russia. This more hurts news and journalism.</p> <p>ETA - and then ran across this:</p> <p> </p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>To me, one of the most horrifying things about the whole Russia thing has been watching some of Chelsea Manning's former supporters turn against her, especially now of all times. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FreeChelsea?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#FreeChelsea</a></p> — Kit O'Connell (@KitOConnell) <a href="https://twitter.com/KitOConnell/status/1104103120030887936?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 8, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Mar 2019 19:38:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 265669 at http://dagblog.com Back to the pokey for Chelsea http://dagblog.com/comment/265663#comment-265663 <a id="comment-265663"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/disclosing-subpoena-testimony-chelsea-manning-vows-fight-grand-jury-assange-27567">Disclosing Subpoena for Testimony, Chelsea Manning Vows to Fight (Grand Jury on Assange?)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Back to the pokey for Chelsea:</p> <p><a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/chelsea-manning-jailed-refusing-testify-grand-jury-virginia-n980016">Chelsea Manning jailed for refusing to testify before grand jury in Virginia</a></p> <p><em>Manning will be in custody until she testifies or until the grand jury ends its work.</em></p> <p>@ NBCNews.com, Updated March 8, 2019, 11:12 AM EST</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Mar 2019 17:36:41 +0000 artappraiser comment 265663 at http://dagblog.com Wikileaks' David House http://dagblog.com/comment/265488#comment-265488 <a id="comment-265488"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/disclosing-subpoena-testimony-chelsea-manning-vows-fight-grand-jury-assange-27567">Disclosing Subpoena for Testimony, Chelsea Manning Vows to Fight (Grand Jury on Assange?)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wikileaks' David House questioned</p> <p><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/wikileaks-veteran-i-cooperated-with-feds-in-exchange-for-immunity">https://www.thedailybeast.com/wikileaks-veteran-i-cooperated-with-feds-i...</a></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Mar 2019 10:21:49 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 265488 at http://dagblog.com