dagblog - Comments for "This time Trump was telling the truth" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/time-trump-was-telling-truth-28120 Comments for "This time Trump was telling the truth" en What are we getting in http://dagblog.com/comment/269288#comment-269288 <a id="comment-269288"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/time-trump-was-telling-truth-28120">This time Trump was telling the truth</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">What are we getting in exchange for the having the leader of the free world deliver a genocidal and isolated dictator a priceless political/PR victory -- putting him on equal footing with the United States? <a href="https://t.co/WldYWjLorT">https://t.co/WldYWjLorT</a></p> — Glenn Thrush (@GlennThrush) <a href="https://twitter.com/GlennThrush/status/1145513911870992384?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 01 Jul 2019 02:22:51 +0000 artappraiser comment 269288 at http://dagblog.com Humph! http://dagblog.com/comment/267712#comment-267712 <a id="comment-267712"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/267701#comment-267701">Thanks for the clarity.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Humph!</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 13 May 2019 00:15:01 +0000 Flavius comment 267712 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for the clarity. http://dagblog.com/comment/267701#comment-267701 <a id="comment-267701"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/267699#comment-267699">Yeah.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for the clarity.</p> <p>This reminds me that there have been a variety of attempts to look into the use of shell corporations by Trump Org. But this is a well protected area of business law. The offshore banks who do that sort of thing are only exposed if money laundering reaches such a scale that the chain of ownership is revealed.</p> <p>In your experience in corporate finance, was this method of hiding wealth something "everybody" did or a playground for outliers?</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 11 May 2019 22:46:40 +0000 moat comment 267701 at http://dagblog.com Yeah. http://dagblog.com/comment/267699#comment-267699 <a id="comment-267699"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/267698#comment-267698">If I understand you correctly</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah.</p> <p>1. Decrease your income by depositing receipts  elsewhere, away, </p> <p>2.Taxes eliminated, but then how do you pay the creditors- and your book keeper?</p> <p>3.So  replace the missing cash with opaque loans . low interest because secured ,back to back , by those offshore funds . </p> <p>There's no such thing as operating year after year at a loss.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 11 May 2019 14:43:41 +0000 Flavius comment 267699 at http://dagblog.com If I understand you correctly http://dagblog.com/comment/267698#comment-267698 <a id="comment-267698"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/time-trump-was-telling-truth-28120">This time Trump was telling the truth</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If I understand you correctly, the generally adopted methods of cheating on taxes at the time were designed to avoid the stifling of credit.</p> <p>So this was something else. And some banks saw it as an opportunity.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 11 May 2019 01:57:24 +0000 moat comment 267698 at http://dagblog.com We need the taxes to see if http://dagblog.com/comment/267695#comment-267695 <a id="comment-267695"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/267693#comment-267693">I agree with every word about</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We need the taxes to see if he is being supported by dubious financial institutions or foreign governments. The idea that losing $1 billion is a wise tax avoidance strategy is insane. He would have made a profit leaving the money untouched in a savings account or investing in other corporations.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 May 2019 15:23:12 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 267695 at http://dagblog.com I agree with every word about http://dagblog.com/comment/267693#comment-267693 <a id="comment-267693"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/267690#comment-267690">Trump is a horrible</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I agree with every word about Trump' s  character but go tilt about his ability to operate  that long with the losses reported in the Times. Since he lies on everything else why think he told the truth to the IRS?</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 May 2019 14:49:09 +0000 Flavius comment 267693 at http://dagblog.com Trump is a horrible http://dagblog.com/comment/267690#comment-267690 <a id="comment-267690"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/time-trump-was-telling-truth-28120">This time Trump was telling the truth</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump is a horrible businessman. His business losses are historic. His supporters will still stand by his side. They do not care that he lies. We are nearing a Constitutional crisis. If the courts do not support the attempted oversight by Congress, the crisis will be punching us in the face. Some Trump supporters may realize that they are supporting a con man, but most will not. Democrats will have to mobilize other Democrats and Independents to vote Trump out of office. The bulk of the Republican Party has joined the cult.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 May 2019 12:51:01 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 267690 at http://dagblog.com