dagblog - Comments for "Stone indictment proves Barr misled" http://dagblog.com/link/stone-indictment-proves-barr-misled-27769 Comments for "Stone indictment proves Barr misled" en It seems to me that at least http://dagblog.com/comment/266384#comment-266384 <a id="comment-266384"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/266381#comment-266381">&quot;Congress prepares for a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It seems to me that at least the relevant committee members investigating Trump should see the whole report.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 01 Apr 2019 03:25:57 +0000 ocean-kat comment 266384 at http://dagblog.com "Congress prepares for a http://dagblog.com/comment/266381#comment-266381 <a id="comment-266381"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/stone-indictment-proves-barr-misled-27769">Stone indictment proves Barr misled</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"Congress prepares for a battle over secret grand jury evidence in Russia inquiry; 'I intend to fight'"</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="und" xml:lang="und"> <a href="https://t.co/X2pGxvJ44A">https://t.co/X2pGxvJ44A</a></p> — Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) <a href="https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1112544056322785282?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>Not sure I am thrilled that they feel they have to go there.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 01 Apr 2019 02:37:43 +0000 artappraiser comment 266381 at http://dagblog.com Yes but I don't think Rick http://dagblog.com/comment/266379#comment-266379 <a id="comment-266379"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/266378#comment-266378">Hmmm, well some of these are</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes but I don't think Rick was going there, he was doing a gotcha to <u>Wikileaks </u> tweeted what they said about it:  Wikileaks has deleted it now I see!!! Almost as if one of the Hillary-hating pro-Trump agitprop posting kiddies from 8 Chan got the key to their Twitter feed.</p> <p>I still had it up in a tab from before their deletion. This is what Wikileaks said, it sounded just like one of them, or some Russian bot boss, for that matter:</p> <blockquote> <p>Why Trump won? Millions young men stripped of romance and children (possibly by the post 2008 crash soar in wealth inequality) via memetic warfare against an avowedly feminist candidate? Who will harness this vast young army with free time in 2020?</p> </blockquote> <p>What does young men not having sex have to do with working for Trump? Really? What did he do for them. what was he promising? I don't see he was promising any sex. He was promising 1950's MAGA and they were reading into that a fantasy version of 1950's, everyone getting Stepford stay at home wives, every guy a winner dominating over women</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 01 Apr 2019 02:28:50 +0000 artappraiser comment 266379 at http://dagblog.com Hmmm, well some of these are http://dagblog.com/comment/266378#comment-266378 <a id="comment-266378"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/266377#comment-266377">Agreed https://t.co</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hmmm, well some of these are Pepe-le-Frog true believers, but isn't this a culture wars stat worth taking seriously and *possibly* offering *some* compassion? What drives this - overwork? A decrease in social activities? rural or suburban or urban separation? poor social skills? confusion/changes in mating rituals &amp; signalling? online porn &amp; unrealistic expectations? mobile phone preoccupation/substitution? Testosterone has to go somewhere...</p> <p>(I don't have the stats, but I'd guess rape and incest have gone down - maybe that's it, the explanation, but seems unlikely)</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 01 Apr 2019 01:22:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 266378 at http://dagblog.com Agreed https://t.co http://dagblog.com/comment/266377#comment-266377 <a id="comment-266377"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/stone-indictment-proves-barr-misled-27769">Stone indictment proves Barr misled</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Agreed <a href="https://t.co/97hJ7cuMDW">https://t.co/97hJ7cuMDW</a></p> — Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/1112433077391974401?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 31, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>Also, an aside--hat tip to Rick here for catching this, it is almost as if Wikileaks is doing a little pro-incel anti-Hillary thing--very interesting:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">You forgot to use a Pepe meme and post this on 8chan first.<br /><br /> See you soon, Rapey! <a href="https://t.co/Fnjvry82Gx">https://t.co/Fnjvry82Gx</a></p> — Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/1112489751251206144?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 31, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 31 Mar 2019 23:31:38 +0000 artappraiser comment 266377 at http://dagblog.com One great journalist http://dagblog.com/comment/266352#comment-266352 <a id="comment-266352"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/stone-indictment-proves-barr-misled-27769">Stone indictment proves Barr misled</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>One great journalist recommending another's piece:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">As usual in the Trump presidency, “the truth will have a hard time catching up” : The Mueller Bait and Switch by Elizabeth Drew <a href="https://twitter.com/ProSyn?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ProSyn</a> <a href="https://t.co/nOMykcsq9w">https://t.co/nOMykcsq9w</a></p> — Jane Mayer (@JaneMayerNYer) <a href="https://twitter.com/JaneMayerNYer/status/1112020794966716417?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 30, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 30 Mar 2019 22:41:34 +0000 artappraiser comment 266352 at http://dagblog.com Maggie gets uppity in direct http://dagblog.com/comment/266322#comment-266322 <a id="comment-266322"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/stone-indictment-proves-barr-misled-27769">Stone indictment proves Barr misled</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maggie gets uppity in direct reply:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>It’s almost like people around potus have realized that the details in the report might not be that great. <a href="https://t.co/QBUU0UKdBe">https://t.co/QBUU0UKdBe</a></p> — Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) <a href="https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1111774349198016516?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 29, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> <p>And Richard sees a troll redirecting the narrative:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The “national emergency” he worries about is the pending release of the Mueller Report by mid-April. A big fight with Democrats over the border is probably his best response.<a href="https://t.co/LVD1prP79w">https://t.co/LVD1prP79w</a></p> — Richard W. Painter (@RWPUSA) <a href="https://twitter.com/RWPUSA/status/1111786853525540864?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 30, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 30 Mar 2019 00:29:40 +0000 artappraiser comment 266322 at http://dagblog.com Redacted Mueller report by http://dagblog.com/comment/266316#comment-266316 <a id="comment-266316"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/stone-indictment-proves-barr-misled-27769">Stone indictment proves Barr misled</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Redacted Mueller report by mid-April:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Breaking News: The U.S. attorney general, William Barr, plans to release the nearly 400-page Mueller report, in redacted form, by mid-April. “Everyone will soon be able to read it.” <a href="https://t.co/Vsszz0HsZj">https://t.co/Vsszz0HsZj</a></p> — The New York Times (@nytimes) <a href="https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1111714897509998592?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 29, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 Mar 2019 23:22:30 +0000 artappraiser comment 266316 at http://dagblog.com