dagblog - Comments for "Bill Shine out at the White House" http://dagblog.com/link/bill-shine-out-white-house-27625 Comments for "Bill Shine out at the White House" en ah hah, I think you got it. http://dagblog.com/comment/265670#comment-265670 <a id="comment-265670"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265667#comment-265667">The problem was the WH</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>ah hah, I think you got it. And now that we've all gotten to know him, I can see it's actually not in anyone's self interest to inform Trump that they might not really be Trump supporters as he thinks of supporters.</p> <p>(Now it comes to mind: maybe not even Jvanka. Imagine having such a narcissist as a father and him seeing himself in you. Not really expressing sympathy in any way, just thinking of how strange the relationship would be. We all try to manipulate our parents....)</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Mar 2019 20:48:12 +0000 artappraiser comment 265670 at http://dagblog.com The problem was the WH http://dagblog.com/comment/265667#comment-265667 <a id="comment-265667"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/bill-shine-out-white-house-27625">Bill Shine out at the White House</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The problem was the WH thought with Bill Shine they could run fox news instead of fox news running the WH. It just didn't work out with Hannity, Ingraham, Carlson et. al continuing to make policy decisions for Trump.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Mar 2019 18:26:20 +0000 ocean-kat comment 265667 at http://dagblog.com NYT/Maggie Haberman story out http://dagblog.com/comment/265660#comment-265660 <a id="comment-265660"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/bill-shine-out-white-house-27625">Bill Shine out at the White House</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>NYT/Maggie Haberman &amp; Peter Baker story out:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Bill Shine resigns as White House communications chief. <a href="https://twitter.com/maggieNYT?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@maggieNYT</a> <a href="https://t.co/i3Xa03f5Ib">https://t.co/i3Xa03f5Ib</a></p> — Peter Baker (@peterbakernyt) <a href="https://twitter.com/peterbakernyt/status/1104063907700899840?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 8, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> <p>Philip Rucker &amp; Josh Dawsey @ Washington Post also just published:</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/bill-shine-abruptly-resigns-as-white-house-communications-chief/2019/03/08/71d3a8aa-41c2-11e9-a0d3-1210e58a94cf_story.html?utm_term=.3243d2e6539f">Bill Shine abruptly resigns as White House communications chief</a></p> <p>Betsy Klein &amp; Caitlin Collins @ CNN:</p> <p><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/08/politics/bill-shine-white-house-communications/index.html">Ex-Fox News executive Bill Shine out at the White House</a></p> <p>FOX NEWS HAS GOT NOTHING, NADA ON THE STORY, ON HOME PAGE as of now.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Mar 2019 17:16:12 +0000 artappraiser comment 265660 at http://dagblog.com .@maggieNYT & I reported in http://dagblog.com/comment/265658#comment-265658 <a id="comment-265658"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/bill-shine-out-white-house-27625">Bill Shine out at the White House</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">.<a href="https://twitter.com/maggieNYT?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@maggieNYT</a> &amp; I reported in January that Shine wasn’t getting the results POTUS expected. Chemistry continued to fizzle in recent weeks, and Shine was absent at big moments, but his resignation still surprised his allies inside the WH, I am told.</p> — Katie Rogers (@katierogers) <a href="https://twitter.com/katierogers/status/1104064780799799298?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 8, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Mar 2019 16:56:41 +0000 artappraiser comment 265658 at http://dagblog.com Mayer reported that Shine was http://dagblog.com/comment/265656#comment-265656 <a id="comment-265656"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/bill-shine-out-white-house-27625">Bill Shine out at the White House</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Mayer reported that Shine was being paid $7 million bonus from Fox simultaneously while working for the WH, among other things <a href="https://t.co/oimQ8gpB9V">https://t.co/oimQ8gpB9V</a></p> — Laura Rozen (@lrozen) <a href="https://twitter.com/lrozen/status/1104062816850464768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 8, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Mar 2019 16:53:39 +0000 artappraiser comment 265656 at http://dagblog.com