dagblog - Comments for "House asks judge to block Trump plan for border wall funds" http://dagblog.com/link/house-asks-judge-block-trump-plan-border-wall-funds-27991 Comments for "House asks judge to block Trump plan for border wall funds" en The full doc @ Lawfare, this http://dagblog.com/comment/267269#comment-267269 <a id="comment-267269"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/house-asks-judge-block-trump-plan-border-wall-funds-27991">House asks judge to block Trump plan for border wall funds</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The full doc @ Lawfare, this is a big deal Constitutionally: </p> <p><a href="https://www.lawfareblog.com/document-house-representatives-seeks-preliminary-injunction-against-border-wall">UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, <em>Plaintiff</em> vs. STEVEN T. MNUCHIN  his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury,<em> et. al., Defendants</em></a></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 24 Apr 2019 19:18:04 +0000 artappraiser comment 267269 at http://dagblog.com This is not theoretical b.s., http://dagblog.com/comment/267267#comment-267267 <a id="comment-267267"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/house-asks-judge-block-trump-plan-border-wall-funds-27991">House asks judge to block Trump plan for border wall funds</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This is not theoretical b.s., the wheels have been set in motion, nearly $1 billion in contracts awarded last month. I don't know if Congress could void the contracts that easily even if they managed to get the courts to stop the action. The Federal government is a huge and complicated bureaucracy, after all. Note the House counsel is actually arguing that they cannot get the money back, so it's actually unlikely ” <em>House General Counsel Doug Letter and other lawyers wrote. “Once made, these unconstitutional expenditures cannot be undone, and the grave institutional injury inflicted on the House cannot be remedied.” </em></p> <p>A.P. via Military Times</p> <p><a href="https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2019/04/24/military-funds-being-used-for-border-wall-in-arizona-new-mexico/">Military funds being used for border wall in Arizona, New Mexico</a>, 16 hours ago</p> <blockquote> <p>YUMA, Ariz. — The U.S. government is moving forward with plans to <a href="https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2019/03/18/border-wall-milcon-cuts-list-is-in-is-your-base-on-it/" target="_blank">use military funds to build border barriers</a> in Arizona and New Mexico.</p> <p>The Department of Homeland Security issued waivers to environmental laws last week to build and replace 46 miles (74 kilometers) of barriers near Columbus, New Mexico, and 11 miles (17 kilometers) near Yuma, Arizona.</p> <p>The barriers are being <a href="https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2019/03/14/senators-complain-of-slush-fund-and-lack-of-border-wall-details-as-pentagon-chief-faces-budget-questions/" target="_blank">funded by the Department of Defense </a>following President Donald Trump’s emergency declaration in February. </p> <p>Last month, the federal government announced it had awarded contracts of nearly $1 billion to replace short barriers with tall fences in those areas [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Wed, 24 Apr 2019 19:02:32 +0000 artappraiser comment 267267 at http://dagblog.com