dagblog - Comments for "Misthrow on the Hudson: Urban Blight as Public Planning?"

Perhaps answers your headline

artappraiser — Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:41:11 +0000

In reply to Misthrow on the Hudson: Urban Blight as Public Planning?

Turns out it was complex crooked "urban planning" as is typical, in order to get $1.6 billion funds targeted for "low income housing" financing. FOIA request was necessary to get that. These are the kind of games the NYC machine plays with taxpayer funds.And then wonder why people are cynical about paying taxes.

Perhaps answers your headline

artappraiser — Sun, 14 Apr 2019 21:41:29 +0000

In reply to Misthrow on the Hudson: Urban Blight as Public Planning?

Perhaps answers your headline question more succinctly than my comment. The answer is yes:

Yeah Singapore Airport's new indoor waterfall is fancy and all, but JFK airport did it first! NYC innovating as always pic.twitter.com/g2FdSlSe39
— Andrew (@CopticChad) April 14, 2019

But it will be "jobs jobs

artappraiser — Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:31:07 +0000

In reply to Misthrow on the Hudson: Urban Blight as Public Planning?

But it will be "jobs jobs jobs" when they tear most of it down in a couple decades if not sooner. Traditionally this is what NYC "urban planning" is.