dagblog - Comments for "In rare victory, our folks defeat other folks" http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/rare-victory-our-folks-defeat-other-folks-276 Comments for "In rare victory, our folks defeat other folks" en And could there perhaps be a http://dagblog.com/comment/1640#comment-1640 <a id="comment-1640"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/1631#comment-1631">As usual, let me speak up for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And could there perhaps be a reason why the African-American vote is so strongly Democratic, particularly in the south?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:47:02 +0000 DF comment 1640 at http://dagblog.com Following Saxby's sensible http://dagblog.com/comment/1633#comment-1633 <a id="comment-1633"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/1631#comment-1631">As usual, let me speak up for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Following Saxby's sensible lead, I hereby decree that henceforth, all dagbloggers shall refer to black Democrats as <i>our folks</i> and white Republicans as <i>other folks</i>. Any Republican commenters here may reverse the labels, but in that case, I recommend that you first state your political affiliation so as to avoid confusion.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:40:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 1633 at http://dagblog.com In the south though, those http://dagblog.com/comment/1632#comment-1632 <a id="comment-1632"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/1631#comment-1631">As usual, let me speak up for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In the south though, those words are racially charged. I know who he was talking about and in what context. In my opinion, he should be well enough informed about history and the power of words to be more careful. </p><p>For example, I often use the word "them" when talking about random groups of people, like maybe when talking about a side of my family, I would say, "We'll see them at Christmas."</p> <p>However, if I speaking in a public setting, like maybe an academic classroom, I wouldn't use the word "them" or "those people" when referring to a group that I considered myself to not be a part of, especially if it was a group that was historically oppressed. Would I mean anything by it, if it did happen to slip out? No. But it could be interpreted as if I did and I think when I talk, not just about what I'm saying but about how it will be received. I hold elected officials to at least that same standard. </p></div></div></div> Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:11:23 +0000 Orlando comment 1632 at http://dagblog.com As usual, let me speak up for http://dagblog.com/comment/1631#comment-1631 <a id="comment-1631"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/1628#comment-1628">I think to think of it this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>As usual, let me speak up for the hardworking white Americans.  High African American turnout is to the democratic advantage because 90% of the vote goes to the Democrat whether it's Obama or Bill Clinton or Gore or Dukakis. That's not racism - that's reality. He was commenting about the Obama campaign's highly effective GOTV which put an emphasis on turning out the minority vote.  When Chambliss said our folk, he wasn't talking about Whites in general.  He was talking about White Republicans.  Chambliss is an asshat, but racist based on those remarks is a bit over the top.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:04:00 +0000 Deadman comment 1631 at http://dagblog.com Seems in large part, "our http://dagblog.com/comment/1629#comment-1629 <a id="comment-1629"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/rare-victory-our-folks-defeat-other-folks-276">In rare victory, our folks defeat other folks</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Seems in large part, "our folks" stayed home on Nov 4th.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:59:53 +0000 Donal comment 1629 at http://dagblog.com I think to think of it this http://dagblog.com/comment/1628#comment-1628 <a id="comment-1628"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/rare-victory-our-folks-defeat-other-folks-276">In rare victory, our folks defeat other folks</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think to think of it this way: What would the senate be without at least one gigantic, racist, ass?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:59:47 +0000 Orlando comment 1628 at http://dagblog.com