dagblog - Comments for "Dems to grill Hope Hicks on alleged Trump obstruction" http://dagblog.com/link/dems-grill-hope-hicks-alleged-trump-obstruction-28409 Comments for "Dems to grill Hope Hicks on alleged Trump obstruction" en Dems warn they will go to http://dagblog.com/comment/268829#comment-268829 <a id="comment-268829"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/dems-grill-hope-hicks-alleged-trump-obstruction-28409">Dems to grill Hope Hicks on alleged Trump obstruction</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Dems warn they will go to court over WH move to prevent Hicks from answering questions today about her time in the WH. Cicilline: "There is no such thing as absolute immunity." <a href="https://t.co/ojbIRK04OI">pic.twitter.com/ojbIRK04OI</a></p> — Manu Raju (@mkraju) <a href="https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1141382981308702721?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 19, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:10:29 +0000 artappraiser comment 268829 at http://dagblog.com 'It’s a farce': Dems livid as http://dagblog.com/comment/268820#comment-268820 <a id="comment-268820"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/dems-grill-hope-hicks-alleged-trump-obstruction-28409">Dems to grill Hope Hicks on alleged Trump obstruction</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/19/hope-hicks-testimony-trump-oversight-1368164">'It’s a farce': Dems livid as Hope Hicks dodges questions</a></p> <p><em>The president's former longtime confidante met with lawmakers behind closed doors to discuss the president's alleged efforts to thwart Mueller's Russia probe.</em></p> <p>By Kyle Cheney and Andrew Desidero @ Politico.com, Updated 06/19/2019 11:54 AM EDT</p> <blockquote> <p>House<strong> </strong>Democrats erupted Wednesday at what they said was the White House’s repeated interference in their interview with Hope Hicks, a longtime confidante of President Donald Trump who was a central witness in special counsel Robert Mueller’s obstruction of justice investigation.</p> <p>Several House Judiciary Committee members exiting the closed-door interview said a White House lawyer repeatedly claimed Hicks had blanket immunity from discussing her time in the White House. They said she wouldn’t answer questions as basic as where she sat in the West Wing or whether she told the truth to Mueller.</p> <p>“We’re watching obstruction of justice in action,” said Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.).</p> <p>“It’s a farce,” added Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), who said Hicks at one point tried to answer a question about an episode involving former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski only to be cut off by the White House counsel.</p> <p>“She made clear she wouldn’t answer a single question about her time unless the White House counsel told her it was okay,” an exasperated Rep. Ted Deutch (D-Fla.) said in an interview. “She couldn’t even characterize her testimony to the special counsel.”</p> <p>Deutch added that [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:41:26 +0000 artappraiser comment 268820 at http://dagblog.com Reposting upon learning that http://dagblog.com/comment/268788#comment-268788 <a id="comment-268788"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/dems-grill-hope-hicks-alleged-trump-obstruction-28409">Dems to grill Hope Hicks on alleged Trump obstruction</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Reposting upon learning that the “most transparent” administration ever, believe me, everyone says so, is asserting immunity for Hope Hicks for her testimony before Congress tomorrow. Because nothing says “nothing to see here” like “we don’t want you to see the things here”. <a href="https://t.co/AGiWvJ0nG4">pic.twitter.com/AGiWvJ0nG4</a></p> — TheDailyDon (@JRDuquette) <a href="https://twitter.com/JRDuquette/status/111094024314609664?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:24:22 +0000 artappraiser comment 268788 at http://dagblog.com Here's @jshaub on testimonial http://dagblog.com/comment/268787#comment-268787 <a id="comment-268787"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/dems-grill-hope-hicks-alleged-trump-obstruction-28409">Dems to grill Hope Hicks on alleged Trump obstruction</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Here's <a href="https://twitter.com/jshaub?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@jshaub</a> on testimonial immunity for presidential advisors: "Justifying immunity for ... [Hope] Hicks based on existing precedent would be more difficult." <a href="https://t.co/WvQJ0FU18d">https://t.co/WvQJ0FU18d</a> <a href="https://t.co/Hx97VVa069">https://t.co/Hx97VVa069</a></p> — Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic) <a href="https://twitter.com/qjurecic/status/1141092481054007297?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:23:14 +0000 artappraiser comment 268787 at http://dagblog.com