dagblog - Comments for "What We’re Watching For In The First Democratic Debates: FiveThirtyEight" http://dagblog.com/link/what-we-re-watching-first-democratic-debates-fivethirtyeight-28493 Comments for "What We’re Watching For In The First Democratic Debates: FiveThirtyEight" en Democrats Couldn’t Agree on http://dagblog.com/comment/269114#comment-269114 <a id="comment-269114"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/what-we-re-watching-first-democratic-debates-fivethirtyeight-28493">What We’re Watching For In The First Democratic Debates: FiveThirtyEight</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/06/democratic-candidates-identify-national-security-threats/592702/">Democrats Couldn’t Agree on Top National-Security Threats</a></p> <p><em>The candidates’ different answers reflect the Democratic Party’s deeper divisions on foreign policy.</em></p> <p>By <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/author/kathy-gilsinan/">KATHY GILSINAN</a> @ TheAtlantic.com,  JUN 26, 2019</p> <p><a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/06/2020-democrats-abortion-debate/592696/">Democrats Avoided the Toughest Debate Questions on Abortion</a></p> <p><em>In part one of the Democratic Party’s first primary debates, the candidates did not go deep on substance.</em></p> <p>By <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/author/emma-green/">EMMA GREEN</a> @ TheAtlantic.com, JUN 26, 2019</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 27 Jun 2019 06:49:21 +0000 artappraiser comment 269114 at http://dagblog.com and The Onion itself is http://dagblog.com/comment/269094#comment-269094 <a id="comment-269094"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/269092#comment-269092">from NPR&#039;s presidential</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>and The Onion itself is pointing out the reality of our system:the people want their kabuki, they want the circus along with the bread:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The Onion continues their great political coverage. <a href="https://t.co/o4GbmH44lp">https://t.co/o4GbmH44lp</a> <a href="https://t.co/P86sGrwZCk">pic.twitter.com/P86sGrwZCk</a></p> — andrew kaczynski (@KFILE) <a href="https://twitter.com/KFILE/status/1143944378853023745?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 26, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div>   <p>And given that the political news media is dependent more than ever on ratings/clicks, don't be surprised when faux drama is given at least equal coverage to "policy." No media co. is going to pay their electric bills covering "serious policy" just as few important votes are gotten with white papers on foreign policy.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Jun 2019 18:18:33 +0000 artappraiser comment 269094 at http://dagblog.com from NPR's presidential http://dagblog.com/comment/269092#comment-269092 <a id="comment-269092"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/what-we-re-watching-first-democratic-debates-fivethirtyeight-28493">What We’re Watching For In The First Democratic Debates: FiveThirtyEight</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>from NPR's presidential campaign reporter, so not The Onion:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Ouch. <a href="https://t.co/AUt4fsnMle">https://t.co/AUt4fsnMle</a></p> — Seth Masket (@smotus) <a href="https://twitter.com/smotus/status/1143946285856112641?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 26, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Jun 2019 18:09:56 +0000 artappraiser comment 269092 at http://dagblog.com Quite the opposites, but http://dagblog.com/comment/269071#comment-269071 <a id="comment-269071"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/269069#comment-269069">I&#039;m really looking forward to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Quite the opposites, but whatevs, I'm not going to waste too much energy making sense of it all.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:41:48 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 269071 at http://dagblog.com I'm really looking forward to http://dagblog.com/comment/269069#comment-269069 <a id="comment-269069"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/what-we-re-watching-first-democratic-debates-fivethirtyeight-28493">What We’re Watching For In The First Democratic Debates: FiveThirtyEight</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm really looking forward to seeing Andrew Yang and Tulsi Gabbard in action. Two excellent candidates.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:39:48 +0000 Orion comment 269069 at http://dagblog.com weird byproduct of so many http://dagblog.com/comment/269067#comment-269067 <a id="comment-269067"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/what-we-re-watching-first-democratic-debates-fivethirtyeight-28493">What We’re Watching For In The First Democratic Debates: FiveThirtyEight</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>weird byproduct of so many Senators running for president:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Sen. Thune says Schumer is trying to delay votes on defense, Iran, and the supplemental until Friday to allow Democratic presidential candidates to get back for the votes. Rs don’t love this idea <a href="https://t.co/z2x6hB13iI">https://t.co/z2x6hB13iI</a></p> — Burgess Everett (@burgessev) <a href="https://twitter.com/burgessev/status/1143892710211895297?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 26, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:34:43 +0000 artappraiser comment 269067 at http://dagblog.com