dagblog - Comments for "Why Is Booker Parroting Trump On Iran?" http://dagblog.com/link/why-booker-parroting-trump-iran-28529 Comments for "Why Is Booker Parroting Trump On Iran?" en Good anecdote. http://dagblog.com/comment/269293#comment-269293 <a id="comment-269293"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/269287#comment-269287">Booker would be excellent as</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Good anecdote.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 01 Jul 2019 05:00:29 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 269293 at http://dagblog.com Booker would be excellent as http://dagblog.com/comment/269287#comment-269287 <a id="comment-269287"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/why-booker-parroting-trump-iran-28529">Why Is Booker Parroting Trump On Iran?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Booker would be excellent as HUD Secretary, but he is not presidential material.  I was on a long drive during the Barr hearings, and Booker’s questions were all about getting Barr to agree to have a Blue Ribbon Commission on race. Booker did all the talking, and did not ask one single substantive question about what mattered, such as Barr’s obvious bias toward Executive Power.  </p> <p>Sure, Barr was going to be approved anyway, but Booker’s filibuster-style questions wasted everyone’s time.  Barr eventually gave his typical ‘non-answer answer’ to the one-track-mind questions.</p> <p>I can’t help but see him in this light every time he speaks. </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:11:33 +0000 CVille Dem comment 269287 at http://dagblog.com thanks for pointing the topic http://dagblog.com/comment/269251#comment-269251 <a id="comment-269251"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/why-booker-parroting-trump-iran-28529">Why Is Booker Parroting Trump On Iran?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>thanks for pointing the topic out, it's a good question Costello @ Lobe is asking and I wasn't aware it happened. But subsequently, I found that there is plenty of coverage, it's not like it's being ignored.Some other links, </p> <p><a href="https://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/Democratic-candidates-debate-Iran-deal-at-first-presidential-debate-593845">IRAN FACE-OFF AT FIRST DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE</a></p> <p><em>When NBC's moderators asked the candidates who would rejoin the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), all of them raised their hands except for Sen. Booker.</em></p> <p>By Omri Nahmias @ Jerusalem Post. JUNE 28, 2019</p> <p><a href="https://www.vox.com/2019/6/26/18760675/democratic-debate-2020-iran-deal-book">Why some Democrats criticized Obama’s Iran nuclear deal</a></p> <p><em>It was a stunning moment.</em></p> <p>By Alex Ward @ Vox.com, June 26</p> <p><a href="https://thinkprogress.org/cory-booker-answer-iran-nuclear-deal-democratic-debate-989b5689bb64/">Analysis: Why Cory Booker’s answer on the Iran deal was so troubling</a></p> <p><em>The New Jersey senator was the only candidate on stage who said he wouldn't rejoin the 2015 nuclear deal</em></p> <p>By D. Parvaz @ ThinkProgress.org, June 27</p> <p><a href="https://www.huffpost.com/entry/cory-booker-iran-deal-debate_n_5d142266e4b0d0a2c0ab7bde">Cory Booker Says He Won’t Necessarily Rejoin Obama’s Iran Deal</a></p> <p><em>The senator from New Jersey said he would try to craft a new agreement to address international concerns over the Islamic Republic’s nuclear capability.</em></p> <p>By Akbar Shahid Amed @ HuffPost.com, June 26</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:35:25 +0000 artappraiser comment 269251 at http://dagblog.com