dagblog - Comments for "Biden slams critics of working with GOP: &#039;Why don&#039;t you all go home then, man?&#039;" http://dagblog.com/link/biden-slams-critics-working-gop-why-dont-you-all-go-home-then-man-28398 Comments for "Biden slams critics of working with GOP: 'Why don't you all go home then, man?'" en You have a concrete thought http://dagblog.com/comment/268975#comment-268975 <a id="comment-268975"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/268973#comment-268973">their deep-seated belief </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You have a concrete thought process. The intended message is very clear.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 24 Jun 2019 00:17:38 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 268975 at http://dagblog.com their deep-seated belief http://dagblog.com/comment/268973#comment-268973 <a id="comment-268973"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/268972#comment-268972">I pointed you to a link</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><strong>their deep-seated belief “that America is still a very racist place and a very misogynistic place and that a candidate who doesn’t get any white votes is probably going to lose.”</strong></p> <p>I think that is a ridiculously stupid statement. You apparently think it's smart. I thought it was so stupid I didn't bother to read the article. You thought it was so insightful that you chose it to paste here over every other sentence in the article. Probably? You actually think that if a candidate gets no white votes it's only probable they'll lose. Clearly most of the votes that Harris and Booker got to win their senate seat were white. So how does this idea that a candidate <strong>who doesn’t get any white votes is probably going to lose </strong>apply to your arguments here?</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 23 Jun 2019 23:44:28 +0000 ocean-kat comment 268973 at http://dagblog.com I pointed you to a link http://dagblog.com/comment/268972#comment-268972 <a id="comment-268972"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/268960#comment-268960">You actually think the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I pointed you to a link provided in an article from 538. You hurl insults.You are simply a blowhard.</p> <p>The author talked to potential black voters and recorded their statements. The author has something valuable to add to the discussion.</p> <p>The House held a panel discussing reparations because people see institutional racism as a problem</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 23 Jun 2019 23:13:03 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 268972 at http://dagblog.com Biden worked with Eastland on http://dagblog.com/comment/268971#comment-268971 <a id="comment-268971"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/268964#comment-268964">PP getting all muddled up by</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Biden worked with Eastland on anti-busing legislation. How is that agitprop?</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 23 Jun 2019 22:55:43 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 268971 at http://dagblog.com You are making a good case http://dagblog.com/comment/268970#comment-268970 <a id="comment-268970"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/268967#comment-268967">Like is it worse what Biden</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You are making a good case against Biden. He screwed up the Anita Hill Case. He didn’t think that supporting the Hyde amendment would be a problem in 2019. Now he wanted an apology from Booker.</p> <p>Working with Eastland on anti-busing legislation is not a small matter. Biden has appeal and name recognition with older black voters. He is now being evalated by young black voters. If he worked with white supremacists on anti-busing bills, why should young black voters trust Biden, now without the influence of Obama, to deal with McConnell.</p> <p>Clyburn is Democratic leadership, like Pelosi. Neither person is going to openly criticize a Democratic candidate for president. It will be interesting to see if Biden just gave Booker a boost. Booker too tot high ground, saying that he was done with the issue, but also noting that we were aiming for the future not the good old days of both Eastland and Obama that Biden finds pleasant.</p> <p>It does not seem that Biden paints himself in glory.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 23 Jun 2019 22:54:11 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 268970 at http://dagblog.com Like is it worse what Biden http://dagblog.com/comment/268967#comment-268967 <a id="comment-268967"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/268964#comment-268964">PP getting all muddled up by</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Like is it worse what Biden did with Eastman or enabling Clarence Thomas?</p> <p><a href="https://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2019/06/clarence-thomas-lights-match-to-stare.html">https://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2019/06/clarence-thomas-lights-match-to-...</a></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 23 Jun 2019 20:27:46 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 268967 at http://dagblog.com PP getting all muddled up by http://dagblog.com/comment/268964#comment-268964 <a id="comment-268964"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/268962#comment-268962">Realistically, Senate leader</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>PP getting all muddled up by reality.</em></p> <p>Reality: it's complicated, lots of gray shades, doesn't follow a nice neat black/white agitprop narrative. <img alt="wink" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.png" title="wink" width="23" /></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 23 Jun 2019 20:08:42 +0000 artappraiser comment 268964 at http://dagblog.com Realistically, Senate leader http://dagblog.com/comment/268962#comment-268962 <a id="comment-268962"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/268961#comment-268961">In your view Biden working</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Realistically, Senate leader/Trump enabler/supreme court justice-stealer McConnell's probably done much more damage to minorities than Eastland could muster as a mere Senator (things that wouldn't have happened by other southerners anyway), especially in the later years that Biden knew him. But that's just PP getting all muddled up by reality.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 23 Jun 2019 19:48:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 268962 at http://dagblog.com In your view Biden working http://dagblog.com/comment/268961#comment-268961 <a id="comment-268961"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/268958#comment-268958">And AOC approached Ted Cruz</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In your view Biden working with a white supremacist on anti busing legislation is the same as Pelosi, Schumer, and Pelosi?</p> <p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/21/us/politics/joe-biden-james-eastland.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/21/us/politics/joe-biden-james-eastland.html</a></p> <p>I suppose you consider Diamond and Silk identical to other black pundits, and not a minstrel show?</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 23 Jun 2019 19:21:39 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 268961 at http://dagblog.com You actually think the http://dagblog.com/comment/268960#comment-268960 <a id="comment-268960"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/268957#comment-268957">Amusing as always. Here is a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You actually think the jackass that wrote that article has something to add to this discussion, amazing. Of course a candidate that gets no white votes is going to lose. If Harris and Booker get no white votes it makes one wonder how they won elections before. Are you really saying that blacks think America is so racist that Harris and Booker will get no white votes? As usual conversations with you get to stupid to continue very fast.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 23 Jun 2019 19:20:13 +0000 ocean-kat comment 268960 at http://dagblog.com