dagblog - Comments for "Mueller Report: Odd moment of House Consensus" http://dagblog.com/link/mueller-report-odd-moment-house-consensus-27668 Comments for "Mueller Report: Odd moment of House Consensus" en Aaron's still watching Graham http://dagblog.com/comment/265969#comment-265969 <a id="comment-265969"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265891#comment-265891">Aaron Blake of WaPo&#039;s The Fix</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Aaron Blake's still watching Graham/Trump beat closely, trying to figure it out:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Trump historically will treat someone with as much negativity as they will let get him get away with. <a href="https://t.co/24Ti7jbpEK">https://t.co/24Ti7jbpEK</a></p> — Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) <a href="https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1107755458205573126?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 18, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:42:00 +0000 artappraiser comment 265969 at http://dagblog.com They'll be having a chuckle http://dagblog.com/comment/265894#comment-265894 <a id="comment-265894"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265890#comment-265890">RICO indictment of the Trump</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>They'll be having a chuckle at Emptywheel where it's long noted that RICO is much harder to pull off than lesser charges. I'll try to dig up link.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 Mar 2019 21:50:14 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 265894 at http://dagblog.com Because he's an old hen and http://dagblog.com/comment/265893#comment-265893 <a id="comment-265893"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265891#comment-265891">Aaron Blake of WaPo&#039;s The Fix</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Because he's an old hen and someone has the goods? Unlikely - he's too out. Maybe RU comprmised as well? e.gn illegal $ or something tangible?</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 Mar 2019 21:46:23 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 265893 at http://dagblog.com Aaron Blake of WaPo's The Fix http://dagblog.com/comment/265891#comment-265891 <a id="comment-265891"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265866#comment-265866">but but Lindsay Graham:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Aaron Blake of WaPo's The Fix on:  <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/03/15/house-voted-release-mueller-report-so-why-is-lindsey-graham-blocking-it/?utm_term=.0a8c9e692fdf">So why is Lindsey Graham blocking the bill?</a></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 Mar 2019 20:03:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 265891 at http://dagblog.com RICO indictment of the Trump http://dagblog.com/comment/265890#comment-265890 <a id="comment-265890"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/mueller-report-odd-moment-house-consensus-27668">Mueller Report: Odd moment of House Consensus</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>RICO indictment of the Trump campaign?</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">If you read nothing about the Mueller investigation today, at least read the excerpt below from an article by <a href="https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@NatashaBertrand</a> in The Atlantic. It'll knock your socks off. (Click on the picture to open up the full view of it.)<br /><br /> The original article (3/15): <a href="https://t.co/vLuC59ZZtL">https://t.co/vLuC59ZZtL</a> <a href="https://t.co/4BgelaUQx1">pic.twitter.com/4BgelaUQx1</a></p> — Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) <a href="https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1106584310646259712?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 15, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 Mar 2019 19:46:02 +0000 artappraiser comment 265890 at http://dagblog.com Why? Maybe this? http://dagblog.com/comment/265867#comment-265867 <a id="comment-265867"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/265866#comment-265866">but but Lindsay Graham:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Why? Maybe this? Represents SC after all.</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Donald Trump has more support within the <a href="https://twitter.com/GOP?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@GOP</a> than any Republican POTUS since the invention of polling.<br /><br /> If enough Democrats aren’t happy with their party’s nominee, overwhelming GOP support would be enough for Trump to win again. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Election2020?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Election2020</a><a href="https://t.co/JIYNCGDLcK">https://t.co/JIYNCGDLcK</a></p> — Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) <a href="https://twitter.com/FrankLuntz/status/1106284029769408514?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 14, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Mar 2019 20:19:09 +0000 artappraiser comment 265867 at http://dagblog.com but but Lindsay Graham: http://dagblog.com/comment/265866#comment-265866 <a id="comment-265866"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/mueller-report-odd-moment-house-consensus-27668">Mueller Report: Odd moment of House Consensus</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>but but Lindsey Graham:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>A *unanimously* House-passed resolution <a href="https://t.co/3o3M0Eygg7">https://t.co/3o3M0Eygg7</a></p> — Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) <a href="https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1106285748922114048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 14, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Mar 2019 20:15:12 +0000 artappraiser comment 265866 at http://dagblog.com