dagblog - Comments for "In the Land of Self-Defeat" http://dagblog.com/link/land-self-defeat-29232 Comments for "In the Land of Self-Defeat" en I don't know how Booker plays http://dagblog.com/comment/272197#comment-272197 <a id="comment-272197"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272196#comment-272196">From what I see, Booker&#039;s 2nd</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't know how Booker plays with the common people. I'm not a common person. But he's 2nd worse to Biden imo. He's just not old. Maybe people want a bipartisan president who will bring civility and compromise back to Washington but I think that's a pipe dream. I want a president that will do whatever it takes to get as much accomplished as is possible if democrats get power. I want only whatever compromise it takes to get it done. If we can do it without any compromise, so much the better. </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 07 Oct 2019 20:23:12 +0000 ocean-kat comment 272197 at http://dagblog.com From what I see, Booker's 2nd http://dagblog.com/comment/272196#comment-272196 <a id="comment-272196"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272194#comment-272194">Kamala Harris would be a good</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>From what I see, Booker's 2nd best compared to Bernie, Joe &amp; Warren for their various strengths, though he's possibly the best all around candidate. But "finishes 2nd most of the time" doesn't win presidencies. If 1 or 2 drop out, his star may rise.</p> <p>Oh, did Huffpost just say much the same thing? I'm so clever...</p> <p><a href="https://www.huffpost.com/entry/cory-booker-voters-2020-election_n_5d76acafe4b0752102312854">https://www.huffpost.com/entry/cory-booker-voters-2020-election_n_5d76ac...</a></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 07 Oct 2019 19:33:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 272196 at http://dagblog.com Kamala Harris would be a good http://dagblog.com/comment/272194#comment-272194 <a id="comment-272194"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272178#comment-272178">here&#039;s the &quot;black church lady</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Kamala Harris would be a good Attorney General candidate. Eric Holder had the baggage of sentencing people for marijuana use when he was a judge, so Harris may still be a viable option. Both Harris and Booker suffer because black voters don't think white voters are ready for another black President. If she tanks in both of the early white states, she will be toast in South Carolina, just like Booker.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:53:43 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 272194 at http://dagblog.com here's the "black church lady http://dagblog.com/comment/272178#comment-272178 <a id="comment-272178"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272175#comment-272175">Let me be clear that I don&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>here's the "black church lady" contingent:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Harris heard from several CBC members who endorsed her after debate one that they felt her exhange with Biden crossed a line<a href="https://t.co/zlKkOqKWds">https://t.co/zlKkOqKWds</a></p> — Steadman™ (@AsteadWesley) <a href="https://twitter.com/AsteadWesley/status/1180896911970070528?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 6, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>mho, they have certain things in common with "Reagan Dems" and they tend to want moderate Dems. Don't know how urban/rural works here, though. I can certainly see some more rural and/or older blacks disliking Kamala Harris' style, that's for sure.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 06 Oct 2019 17:42:19 +0000 artappraiser comment 272178 at http://dagblog.com This is not an area where I http://dagblog.com/comment/272177#comment-272177 <a id="comment-272177"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272175#comment-272175">Let me be clear that I don&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This is not an area where I feel any competence at all to be spouting off. But I just want to point out that Hillary won by almost 3 million votes and 2 percentage points. Despite the fact that she carried a lot of negative baggage that had accumulated over decades.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 06 Oct 2019 17:38:08 +0000 ocean-kat comment 272177 at http://dagblog.com Let me be clear that I don't http://dagblog.com/comment/272175#comment-272175 <a id="comment-272175"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272173#comment-272173">Assuming Bernie&#039;s out within</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Let me be clear that I don't know if the candidate needs these "Reagan Dem" people to win anymore. I haven't studied the voting demographic that well, but judging from the miid terms, the suburban swings who hate Trump might be enough. But to govern? Ah there's the rub. How to lower the level of divisiveness, can't hurt to have someone seen as a centrist with Trump still around, and he still will be around unless he dies. Helpful to have someone who knows how to handle trolling, too. Is all I was thinking.</p> <p>Should be said that Warren tries real hard to win over this type, with: government <em>can</em> help, we can fix this, it's just t that nobody has tackled the rigged system.  Maybe she can do enough of it.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 06 Oct 2019 17:31:09 +0000 artappraiser comment 272175 at http://dagblog.com Assuming Bernie's out within http://dagblog.com/comment/272173#comment-272173 <a id="comment-272173"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272169#comment-272169">I was thinking the same thing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Assuming Bernie's out within 2 months, and Biden's a bit hobbled by this scandal, there'll be a new set of contenders.<br /> (note: Bernie's heart attack probably doesn't help any of the older candidates, at least if he drops out - suddenly people are reminded age is a gravity they can't deny. Combine that with more attention to Hunter, &amp; Biden's good guy image can lose some sheen.)</p> <p>Oddly I see Cory Booker as the new sincere younger old white man to Biden - unable to get enough oxygen while Joe was still around, but forceful as that reassuring nice guy who can get along with most anyone.That he's black seems to have largely been ignored til now. Which could mean he can have it both ways, a bit like Obama, but I think it will be easier for him.</p> <p>Warren has been "reasonable", but I think without Bernie running to her left, &amp; her soaking up some of his big ideas, she'll have a tougher time - though in primary season, the left always blazes away at the pack, and if she's the farthest to the left yet still likable with good economy chops for the left-center, it might simplify her path to the nomination, at which point her election in the generals changes the whole dynamic.</p> <p>I don't know where Kamala Harris fits into all this - I still don't feel her as having enough depth for this year's run, but I'm not paying that close of attention.</p> <p>Yang gets some flurries of excitement, but i don't think he's sophisticated or wily enough to present himself - a bit of a Gomer Pyle aw shucks that kind of kills the deal, despite having some interesting experience &amp; ideas.</p> <p>I'm also thinking Tom Steyer will have a much bigger effect once he's seriously in front of people - having big pockets to now push the ideas he's successfully backed through advocacy these last years.</p> <p>Tulsi Gabbard? everyone thinks she's a Russia-supported shill. No chance.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 06 Oct 2019 16:47:55 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 272173 at http://dagblog.com I was thinking the same thing http://dagblog.com/comment/272169#comment-272169 <a id="comment-272169"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272166#comment-272166">Warren&#039;s 22+plans will be a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I was thinking the same thing. And also thinking: this is why Trump fears Biden. Biden can attract some of these people, he knows how to do "third way" with what we used to call "Reagan Dems".</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 06 Oct 2019 15:44:57 +0000 artappraiser comment 272169 at http://dagblog.com Warren's 22+plans will be a http://dagblog.com/comment/272166#comment-272166 <a id="comment-272166"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272165#comment-272165">Potts conclusion after a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Warren's 22+plans will be a negative, they view government as evil.  Even if they are on one or more of the plethora of federal safety net/retirement programs, which in many rural counties, is around half the population.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 06 Oct 2019 15:15:35 +0000 NCD comment 272166 at http://dagblog.com Potts conclusion after a http://dagblog.com/comment/272165#comment-272165 <a id="comment-272165"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/land-self-defeat-29232">In the Land of Self-Defeat</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Potts conclusion after a detailed narrative and explanation:</p> <blockquote> <p>As long as Democrats make promises to make their lives better with free college and Medicare for all sound like they include government spending, these voters will turn to Trump again — and it won’t matter how many scandals he’s been tarnished by.</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sun, 06 Oct 2019 14:37:14 +0000 artappraiser comment 272165 at http://dagblog.com