dagblog - Comments for "Senate Impeachment Trial: no pocket veto!!!" http://dagblog.com/link/senate-impeachment-trial-no-pocket-veto-29171 Comments for "Senate Impeachment Trial: no pocket veto!!!" en Justin Amash on McCarthy http://dagblog.com/comment/271928#comment-271928 <a id="comment-271928"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/271907#comment-271907">Political journos analyzing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Justin Amash on McCarthy appearance:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Kevin McCarthy again displays his unique brand of incompetence and dishonesty. <a href="https://t.co/KAijpPMk6R">pic.twitter.com/KAijpPMk6R</a></p> — Justin Amash (@justinamash) <a href="https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/1178494337031823360?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 30, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 30 Sep 2019 04:34:00 +0000 artappraiser comment 271928 at http://dagblog.com Political journos analyzing http://dagblog.com/comment/271907#comment-271907 <a id="comment-271907"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/senate-impeachment-trial-no-pocket-veto-29171">Senate Impeachment Trial: no pocket veto!!!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Political journos analyzing as regards Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy on 60 Minutes tonight:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">“These are the White House talking points that were emailed to the Congress earlier this week.” <a href="https://t.co/52IbmCi9pI">https://t.co/52IbmCi9pI</a></p> — Josh Dawsey (@jdawsey1) <a href="https://twitter.com/jdawsey1/status/1178467491091271680?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 30, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:42:08 +0000 artappraiser comment 271907 at http://dagblog.com Another factor is that http://dagblog.com/comment/271884#comment-271884 <a id="comment-271884"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/271878#comment-271878">Strikes me that this is why</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Another factor is that narrowing the focus of the charges allows a way out of larger circles of incrimination.</p> <p>For the time being, much information is being sequestered behind the firewall of executive privilege with Barr actively damming the river. If that dam were to break, many GOP secret dealings would be revealed at the same time.</p> <p>The whistleblower has offered an exit strategy for them to act against Trump before the worst is revealed.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 29 Sep 2019 21:19:04 +0000 moat comment 271884 at http://dagblog.com Strikes me that this is why http://dagblog.com/comment/271878#comment-271878 <a id="comment-271878"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/271859#comment-271859">&quot;McConnell could call a vote</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Strikes me that this is why the Dems have to make sure it is a really big shew, with a clear simple narrative, Ed Sullivan style, that a lot of the country will be watching.</p> <p>He gets away with doing what he does because it's just not that common for people to pay attention to what Congress is doing. It's got to be a kabuki show, and then he can't get away with it.</p> <p>(Comes to mind John McCain got how to play this whole thing with his game-changing vote on Obamacare. He knew plenty of people were watching that one.)</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 29 Sep 2019 20:11:54 +0000 artappraiser comment 271878 at http://dagblog.com It's one thing to just deep http://dagblog.com/comment/271862#comment-271862 <a id="comment-271862"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/271859#comment-271859">&quot;McConnell could call a vote</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's one thing to just deep-six it - quite another to call a vote.<br /> Even if they can kind of hid their vote, voters in their districts will have their revenge.<br /> So even a motion to dismiss should garner much more support than the lockstep GOP backing Trump currently.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:22:08 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 271862 at http://dagblog.com "McConnell could call a vote http://dagblog.com/comment/271859#comment-271859 <a id="comment-271859"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/senate-impeachment-trial-no-pocket-veto-29171">Senate Impeachment Trial: no pocket veto!!!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"McConnell could call a vote on a motion to dismiss.."</p> <p>Instead of never starting, McConnell could end the "trial" in minutes, passing it off as a partisan witch hunt, and what about Biden taking billions out of China, and the Clinton Foundation?</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 29 Sep 2019 15:24:54 +0000 NCD comment 271859 at http://dagblog.com