dagblog - Comments for "Some dodgy speculation re the may-not-exist Katie Johnson"

A bit late to purge this, but

PeraclesPlease — Fri, 19 Jul 2019 18:29:48 +0000

In reply to Some dodgy speculation re the may-not-exist Katie Johnson

A bit late to purge this, but the Katie Johnson case itself seems quite dodgy, via Jezebel

https://jezebel.com/heres-how-that-wild-lawsuit-accusing-trump-of-raping-a-1782447083

The Daily Mail ran with more, but then, that's their reputation.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3894806/Woman-alleged-raped-Donald-Trump-13-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-DROPS-case-casting-doubt-truth-claims.html

Shorter Pauley: "if you won't

PeraclesPlease — Fri, 19 Jul 2019 08:12:00 +0000

In reply to Trump's DOJ has no protector

Shorter Pauley: "if you won't do your job, I'll at least embarrass the shit out of you doing my job"

Trump's DOJ has no protector

artappraiser — Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:14:49 +0000

In reply to Maybe get Hopie Hicks back to

Trump's DOJ has no protector in Judge Pauley. From the Guardian article

The Department of Justice had tried to continue redacting the names of people who were not charged, but was ordered on Wednesday to reveal the information by Pauley.

“The campaign finance violations discussed in the materials are a matter of national importance,” Pauley wrote. “Now that the government’s investigation into those violations has concluded, it is time that every American has an opportunity to scrutinize the materials.”

just following his oath of office

Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, ___ ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ___ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 907; Pub. L. 101–650, title IV, § 404, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5124.)

Maybe get Hopie Hicks back to

PeraclesPlease — Thu, 18 Jul 2019 20:44:32 +0000

In reply to Some dodgy speculation re the may-not-exist Katie Johnson

Maybe get Hopie Hicks back to Congress to splain a few things *without* her goddamn givernment lawyer?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jul/18/trump-hope-hicks-stormy-...

As in why was Trump

PeraclesPlease — Thu, 18 Jul 2019 20:35:12 +0000

In reply to Some dodgy speculation re the may-not-exist Katie Johnson

As in why was Trump involvement dropped by SDNY without comment? Must be nice to have constant immunity from serious investigation. (but lets talk about racism some more, shall we?)

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5d30810be4b004b6adac33d1