dagblog - Comments for "The 2020 Endorsement Primary: " http://dagblog.com/link/2020-endorsement-primary-28463 Comments for "The 2020 Endorsement Primary: " en I understand the good reasons http://dagblog.com/comment/269001#comment-269001 <a id="comment-269001"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/268999#comment-268999">I think 538&#039;s reasons are all</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I understand the good reasons for this, as I did 3-4 years ago - but now it just irritates me to no end.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:53:05 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 269001 at http://dagblog.com I think 538's reasons are all http://dagblog.com/comment/268999#comment-268999 <a id="comment-268999"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/268991#comment-268991">I don&#039;t follow endorsements</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think 538's reasons are all good:</p> <p><em>Why we’re tracking endorsements</em></p> <ul><li> <ul><li><em>Party elites use endorsements to influence not only voters but also each other, hoping to get other powerful party members to rally behind the candidate they think would be most acceptable.</em></li> </ul></li> <li> <ul><li><em>The pace of endorsements — whether leaders coalesce early around a single candidate or are backing a variety of candidates — can indicate how drawn out the primary season will be.</em></li> </ul></li> <li> <ul><li><em>A lack of a consensus can mean that party leaders’ first-choice candidate may have more trouble securing the nomination.</em></li> </ul></li> <li>Also, seeing them made me realize that in normal times--that is, when we don't have a severe nut case for president who as part of his sanity problem is that he isn't loyal to anyone but himself and draws all the air out of the country and turns traditional party ideology upside down, etc.--these intraparty relationships tell you a lot more about power in the government among those who actually hold it, and they are not the president. Traditionally, the most important thing the president does, where he/she only matters: federal court appointments; foreign policy. And it would be less of the latter if Congress did what it was supposed to do on interventions. The president doesn't run this country as far as what matters to most people's lives, period. The presidential race, it's a kabuki show. Who your Congressional reps. are and what party controls Congress is far far more important.</li> </ul></div></div></div> Mon, 24 Jun 2019 07:47:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 268999 at http://dagblog.com I don't follow endorsements http://dagblog.com/comment/268991#comment-268991 <a id="comment-268991"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/2020-endorsement-primary-28463">The 2020 Endorsement Primary: </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't follow endorsements anymore. Seriously. It just pisses me off after 2016, when Hillary went to the trouble of lining up a whole diverse cast of endorsements, including most of our federal elected leaders, union leaders, planned parenthood, et al - it was just turned into her being "anointed", how those are just the elite leaders, how the common people disagreed. Fuck Bernie. I'll pay attention to something else. And I don't give a shit about who endorses fuckall. He and most all of them are dead to me.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 24 Jun 2019 06:18:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 268991 at http://dagblog.com