dagblog - Comments for "You would like to have a beer with her and would also let her babysit your kids!" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/you-would-have-beer-her-and-would-also-let-her-babysit-your-kids-29114 Comments for "You would like to have a beer with her and would also let her babysit your kids!" en Uncovered - Team Trump moves http://dagblog.com/comment/271724#comment-271724 <a id="comment-271724"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/271694#comment-271694">Well, a lot of shit went down</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Uncovered - Team Trump moves incriminating records to non-obvious networks:</p> <p>Rose Mary Woods is all grown up now.</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">New: The whistleblower complaint alleges a pattern of obfuscation at the White House, in which officials moved the records of some of Trump’s communications with foreign officials onto a separate computer network from where they are normally stored. <a href="https://t.co/JrPGM4ATs2">https://t.co/JrPGM4ATs2</a></p> — Shane Harris (@shaneharris) <a href="https://twitter.com/shaneharris/status/1177086946985820161?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 26, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Sep 2019 06:46:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 271724 at http://dagblog.com I think we all have our http://dagblog.com/comment/271709#comment-271709 <a id="comment-271709"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/271707#comment-271707">You have a shtick?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think we all have our shticks here. Those particular areas that tend to trigger a response. One of my pet peeves is not so much polling but poorly designed questions that don't give much useful information. Like the question about Trump being blocked by democrats. I'd bet a large part of the majority were democrats saying Fuck yeah, and high fiving. Or Hal constantly posting polls about how a large majority love Sanders Medicare for all plan when the moment it's explained that it bans all private insurance and employer based insurance support drops like a stone.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:31:33 +0000 ocean-kat comment 271709 at http://dagblog.com You have a shtick? http://dagblog.com/comment/271707#comment-271707 <a id="comment-271707"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/271699#comment-271699">Yes but even a year later</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You have a shtick?</p> <p>I would add that even when the polls are accurate, public opinion is a crude measure of political influence. Joe Congressman doesn't really care about national opinion. He cares about his donors' opinions and his constituency's opinions.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:09:20 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 271707 at http://dagblog.com Yeah. History clearly shows http://dagblog.com/comment/271703#comment-271703 <a id="comment-271703"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/271700#comment-271700">Maggie Haberman surprisingly</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah. History clearly shows that public opinion can change quickly and dramatically, so we should avoid the misconception that today's polls determine tomorrow's. But history is much less clear about how and why public opinion changes, so we also shouldn't assume that it will change in a predictable way.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Sep 2019 02:39:44 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 271703 at http://dagblog.com Maggie Haberman surprisingly http://dagblog.com/comment/271700#comment-271700 <a id="comment-271700"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/271681#comment-271681">I have no strong opinion</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maggie Haberman surprisingly just offered an opinion on topic! Is odd, because she doesn't often go there:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Public opinion isn't "with" Trump. It just happens not to be "with" impeachment at the moment. If you think the Lewandowski hearing was a turning point that helped Democrats, I would argue that TV is not always what folks think it will be.</p> — Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) <a href="https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1177049259570540545?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 26, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Sep 2019 02:30:12 +0000 artappraiser comment 271700 at http://dagblog.com Yes but even a year later http://dagblog.com/comment/271699#comment-271699 <a id="comment-271699"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/271694#comment-271694">Well, a lot of shit went down</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes but<a href="https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/09/25/how-the-watergate-crisis-eroded-public-support-for-richard-nixon/"> even a year later </a>support for impeachment was a bit below 50%. It didn't rise above 50% until a month before he resigned. I only cited that '73 poll because it was the first one I found. As I recall while support rose the majority didn't support impeachment until the very end, and then not by much. It's all part of my shtick here of being critical of polling.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Sep 2019 02:26:13 +0000 ocean-kat comment 271699 at http://dagblog.com Donated to the White http://dagblog.com/comment/271696#comment-271696 <a id="comment-271696"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/271693#comment-271693">Oh crap, that was satire?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Donated to the White Christian <s>Heterosexual</s> Cisgender Gun-Owning Male With No College Degree Defense Fund</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Sep 2019 02:15:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 271696 at http://dagblog.com Well, a lot of shit went down http://dagblog.com/comment/271694#comment-271694 <a id="comment-271694"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/271681#comment-271681">I have no strong opinion</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, a lot of shit went down after that July 1973 poll was taken, including the Saturday Night Massacre, the​ 18.5 minute gap, and the "smoking gun" tape. So I don't think we can credit the impeachment process itself with changing public opinion.</p> <p>Now if the House should uncover an 18.5 minute gap in Trump's phone call transcription, that's another matter.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Sep 2019 02:12:49 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 271694 at http://dagblog.com Oh crap, that was satire? http://dagblog.com/comment/271693#comment-271693 <a id="comment-271693"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/271659#comment-271659">This reminds me of a satire</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oh crap, that was <em>satire</em>? What happened to my money?</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Sep 2019 02:10:46 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 271693 at http://dagblog.com Well, if John McLaughlin http://dagblog.com/comment/271692#comment-271692 <a id="comment-271692"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/271666#comment-271666">Just saw this as to that </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, if <a href="https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/vb9jgb/trump-fired-three-pollsters-but-kept-the-one-who-keeps-telling-him-hes-winning">John McLaughlin</a> polled it, it must be true</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Sep 2019 02:02:03 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 271692 at http://dagblog.com