dagblog - Comments for "The GOP Finally Rejects Trump" http://dagblog.com/link/gop-finally-rejects-trump-28728 Comments for "The GOP Finally Rejects Trump" en The Democrats budget deal was http://dagblog.com/comment/270036#comment-270036 <a id="comment-270036"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/gop-finally-rejects-trump-28728">The GOP Finally Rejects Trump</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Democrats budget deal was a huge failure and giveaway to Trump, That I don't see this argued <em>anywhere</em>, tells me the Democrats will always be doormats fo the right wing in this country.</p> <p>The budget and debt limit were the Democrats only power, and they didn't use it, they gave it up for the rest of Trump's term.</p> <p>Fox is now blaming the deficit on Democrats. Trump supporters believe it, and Republicans voting against the Bill supports that it is the Democrats forcing Trump to spend spend spend.</p> <p>Your Atlantic link is just simpleton nonsense. This is the same old Republican game they played with Obama. The GOP holds the "high ground" of voting no on the budget/deficit package, the Democrats play the sucker and meekly take the abuse for deficits at campaign time.</p> <p>Pelosi could have added a paltry claw back of the recent  GOP tax cut, a tiny $500 surtax on millionaire wage/capital gains income, to reduce the deficit. Then leave town for the recess.</p> <p>It would have been a message so stark and clear even the most under educated rabid Trump supporters would understand it.</p> <p>Fox News would have trouble explaining why the simple clawing back a tiny portion of the Trump tax cut from millionaires, if passed, will doom freedom, the troops, and the republic.</p> <p>Or that the country should go into default to save millionaires $500 bucks.</p> <p>But no, Pelosi gave Trump and the GOP the Democrats as the foil, and the Democrats gave a "clean Bill" which will basically neuter their power for this Congress.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 27 Jul 2019 15:48:23 +0000 NCD comment 270036 at http://dagblog.com Krugman, July 19: http://dagblog.com/comment/270031#comment-270031 <a id="comment-270031"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/gop-finally-rejects-trump-28728">The GOP Finally Rejects Trump</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Krugman, July 19:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">You have to be kidding. When Obama was prez, GOP demanded spending cuts as price of raising the debt ceiling. Now, with Trump in office, GOP is again demanding spending cuts as price of raising ceiling. No. If we hit ceiling, Trump owns it <a href="https://t.co/0rYHCU2q6Y">https://t.co/0rYHCU2q6Y</a></p> — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) <a href="https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1152255719305076736?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 19, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 27 Jul 2019 10:08:03 +0000 artappraiser comment 270031 at http://dagblog.com part of a July 22 thread by http://dagblog.com/comment/270030#comment-270030 <a id="comment-270030"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/gop-finally-rejects-trump-28728">The GOP Finally Rejects Trump</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>part of a July 22 thread by Liz Warren on economic issues:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">With an economy this vulnerable, we need to reduce the odds of the potential shocks that can send us into another downturn. That means Congress should eliminate the debt ceiling &amp; the Trump administration should replace its trade-war-by-tweet with China with a coherent strategy.</p> — Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) <a href="https://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1153273567808806913?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 22, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>and a comment on the debt ceiling deal by former deputy chief of staff for Harry Reid:</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Wait, Dems are going to clear the decks on government funding and debt ceiling for the remainder of Trump's term, forfeiting all leverage, but set up a major crisis point for Republicans in the first summer of a potential Dem presidents' term? This seems like a very bad idea. <a href="https://t.co/dKwFKilPyT">https://t.co/dKwFKilPyT</a></p> — Adam Jentleson (@AJentleson) <a href="https://twitter.com/AJentleson/status/1153334905608294402?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 22, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Sat, 27 Jul 2019 10:04:44 +0000 artappraiser comment 270030 at http://dagblog.com