dagblog - Comments for "What’s Become of All the Extreme Abortion Bans From This Year?" http://dagblog.com/link/what-s-become-all-extreme-abortion-bans-year-28959 Comments for "What’s Become of All the Extreme Abortion Bans From This Year?" en Judge Blocks North Dakota’s http://dagblog.com/comment/271240#comment-271240 <a id="comment-271240"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/what-s-become-all-extreme-abortion-bans-year-28959">What’s Become of All the Extreme Abortion Bans From This Year?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/judge-cancels-north-dakotas-anti-abortion-law-devoid-of-scientific-support-misleading-and-untrue/">Judge Blocks North Dakota’s Anti-Abortion Law: ‘Devoid of Scientific Support, Misleading and Untrue’</a> by Colin Kalmbacher @ LawandCrime.com, September 10th, 2019</p> <blockquote> <p>A federal court in North Dakota has blocked a controversial anti-abortion law from taking effect. The law required physicians to counsel patients that an abortion performed via medication could be reversed if they changed their mind during the procedure.</p> <p>Recently passed by the North Dakota legislature and signed into law by Republican Gov. <strong>Doug Burgum</strong>, the requirement effectively <a href="https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/09/north-dakota-judge-blocks-abortion-reversal-law.html">compelled doctors lie</a> to their abortion-seeking patients. There is, in fact, no way to reverse an abortion induced by medication.</p> <p>In <a href="https://reproductiverights.org/sites/default/files/2019-09/2019-09-10%20Order%20granting%20PI.pdf">a 24-page order</a> enjoining the law from taking effect, U.S. District Judge <strong>Daniel L. Hovland</strong> made a point to highlight that the so-called “abortion reversal” protocol mandated by <a href="https://rewire.news/legislative-tracker/law/north-dakota-bill-requiring-abortion-reversal-information-hb-1336/">House Bill 1336</a> “is devoid of scientific support, misleading, and untrue.”</p> <p>The terms of that now pre-defunct law read, in relevant part [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Wed, 11 Sep 2019 02:19:13 +0000 artappraiser comment 271240 at http://dagblog.com