dagblog - Comments for "&quot;The 2020 election isn’t going to be close&quot;" http://dagblog.com/link/2020-election-isn-t-going-be-close-28031 Comments for ""The 2020 election isn’t going to be close"" en They just put this "no taxes http://dagblog.com/comment/267427#comment-267427 <a id="comment-267427"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/267426#comment-267426">NYTimes political story from</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>They just put this "no taxes paid" chart from the article up on the NYTimes.com home page:</p> <p><img alt="" height="333" src="https://static01.nyt.com/images/2019/04/29/us/politics/taxes-promo/taxes-promo-threeByTwoLargeAt2X-v3.png?quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;disable=upscale&amp;width=1620" width="500" /></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:24:27 +0000 artappraiser comment 267427 at http://dagblog.com NYTimes political story from http://dagblog.com/comment/267426#comment-267426 <a id="comment-267426"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/267406#comment-267406">Getting there?  (Psst: hey</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>NYTimes political story from Akron dittoes the meme in the ABC/WaPo poll (Their story's got 1169 comments in 10 minutes?! Methinks not possible, maybe they updated, in any case, clearly a popular meme)</p> <p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/29/us/politics/democrats-taxes-2020.html">Profitable Giants Like Amazon Pay $0 in Corporate Taxes. Some Voters Are Sick of It.</a> 10m ag<br /><em>The number of companies paying zero corporate taxes roughly doubled last year after President Trump’s 2017 tax bill. In Ohio, Democrats haven’t figured out how to leverage anxiety over income inequality to defeat Mr. Trump.</em></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:21:52 +0000 artappraiser comment 267426 at http://dagblog.com Poli-sci prof says about the http://dagblog.com/comment/267409#comment-267409 <a id="comment-267409"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/267406#comment-267406">Getting there?  (Psst: hey</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Poli-sci prof says about the poll:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Millions will likely vote for Trump even while disapproving of him, and they will rationalize it by saying that the Democratic nominee, whoever it is, was too far left or flawed, or otherwise didn’t address their concerns.<a href="https://t.co/Nt3PV8F7HE">https://t.co/Nt3PV8F7HE</a></p> — Seth Masket (@smotus) <a href="https://twitter.com/smotus/status/1122922997159870464?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 29, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:51:13 +0000 artappraiser comment 267409 at http://dagblog.com Getting there?  (Psst: hey http://dagblog.com/comment/267406#comment-267406 <a id="comment-267406"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/2020-election-isn-t-going-be-close-28031">&quot;The 2020 election isn’t going to be close&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Getting there?  (Psst: hey neighbor, have you listened to what that Pochantas Senator is saying?)</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/populist-economic-frustration-threatens-trumps-strongest-reelection-issue-post-abc-poll-finds/2019/04/28/44f64cbc-6a02-11e9-9d56-1c0cf2c7ac04_story.html?utm_term=.4ac697b0083f">Populist economic frustration threatens Trump’s strongest reelection issue, Post-ABC poll finds</a></p> <p>By Seung Min Kim &amp; Scott Clement @ WashingtonPost.com, April 29</p> <blockquote> <p>President Trump’s strongest case for reelection remains the country’s healthy economy, but the potency of that issue for him is complicated by a widespread belief that the economy mainly benefits people already in power, a <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2019/04/29/National-Politics/Polling/release_549.xml">Washington Post-ABC News poll</a> finds.</p> <p>The result previews a fresh wave of populism that could reshape yet another presidential campaign with about 18 months to go before voters decide whether to return Trump to the White House.</p> <p>This sentiment runs the deepest among Democratic and independent registered voters, but also exists among a significant slice of Republicans. About 8 in 10 Democrats and more than 6 in 10 independents say the country’s economic system gives an advantage to those already in power, while nearly a third of Republicans share that view.</p> <p><img alt="" height="581" src="https://www.washingtonpost.com/resizer/mla50K_NVZTB67VeEwh3qzDg9Ck=/1484x0/arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/M556G5DKFEI6TPR2GMQXEQFFHE.png" style="float:left" width="550" /></p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>[....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Mon, 29 Apr 2019 16:37:19 +0000 artappraiser comment 267406 at http://dagblog.com Hewitt's op-ed is still on http://dagblog.com/comment/267402#comment-267402 <a id="comment-267402"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/2020-election-isn-t-going-be-close-28031">&quot;The 2020 election isn’t going to be close&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hewitt's op-ed is still on WaPo's "most read" list more than 24 hrs. after publication. It's really hitting some points people are thinking about.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 29 Apr 2019 04:05:19 +0000 artappraiser comment 267402 at http://dagblog.com Interesting exchange between http://dagblog.com/comment/267392#comment-267392 <a id="comment-267392"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/2020-election-isn-t-going-be-close-28031">&quot;The 2020 election isn’t going to be close&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Interesting exchange between NYTimes opinion writer Jamelle Bouie and a reader who finds many Dem attacks on Trump and GOP offensive:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Reader response to my latest is very fun. <a href="https://t.co/IiT5aVdtMu">pic.twitter.com/IiT5aVdtMu</a></p> — b-boy bouiebaisse (@jbouie) <a href="https://twitter.com/jbouie/status/1122651643605135360?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 28, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>This reply comes from someone who doesn’t appear to be a mouth breather but who does seem to combine poor reading comprehension with an ability to be very condescending. Couldn’t help but send a response. <a href="https://t.co/GMsNugol9R">pic.twitter.com/GMsNugol9R</a></p> — b-boy bouiebaisse (@jbouie) <a href="https://twitter.com/jbouie/status/1122652967310712839?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 29, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:37:02 +0000 artappraiser comment 267392 at http://dagblog.com