http://dagblog.com/link/44-trump-agrees-mueller-28213 Comments for "4/4: Trump agrees with Mueller" en http://dagblog.com/comment/268110#comment-268110 <a id="comment-268110"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/268107#comment-268107">Er, I am confused as what she</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>More Trump agreed these 4 were up to something no good and fired them - now wants to call it a "witch hunt".</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 26 May 2019 15:24:47 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 268110 at http://dagblog.com http://dagblog.com/comment/268107#comment-268107 <a id="comment-268107"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/44-trump-agrees-mueller-28213">4/4: Trump agrees with Mueller</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Er, I am confused as what she says here is confirming "no collusion"  and that the Mueller report clears him. Thereafter, Trumpco feels unfairly targeted, as they fired everybody with Russian ties once they found out. Any obstruction claims could be argued as Trumpco just trying to stop silly poking into stuff when they know they did no wrong? What he's ordering Barr to do here, we still don't know/understand exactly yet.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 26 May 2019 14:46:45 +0000 artappraiser comment 268107 at http://dagblog.com