dagblog - Comments for "Deutsche Bank Staff Saw Suspicious Activity in Trump and Kushner Accounts" http://dagblog.com/link/deutsche-bank-staff-saw-suspicious-activity-trump-and-kushner-accounts-28179 Comments for "Deutsche Bank Staff Saw Suspicious Activity in Trump and Kushner Accounts" en "Slowing down" certainly does http://dagblog.com/comment/268000#comment-268000 <a id="comment-268000"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/267998#comment-267998">The sharp smack downs have</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"Slowing down" certainly does seem to be the only plan of lawyers for the administration. Even if what's required to do that hurts their own reputation with colleagues and judiciary.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 24 May 2019 00:10:26 +0000 artappraiser comment 268000 at http://dagblog.com The sharp smack downs have http://dagblog.com/comment/267998#comment-267998 <a id="comment-267998"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/267986#comment-267986">Courts are not just ruling</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The sharp smack downs have got to make the crew facing appeal nervous about it happening again.</p> <p>I wonder if the next iteration is planning on losing less spectacularly. Something to slow it down before it gets to the Supreme Court.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 May 2019 23:24:20 +0000 moat comment 267998 at http://dagblog.com Courts are not just ruling http://dagblog.com/comment/267986#comment-267986 <a id="comment-267986"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/267979#comment-267979">Judge rejects Trump’s request</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Courts are not just ruling against Trump. Courts are mocking his lawyers’ arguments. As they should.</p> — Preet Bharara (@PreetBharara) <a href="https://twitter.com/PreetBharara/status/1131400415390646272?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 23, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 May 2019 03:36:04 +0000 artappraiser comment 267986 at http://dagblog.com Judge rejects Trump’s request http://dagblog.com/comment/267979#comment-267979 <a id="comment-267979"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/deutsche-bank-staff-saw-suspicious-activity-trump-and-kushner-accounts-28179">Deutsche Bank Staff Saw Suspicious Activity in Trump and Kushner Accounts</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/judge-rejects-trumps-request-to-halt-congressional-subpoenas-for-his-banking-records/2019/05/22/28f9b93a-7ccd-11e9-8bb7-0fc796cf2ec0_story.html?utm_term=.47dd65704c26">Judge rejects Trump’s request to halt congressional subpoenas for his banking records</a></p> <p>By Renae Merle, Michael Kranish &amp; Felicia Sonmez @ WashingtonPost.com, May 22 at 7:29 PM</p> <blockquote> <p>NEW YORK — A federal judge on Wednesday rejected a request by President Trump to block congressional subpoenas for his banking records, dealing the latest blow to the president in his bid to battle Democratic investigations into his personal finances.</p> <p>The decision in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York could clear the way for Deutsche Bank and Capital One to hand over the president’s financial records to Democrats in the House. Trump’s attorneys could appeal the decision.</p> <p>Attorneys for Trump, his family and the Trump Organization <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trumps-lawyers-ask-for-a-preliminary-injunction-to-block-subpoenas-of-deutsche-bank-capital-one/2019/05/03/c4bfe31e-6dee-11e9-be3a-33217240a539_story.html?utm_term=.d019d09eac06" title="www.washingtonpost.com">filed for a preliminary injunction</a> earlier this month as part of a lawsuit seeking to block the two institutions from handing over documents to the House Financial Services and Intelligence committees [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 May 2019 02:38:27 +0000 artappraiser comment 267979 at http://dagblog.com #1 most popular story @ http://dagblog.com/comment/267961#comment-267961 <a id="comment-267961"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/deutsche-bank-staff-saw-suspicious-activity-trump-and-kushner-accounts-28179">Deutsche Bank Staff Saw Suspicious Activity in Trump and Kushner Accounts</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>#1 most popular story @ Politico.com right now: <a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/20/donald-trump-twitter-deutsche-bank-1334358">Trump lashes out after report bank found suspicious transactions</a></p> <p>Updated 05/20/2019 05:12 PM EDT</p> <blockquote> <p>President Donald Trump lashed out at The New York Times on Monday, disputing the paper’s reporting on his relationship with Deutsche Bank and launching into a broader criticism of the news media [....]</p> <p>In a string of tweets Monday, the president pushed back on the paper’s characterization of his relationship with Deutsche Bank [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Tue, 21 May 2019 02:02:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 267961 at http://dagblog.com The Times reminds in a cross http://dagblog.com/comment/267959#comment-267959 <a id="comment-267959"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/deutsche-bank-staff-saw-suspicious-activity-trump-and-kushner-accounts-28179">Deutsche Bank Staff Saw Suspicious Activity in Trump and Kushner Accounts</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Times reminds in a cross link that they continue to do this, just updated May 20:</p> <p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/05/13/us/politics/trump-investigations.html">Tracking 29 Investigations Related to Trump</a></p> <p>By LARRY BUCHANAN and KAREN YOURISH UPDATED MAY 20, 2019</p> <blockquote> <p>Federal, state and congressional authorities are scrutinizing many aspects of Donald J. Trump’s life through investigations related to his businesses, campaign, inauguration and presidency. We’ll be tracking them here. According to reporting by The New York Times, there are currently at least:</p> <p>10 FEDERAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS</p> <p>8 STATE AND LOCAL INVESTIGATIONS</p> <p>11 CONGRESSIONAL  INVESTIGATIONS</p> <p>Latest</p> <p>A Federal District Court judge ruled on May 20 that Mr. Trump’s accounting firm must <u>turn over his financial </u><u>records </u>to Congress. <u>See more</u></p> <p>Mr. Trump directed his former White House counsel to <u>defy a congressional subpoena</u> and skip a House Judiciary Committee hearing that was scheduled for May 21. <u>See more</u></p> <p>[.....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Tue, 21 May 2019 01:47:10 +0000 artappraiser comment 267959 at http://dagblog.com