dagblog - Comments for "How Far Will Trump Go?"

Well she did pull one over on

PeraclesPlease — Thu, 09 May 2019 05:48:49 +0000

Well she did pull one over on the American people - the ultimate power grab - having her own email server. That' like even worse than cutting in line for Olive Tree sunday brunch - total authoritarian tendencies. Can you imagine if the Clintons got away with that, they might have turned Chappaqua into some brazen playground for policy wonks where they worked on weekends. How anti-union can you get. We really dodged a bullet there.

Josh Marshall has already

jollyroger — Thu, 09 May 2019 05:47:08 +0000

In reply to How Far Will Trump Go?

Josh Marshall has already conveyed his confidence that if Trump can bring any colorable claim to the Supreme Court they will sustain it.

One may imagine that while we take some comfort in our decentralized, and thus hard to "fix" electoral structure, the fabrication of a colorable "contest" (ie, referral to the courts/court) of the outcome in any given state may be supported by the introduction of a "clumsy", and therefor detected, hack ostensibly undertaken in support of the Dem.

Cry havoc, and let loose the dogs of litigation.

Pence basically tells the

artappraiser — Thu, 09 May 2019 01:04:56 +0000

In reply to How Far Will Trump Go?

Pence basically tells the Federalist Society the plan is to go as far as they can:

The administration wages all-out war on every constraint on the presidency. Trump's pursuit of power has one goal: more. People skilled at rationalizing will help him, and the gulf between what he wants to do and what he can do will narrow. Unless https://t.co/UADr2a36dS
— Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) May 9, 2019

Nancy sort of addresses the

artappraiser — Wed, 08 May 2019 23:50:35 +0000

In reply to How Far Will Trump Go?

Nancy sort of addresses the question in your title:

Pelosi: Trump is becoming 'self-impeachable' @ Politico.com, 05/08/2019 09:21 AM EDT

Feeling sorry for your

artappraiser — Wed, 08 May 2019 23:42:29 +0000

In reply to PP, threatening to kill the

Feeling sorry for your obviously neurological syntax disorder, fixed it for you:

Fox News has a poorly hidden anti-Trump bias

should read

Trump has a poorly hidden pro-Fox News bias

Unfortunately I can't help with the paranoid delusions:

The Red Queen and most of the deep state cult are powerless and unable to continue the coverup that shielded them all from exposure and justice.

Oh right - Hillary had the

PeraclesPlease — Wed, 08 May 2019 17:10:38 +0000

In reply to PP, threatening to kill the

Oh right - Hillary had the perfect scam, bring in Veletskaya to Fusion, and then hold a meeting with the Trump Team in Trump Tower and then KEEP IT AS QUIET AS A MOTHERFUCKING MOUSE UNTIL AFTER SHE'D LOST THE ELECTION!!! That'll show him.

Really, Peter - just piss off.

PP, threatening to kill the

Peter — Wed, 08 May 2019 16:43:48 +0000

In reply to Bull fucking shit. She *may*

PP, threatening to kill the messenger won't save you or anyone else from the reckoning for the real crimes and abuses of power committed by the Obama/Biden regime.There's too much documented evidence and too few deep state actors remaining in positions of power to cover up these crimes and even Bob Woodward is demanding a thorough investigation.

Fox News has a poorly hidden anti-Trump bias but their straight news reporting seems accurate and factual. FYI Veletskaya met with Glenn Simpson just hours before the Tower meeting and again soon after that and she also carried a memo outlining the, probably bogus, dirt on the Clinton campaign that was written by Fusion GPS. This looks like another push-pull operation to inject supposed Russian supplied information into the Trump campaign and extract it as evidence of collusion. Both Jr and Papadoc rejected the tainted bait but that didn't stop the fake news media from using it to further the collusion delusion.

The Obama/Biden corruption and weaponizing of the IC, to attack his political opponents here and abroad began years before Trump sought the presidency and involved some of the same players and targets as after Trump became president. The Red Queen and most of the deep state cult are powerless and unable to continue the coverup that shielded them all from exposure and justice.

Ha! I feel honored! (did Mark

PeraclesPlease — Mon, 06 May 2019 02:22:45 +0000

In reply to Oh look, it's Peracles of

Ha! I feel honored! (did Mark say "fuck"?)

Oh look, it's Peracles of

artappraiser — Sun, 05 May 2019 23:48:10 +0000

In reply to Bull fucking shit. She *may*

Oh look, it's ~~Peracles of Dagblog~~ Mark Mazzetti of NYTimes vs. ~~Peter (Unverified)~~ Maria Bartiromo of Fox:

Some people perhaps need to do some research before conducting some interviews https://t.co/2WK5R2F9oC
— Mark Mazzetti (@MarkMazzettiNYT) May 5, 2019

No need for Peter to read the

artappraiser — Sun, 05 May 2019 21:29:53 +0000

In reply to Shame you were too lazy to

No need for Peter to read the whole Mueller report, all he needs to reconcile with his spin is this one-paragraph conclusion from it:

Does not exonerate him pic.twitter.com/XA9976DiM9
— Laura Rozen (@lrozen) May 5, 2019