dagblog - Comments for "Supreme Court rules in case watched for impact on Trump pardons" http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-rules-case-watched-impact-trump-pardons-28401 Comments for "Supreme Court rules in case watched for impact on Trump pardons" en Nina Totenb​erg on all the http://dagblog.com/comment/268747#comment-268747 <a id="comment-268747"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-rules-case-watched-impact-trump-pardons-28401">Supreme Court rules in case watched for impact on Trump pardons</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nina Totenb​erg on all the rulings today in general:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Forget those 5-4 liberal/conservative splits, at least for a day. Three of four <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SCOTUS?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SCOTUS</a> split decisions today were with libs joining conservatives and vice versa. <a href="https://t.co/msXJjF1GIH">https://t.co/msXJjF1GIH</a></p> — Nina Totenberg (@NinaTotenberg) <a href="https://twitter.com/NinaTotenberg/status/1140721144062009345?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 17, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Three weeks ago <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SCOTUS?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SCOTUS</a> Clarence weighed in for 20 pgs linking abortion w eugenics. Today he spent 17 pgs, in concurring opinion, decrying stare decisis as a doctrine that "elevates demonstrably erroneous decisions...over the text of the Constitution."</p> — Nina Totenberg (@NinaTotenberg) <a href="https://twitter.com/NinaTotenberg/status/1140756215049400321?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 17, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>She notes that there are 20 more to come by the end of the month:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">And you think you wait until the last minute! <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SCOTUS?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SCOTUS</a> still has 20 outstanding cases to rule on before the expected end of the term, no later than June 29. Yikes!</p> — Nina Totenberg (@NinaTotenberg) <a href="https://twitter.com/NinaTotenberg/status/1140723299514822658?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 17, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 18 Jun 2019 05:42:03 +0000 artappraiser comment 268747 at http://dagblog.com Neal Katyal: significant bad http://dagblog.com/comment/268746#comment-268746 <a id="comment-268746"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-rules-case-watched-impact-trump-pardons-28401">Supreme Court rules in case watched for impact on Trump pardons</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Neal Katyal: significant bad news for Trump:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">As <a href="https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AshaRangappa_</a> has powerfully written, today’s US Supreme Court decision is significant bad news for Trump, especially now that legislative action has been taken to end the pardon loophole in NY. <a href="https://t.co/pKwILgkZtQ">https://t.co/pKwILgkZtQ</a></p> — Neal Katyal (@neal_katyal) <a href="https://twitter.com/neal_katyal/status/1140687794051923968?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 17, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 18 Jun 2019 05:38:11 +0000 artappraiser comment 268746 at http://dagblog.com