dagblog - Comments for "Judge won’t ID mystery company in Mueller grand jury fight. But..." http://dagblog.com/link/judge-won-t-id-mystery-company-mueller-grand-jury-fight-27814 Comments for "Judge won’t ID mystery company in Mueller grand jury fight. But..." en Congress should subpoena the http://dagblog.com/comment/266444#comment-266444 <a id="comment-266444"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/judge-won-t-id-mystery-company-mueller-grand-jury-fight-27814">Judge won’t ID mystery company in Mueller grand jury fight. But...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Congress should subpoena the whole Mueller Report and Chief Justice Roberts is likely to *rule for releasing* it, if it comes to that...<br /><br /> -- an attorney who has argued many cases before SCOTUS, fmr Obama acting Solicitor General <a href="https://twitter.com/neal_katyal?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@neal_katyal</a>: <a href="https://t.co/oZxDDB356w">https://t.co/oZxDDB356w</a></p> — Ari Melber (@AriMelber) <a href="https://twitter.com/AriMelber/status/1113137572908331008?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 2, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:54:30 +0000 artappraiser comment 266444 at http://dagblog.com As usual the keepers are http://dagblog.com/comment/266435#comment-266435 <a id="comment-266435"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/judge-won-t-id-mystery-company-mueller-grand-jury-fight-27814">Judge won’t ID mystery company in Mueller grand jury fight. But...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>As usual the keepers are having trouble getting the flim flam man to tamp down the hyperbole:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Senior White House official to <a href="https://twitter.com/NYMag?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@NYMag</a>: “There will be plenty of unfavorable things about the president in the full report, which we think will eventually come out, so let’s not go overboard saying there’s no wrongdoing. Let’s move on.” <a href="https://t.co/ZACTuQHXPR">https://t.co/ZACTuQHXPR</a></p> — Olivia Nuzzi (@Olivianuzzi) <a href="https://twitter.com/Olivianuzzi/status/1113107007647690752?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 2, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 02 Apr 2019 16:44:20 +0000 artappraiser comment 266435 at http://dagblog.com Dems ramp up subpoena threats http://dagblog.com/comment/266430#comment-266430 <a id="comment-266430"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/judge-won-t-id-mystery-company-mueller-grand-jury-fight-27814">Judge won’t ID mystery company in Mueller grand jury fight. But...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/436836-dems-ramp-up-subpoena-threats">Dems ramp up subpoena threats</a></p> <p>By Morgan Chalfant &amp; Olivia Beavers @ TheHill.com - 04/01/19 08:23 PM EDT</p> <blockquote> <p>[....] The chairman of the House Oversight and Reform Committee intensified a fight over White House security clearances on Monday, while the House Judiciary Committee announced it would vote Wednesday on authorizing a subpoena to compel the release of Mueller’s full report and underlying evidence to Congress [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Tue, 02 Apr 2019 05:55:36 +0000 artappraiser comment 266430 at http://dagblog.com Don’t Wait For a Redacted http://dagblog.com/comment/266429#comment-266429 <a id="comment-266429"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/judge-won-t-id-mystery-company-mueller-grand-jury-fight-27814">Judge won’t ID mystery company in Mueller grand jury fight. But...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/01/redacted-mueller-report-226343">Don’t Wait For a Redacted Mueller Report</a></p> <p><em>The law is clear: Congress is entitled to the full 400 pages.</em></p> <p>Op-ed By NELSON W. CUNNINGHAM @ Politico Magazine April 01, 2019</p> <p><em>Nelson W. Cunningham has served as a federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York under Rudolph Giuliani, general counsel of the Senate Judiciary Committee under then-chair Joseph R. Biden, and general counsel of the White House Office of Administration under Bill Clinton.</em></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 02 Apr 2019 05:51:26 +0000 artappraiser comment 266429 at http://dagblog.com