dagblog - Comments for "The Guardian view on Julian Assange: it would be wrong to extradite him" http://dagblog.com/link/guardian-view-julian-assange-it-would-be-wrong-extradite-him-27880 Comments for "The Guardian view on Julian Assange: it would be wrong to extradite him" en Julian Assange 'too ill' to http://dagblog.com/comment/268286#comment-268286 <a id="comment-268286"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/guardian-view-julian-assange-it-would-be-wrong-extradite-him-27880">The Guardian view on Julian Assange: it would be wrong to extradite him</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48459760">Julian Assange 'too ill' to appear for court hearing, says lawyer</a></p> <p>@ BBC News, May 30</p> <blockquote> <p>[....] He had been due to appear at his case management hearing via video link from Belmarsh Prison but lawyer Gareth Peirce said he was "not very well".</p> <p>According to WikiLeaks, Assange has been moved to the medical ward in jail.</p> <p>A spokesman for the whistleblowing website said it had "grave concerns" about Assange's health.</p> <p>"During the seven weeks in Belmarsh his health has continued to deteriorate and he has dramatically lost weight," the spokesman said.</p> <p>"Defence lawyer for Assange, Per Samuelson, said that Julian Assange's health state last Friday was such 'that it was not possible to conduct a normal conversation with him'." [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Thu, 30 May 2019 23:39:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 268286 at http://dagblog.com Key U.S. Attorney, Swept Into http://dagblog.com/comment/267240#comment-267240 <a id="comment-267240"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/guardian-view-julian-assange-it-would-be-wrong-extradite-him-27880">The Guardian view on Julian Assange: it would be wrong to extradite him</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Key U.S. Attorney, Swept Into Russia Investigation, May Prosecute WikiLeaks Case <a href="https://t.co/eUWwstgDmE">https://t.co/eUWwstgDmE</a></p> — Alexa O'Brien (@alexadobrien) <a href="https://twitter.com/alexadobrien/status/1120850647119589376?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 24, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:40:50 +0000 artappraiser comment 267240 at http://dagblog.com The Assange Complaint Was http://dagblog.com/comment/266949#comment-266949 <a id="comment-266949"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/266924#comment-266924">U.S. Prosecutors Have Had</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.emptywheel.net/2019/04/15/the-assange-complaint-was-filed-the-day-the-uk-rejected-assanges-diplomatic-status/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: The Assange Complaint Was Filed the Day the UK Rejected Assange’s Diplomatic Status">The Assange Complaint Was Filed the Day the UK Rejected Assange’s Diplomatic Status</a></p> <p><a href="https://www.emptywheel.net/2019/04/15/the-assange-complaint-was-filed-the-day-the-uk-rejected-assanges-diplomatic-status/">https://www.emptywheel.net/2019/04/15/the-assange-complaint-was-filed-th...</a><br /><br /> I.e. when it became obvious Assange would use any absurd trick he could, they put down the indictment. Of course by this time Julian had worked with Donald &amp; Roger to help throw the election and deal out stolen emails (even after Donald &amp; Mike Flynn had been briefed by the NSA about what the Russians were up to - a meeting where they were all mum about their various past &amp; current real estate deals, employing Russian dirty tricks guys &amp; even changing the GOP platform to accommodate the Russians)</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:24:26 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 266949 at http://dagblog.com Suspicious New WikiLeaks http://dagblog.com/comment/266948#comment-266948 <a id="comment-266948"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/guardian-view-julian-assange-it-would-be-wrong-extradite-him-27880">The Guardian view on Julian Assange: it would be wrong to extradite him</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Suspicious New WikiLeaks Document Dump Exposes How Awesome And Trustworthy U.S. Government Is <a href="https://t.co/WEgDuvRPrb">https://t.co/WEgDuvRPrb</a> <a href="https://t.co/rKZ1OGVUPV">pic.twitter.com/rKZ1OGVUPV</a></p> — The Onion (@TheOnion) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheOnion/status/1118176242799468545?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 16, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:39:57 +0000 artappraiser comment 266948 at http://dagblog.com Assange tried to use embassy http://dagblog.com/comment/266940#comment-266940 <a id="comment-266940"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/guardian-view-julian-assange-it-would-be-wrong-extradite-him-27880">The Guardian view on Julian Assange: it would be wrong to extradite him</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/apr/14/assange-tried-to-use-embassy-as-centre-for-spying-says-ecuadors-moreno">Assange tried to use embassy as 'centre for spying', says Ecuador's Moreno</a></p> <p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/apr/14/assange-tried-to-use-embassy-as-centre-for-spying-says-ecuadors-moreno">Exclusive: President says he has it in writing from UK that WikiLeaks cofounder’s rights will be respected</a></p> <p>@ TheGuardian.com, April 14</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 16 Apr 2019 07:46:24 +0000 artappraiser comment 266940 at http://dagblog.com U.S. Prosecutors Have Had http://dagblog.com/comment/266924#comment-266924 <a id="comment-266924"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/guardian-view-julian-assange-it-would-be-wrong-extradite-him-27880">The Guardian view on Julian Assange: it would be wrong to extradite him</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">U.S. Prosecutors Have Had Julian Assange Charges at the Ready Since 2017 <a href="https://t.co/I2BxfgkN3J">https://t.co/I2BxfgkN3J</a> <a href="https://t.co/oiBECGcSpE">pic.twitter.com/oiBECGcSpE</a></p> — Law &amp; Crime (@lawcrimenews) <a href="https://twitter.com/lawcrimenews/status/1117933027852726272?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 15, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>I checked:<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUtT0b0EnSw"> <em>I love Wikileaks</em> was 10/10/16</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:13:05 +0000 artappraiser comment 266924 at http://dagblog.com Is auctioning off classified http://dagblog.com/comment/266854#comment-266854 <a id="comment-266854"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/guardian-view-julian-assange-it-would-be-wrong-extradite-him-27880">The Guardian view on Julian Assange: it would be wrong to extradite him</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Is auctioning off classified government data to the highest bidder considered journalism? </p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I can say with certainty today after reviewing my own research and material that I have collected over the years (and I have a lot, much of which has never been published) that there's WikiLeaks related investigation material under seal in *Eastern District of New York.*</p> — Alexa O'Brien (@alexadobrien) <a href="https://twitter.com/alexadobrien/status/1117185100901486598?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 13, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 14 Apr 2019 15:46:08 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 266854 at http://dagblog.com George Galloway claimed: http://dagblog.com/comment/266851#comment-266851 <a id="comment-266851"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/266849#comment-266849">Retweeted by Laura Rozen:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>George Galloway claimed: simply a case of “bad sexual etiquette”, he said. “I mean, not everybody needs to be asked prior to each insertion.”</p> </blockquote> <p>But one would think the woman should at least be awake.</p> <p>When I first heard about wikileaks I said it would take a saint to run it without using it for personal reasons, personal gain, personal power, revenge, partisan advantage. Assange isn't a saint and so that's what happened.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 14 Apr 2019 03:35:12 +0000 ocean-kat comment 266851 at http://dagblog.com Retweeted by Laura Rozen: http://dagblog.com/comment/266849#comment-266849 <a id="comment-266849"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/guardian-view-julian-assange-it-would-be-wrong-extradite-him-27880">The Guardian view on Julian Assange: it would be wrong to extradite him</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Retweeted by Laura Rozen:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Brilliantly written takedown of Julian Assange. Wikileaks was the future once. Then it became Julian Assange <a href="https://t.co/Te67Cq3Od2">https://t.co/Te67Cq3Od2</a></p> — Barbara Demick (@BarbaraDemick) <a href="https://twitter.com/BarbaraDemick/status/1117251638727729152?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 14, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 14 Apr 2019 02:22:29 +0000 artappraiser comment 266849 at http://dagblog.com The ACLU: http://dagblog.com/comment/266848#comment-266848 <a id="comment-266848"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/guardian-view-julian-assange-it-would-be-wrong-extradite-him-27880">The Guardian view on Julian Assange: it would be wrong to extradite him</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The ACLU: a worrisome indictment:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">There is no First Amendment right to crack a government password — but this indictment characterizes routine journalistic activities, such as encouraging a source to provide more information, as ‘part of’ a criminal conspiracy.<br /><br /> That should worry us all.<a href="https://t.co/9LNWrf6o2y">https://t.co/9LNWrf6o2y</a></p> — ACLU (@ACLU) <a href="https://twitter.com/ACLU/status/1117206114314215427?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 13, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Criminally prosecuting a publisher for the publication of truthful information would be a first in American history — and unconstitutional.<br /><br /> The government may not have crossed that line last week, but the worst case scenario cannot yet be ruled out. <a href="https://t.co/DzUV6RTJnp">https://t.co/DzUV6RTJnp</a></p> — ACLU (@ACLU) <a href="https://twitter.com/ACLU/status/1117206112917389312?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 13, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 13 Apr 2019 23:45:40 +0000 artappraiser comment 266848 at http://dagblog.com