dagblog - Comments for "Just do the right thing" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/just-do-right-thing-27642 Comments for "Just do the right thing" en Power of the purse. http://dagblog.com/comment/265869#comment-265869 <a id="comment-265869"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265857#comment-265857">Looks like the fancy stuff</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/bridgetbhc/status/1106285775048577027">Power of the purse.</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Mar 2019 20:29:00 +0000 artappraiser comment 265869 at http://dagblog.com WaPo this morning-including http://dagblog.com/comment/265860#comment-265860 <a id="comment-265860"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265857#comment-265857">Looks like the fancy stuff</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>WaPo this morning-including he's tweeted he's going to veto:</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-renews-veto-threat-as-senate-prepares-to-rebuke-him-on-national-emergency/2019/03/14/2efbea36-4647-11e9-aaf8-4512a6fe3439_story.html">Trump renews veto threat as Senate prepares to rebuke him on national emergency</a></p> <p>In a morning tweet, the president said he is “prepared to veto” a resolution expected to pass on Thursday.</p> <ul><li>By <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/john-wagner/">John Wagner</a></li> <li>31 minutes ago</li> <li> </li> <li>and </li> <li><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/senate-rebukes-trump-with-vote-ordering-us-military-to-end-support-for-saudi-led-war-in-yemen/2019/03/13/da6a24a8-45c2-11e9-8aab-95b8d80a1e4f_story.html">Senate rebukes Trump with vote ordering U.S. military to end support for Saudi-led war in Yemen</a></li> <li> </li> </ul><p>BUT WAIT THERE'S MORE, help bracing the spines:</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/gary-cohn-says-trump-is-desperate-for-trade-deal-with-china/2019/03/13/56af2396-45c9-11e9-8aab-95b8d80a1e4f_story.html">Gary Cohn says Trump is ‘desperate’ for trade deal with China</a></p> <p><em>The White House is “living in chaos” on major decisions, according to the president’s former top economic adviser.</em></p> <ul><li>By <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-j-lynch/">David J. Lynch</a> </li> </ul></div></div></div> Thu, 14 Mar 2019 11:40:02 +0000 artappraiser comment 265860 at http://dagblog.com More-I shoulda looked at the http://dagblog.com/comment/265859#comment-265859 <a id="comment-265859"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265857#comment-265857">Looks like the fancy stuff</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>More-I shoulda looked at the home page first! Politico's current headline:</p> <p><a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/13/republicans-veto-trump-1221023" target="_top">'Extraordinary': GOP heads for unprecedented clash with Trump</a></p> <p><em>Republicans are preparing to force Trump to issue the first vetoes of his presidency.</em></p> <p>BY <a href="https://www.politico.com/staff/burgess-everett" rel="author" target="_top">BURGESS EVERETT</a>, <a href="https://www.politico.com/staff/eliana-johnson" rel="author" target="_top">ELIANA JOHNSON</a> AND <a href="https://www.politico.com/staff/john-bresnahan" rel="author" target="_top">JOHN BRESNAHAN</a> Updated 03/13/2019 09:49 PM EDT</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Mar 2019 11:32:13 +0000 artappraiser comment 265859 at http://dagblog.com Looks like the fancy stuff http://dagblog.com/comment/265857#comment-265857 <a id="comment-265857"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265824#comment-265824">Throw into this picture what</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Looks like the fancy stuff didn't work, seeing more than one story like this, that the Dem resolution is going to pass and expecting Trump to veto:</p> <p><a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/433980-senate-to-rebuke-trump-on-wall">Senate to rebuke Trump on wall</a></p> <p>headline story @ TheHill.com - 03/14/19 06:00 AM EDT</p> <p>Senate also just dissed last night on Yemen/Saudis!</p> <p><a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/13/senate-rebuffs-trump-with-vote-cutting-off-us-support-in-yemen-war-1221063">Senate rebuffs Trump with vote cutting off U.S. support in Yemen</a></p> <p><em>Several Republicans joined Democrats to build a bipartisan majority for the measure.</em></p> <p>@ Politico. com, Updated 03/13/2019 06:51 PM EDT</p> <p>Edit to add: Politico is more blatant on the national emergency resolution, pointing out the irony that it is a like a coalition between the Dems and Trump to foil the GOP, hah:</p> <p><a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/13/democrats-national-emergency-vote-1219997">Trump and Dems destroy GOP effort to escape national emergency bind</a></p> <p>Updated 03/13/2019 04:19 PM EDT</p> <p><em>The president told Senate Republicans he would not agree to curtail his powers in order to stem defections on the disapproval vote.</em></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Mar 2019 11:29:12 +0000 artappraiser comment 265857 at http://dagblog.com Timing is all important - if http://dagblog.com/comment/265856#comment-265856 <a id="comment-265856"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265833#comment-265833">Another thing about the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Timing is all important - if Trump were impeached today, the Republicans will have recovered by Nov 2020.<br /> This trainwreck has to at least endure into the fall if not later - normal Joe/Joetta Sixpack is way too forgetful and forgiving.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:01:49 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 265856 at http://dagblog.com Another thing about the http://dagblog.com/comment/265833#comment-265833 <a id="comment-265833"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265824#comment-265824">Throw into this picture what</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Another thing about the notion of Senate GOP turning on Trump is that such a thing would only happen if it allowed them an exit from the fall out. I think Pelosi is liking the way they are all tied to the mast of the sinking ship.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Mar 2019 20:33:39 +0000 moat comment 265833 at http://dagblog.com Throw into this picture what http://dagblog.com/comment/265824#comment-265824 <a id="comment-265824"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/just-do-right-thing-27642">Just do the right thing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Throw into this picture what the Senate GOP is doing right now to try to mollify bully Trump:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Trump views the resolution of disapproval as one of the biggest fights of his presidency and has been telling Republicans that anyone who opposes him is being disloyal. <a href="https://t.co/bWVAVgmKjh">https://t.co/bWVAVgmKjh</a></p> — Glenn Thrush (@GlennThrush) <a href="https://twitter.com/GlennThrush/status/1105793600225447937?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 13, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> <p>Pelosi et. al. have to play chess, think like the Senate GOP are thinking, put themselves in their shoes. Most of these guys probably wish Pence was there instead of Trump, but they have to deal with Trump's popularity with a significant portion of their own constituency.  They think they can't have the luxury of principles about Trump or they might not get re-elected. So <em>successful</em> impeachment with removal would all depend on how egregious the issues presented are, whether they turn off enough of Trump's base.</p> <p>Seems to me they are thinking big picture and time frame to do impeachment. Is it not better to just keep trying to court the majority of voters with what you do and not put a ton of effort into a very hard job to try to incite a few of Trump's base to turn in order to get enough GOP Senators? Hope that some GOP Senators will have such strong principles that they will fall on their swords? Etc.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:51:10 +0000 artappraiser comment 265824 at http://dagblog.com Sure. The sobering fact that http://dagblog.com/comment/265816#comment-265816 <a id="comment-265816"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265810#comment-265810">Many people don&#039;t listen to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sure. The sobering fact that Trump only trailed Hillary by 3 million votes illustrates that. Given that the House  <u>should</u> do the right thing ,there ´s the separate  question of whether it´s winning politics.</p> <p>Personally I believe  the net effect on  votes would be  a loss , too many people will see an impeachment as too much like a shut down- an interference with the act of governing..</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Mar 2019 12:53:42 +0000 Flavius comment 265816 at http://dagblog.com Many people don't listen to http://dagblog.com/comment/265810#comment-265810 <a id="comment-265810"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/just-do-right-thing-27642">Just do the right thing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Many people don't listen to poll questions and consider rationally what answer to give. Sometimes all they hear is are you a democrat or a republican. That's all their answer means. It often doesn't mean anything about the issue or policy question. When asked about impeachment some don't even think about it. All they think is I hate that motherfucken asshole. Impeach!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Mar 2019 04:22:19 +0000 ocean-kat comment 265810 at http://dagblog.com  Investigations-not http://dagblog.com/comment/265808#comment-265808 <a id="comment-265808"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265807#comment-265807">Since the Senate has to be on</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> Investigations-not impeachment -might help (us) , might hurt . But  no point  debating  because it´s the House´s duty so it should .And will. </p> <p>But we shouldn´t  indulge ourselves in premature anticipation of  the coming  press clipping.</p> <p>If Nancy ,or someone, makes  sure  the chairmen perform like Cummings   my guess, FWIW,  is the Reps will  shoot themselves in the foot. (¨That 's right , take careful aim , don´t anyone jostle his arm!¨) </p> <p>Provided <u>we </u>walk and chew gum:  also produce useful legislation.</p> <p>But that's not a gimmee. It was great  taking the House.  Pity about the Senate.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Mar 2019 03:13:34 +0000 Flavius comment 265808 at http://dagblog.com