dagblog - Comments for "35 people can destroy a nation (when 34 are Senators...)" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/35-people-can-destroy-nation-when-34-are-senators-27636 Comments for "35 people can destroy a nation (when 34 are Senators...)" en Turns out Ken is responsible http://dagblog.com/comment/265949#comment-265949 <a id="comment-265949"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265737#comment-265737">Claro!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Turns out Ken is responsible for causing this ruckus about McCain with Trump and Fox today, though. A weird twist about the source of the Steele dossier. It is hard to figure out which side of the right Ken is on, perhaps with the "deep staters"?</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>John McCain has been dead for almost seven months. Donald Trump attacked him with a tweet today.<br /><br /> The President of the United States has nothing to better to do with his time. What a sad, little man he is. <a href="https://t.co/FQn5amM494">https://t.co/FQn5amM494</a></p> — Joe Walsh (@WalshFreedom) <a href="https://twitter.com/WalshFreedom/status/1107041277474992128?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 16, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Mar 2019 17:40:28 +0000 artappraiser comment 265949 at http://dagblog.com The possible third option, a http://dagblog.com/comment/265738#comment-265738 <a id="comment-265738"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265735#comment-265735"> </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The possible third option, a NY State indictment for pre election crimes, raises the tantalizing scenario of Trump dodging extradition by staying iin DC...</p> <p> </p> <p>It was, after all,with memories of Charles I misfortunes at the tender mercies of the Lord Mayor of London that the necessity for a Federal jurisdiction over the capital was enunciated!</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 10 Mar 2019 02:42:28 +0000 jollyroger comment 265738 at http://dagblog.com Claro! http://dagblog.com/comment/265737#comment-265737 <a id="comment-265737"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265735#comment-265735"> </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>Claro!</em></p> <p> </p> <p>The idea that an OLC memo should preclude such a crucial remedy (when, after all, would the OLC give any other opinion given they work for the President?) is preposterous.</p> <p> </p> <p>The more so post the SC decision in Jones v. Clinton.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 10 Mar 2019 02:36:31 +0000 jollyroger comment 265737 at http://dagblog.com   http://dagblog.com/comment/265735#comment-265735 <a id="comment-265735"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/35-people-can-destroy-nation-when-34-are-senators-27636">35 people can destroy a nation (when 34 are Senators...)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>To the Hague with him!</em></p> <p>Don't forget there's also <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/media/433195-ken-starr-sitting-presidents-should-be-indictable">Ken's option.</a></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 10 Mar 2019 02:22:02 +0000 artappraiser comment 265735 at http://dagblog.com As to the Founders, well, I http://dagblog.com/comment/265733#comment-265733 <a id="comment-265733"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/35-people-can-destroy-nation-when-34-are-senators-27636">35 people can destroy a nation (when 34 are Senators...)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>As to the Founders, well, I recall there was this that the first prez. was on board with too:</p> <p><em>There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.</em></p> <p>~ JOHN ADAMS, letter to Jonathan Jackson, Oct. 2, 1789</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 10 Mar 2019 02:05:45 +0000 artappraiser comment 265733 at http://dagblog.com