dagblog - Comments for "Justice Department changing lawyers on census case" http://dagblog.com/link/justice-department-changing-lawyers-census-case-28619 Comments for "Justice Department changing lawyers on census case" en Wow. Judge Furman isn't http://dagblog.com/comment/269644#comment-269644 <a id="comment-269644"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/justice-department-changing-lawyers-census-case-28619">Justice Department changing lawyers on census case</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Wow. Judge Furman isn't letting DOJ lawyers out of the Census case without each lawyer filing a signed and sworn affidavit giving good reasons for withdrawing and promising to remain available to the court. <a href="https://t.co/AmiDcv9hf6">https://t.co/AmiDcv9hf6</a> <a href="https://t.co/BzJ2TLYaaW">pic.twitter.com/BzJ2TLYaaW</a></p> — Sasha Samberg-Champion (@ssamcham) <a href="https://twitter.com/ssamcham/status/1148705384531730433?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 9, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 09 Jul 2019 22:05:44 +0000 artappraiser comment 269644 at http://dagblog.com Barr is now encouraging a http://dagblog.com/comment/269617#comment-269617 <a id="comment-269617"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/269609#comment-269609">House Dems to pursue criminal</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Barr is now encouraging a lawless president to ignore the Supreme Court.<br /> It's time for the House to get off the can and impeach them both. <a href="https://t.co/vtQYygDN6l">https://t.co/vtQYygDN6l</a></p> — Richard W. Painter (@RWPUSA) <a href="https://twitter.com/RWPUSA/status/1148433496983199744?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 9, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I talked to former Justice Dept lawyers about the major shakeup in <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CitizenshipQuestion?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#CitizenshipQuestion</a> legal team.<br /><br /> “To reassign the trial team at this stage in litigation is — to not put too fine a point on it — insane," former DOJ lawyer Sam Oliker-Friedland said<a href="https://t.co/MM1FZIKNlh">https://t.co/MM1FZIKNlh</a></p> — Hansi Lo Wang (@hansilowang) <a href="https://twitter.com/hansilowang/status/1148433007767891968?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 9, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">“What they’re trying to do now is the textbook definition of a pretext — telling the court, ‘We plan to do this but we don’t know why yet.’ ” -Brennan Center expert <a href="https://twitter.com/tomTMwolf?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@tomTMwolf</a> <a href="https://t.co/qFVYdQ48Rk">https://t.co/qFVYdQ48Rk</a></p> — Brennan Center (@BrennanCenter) <a href="https://twitter.com/BrennanCenter/status/1148430324742930432?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 9, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 09 Jul 2019 03:33:51 +0000 artappraiser comment 269617 at http://dagblog.com Criminal contempt was viewed http://dagblog.com/comment/269611#comment-269611 <a id="comment-269611"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/269609#comment-269609">House Dems to pursue criminal</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Criminal contempt was viewed as quixotic, and even silly, by many Dems as recently as last month in part because federal prosecutors are unlikely to prosecute their own boss &gt;&gt;&gt; <a href="https://t.co/tSyjF2b44b">https://t.co/tSyjF2b44b</a></p> — Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) <a href="https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1148358940935237633?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 8, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 08 Jul 2019 22:49:27 +0000 artappraiser comment 269611 at http://dagblog.com House Dems to pursue criminal http://dagblog.com/comment/269609#comment-269609 <a id="comment-269609"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/justice-department-changing-lawyers-census-case-28619">Justice Department changing lawyers on census case</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">House Dems to pursue criminal contempt for William Barr, Wilbur Ross over census ⁦<a href="https://twitter.com/desiderioDC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@desiderioDC</a>⁩ &amp; me <a href="https://t.co/Wvd5vXFaNZ">https://t.co/Wvd5vXFaNZ</a></p> — John Bresnahan (@BresPolitico) <a href="https://twitter.com/BresPolitico/status/1148360996215558146?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 8, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 08 Jul 2019 22:42:00 +0000 artappraiser comment 269609 at http://dagblog.com