dagblog - Comments for "Would You Share Your Views of Donald Trump Over Dinner?" http://dagblog.com/link/would-you-share-your-views-donald-trump-over-dinner-29448 Comments for "Would You Share Your Views of Donald Trump Over Dinner?" en Judicial Watch?!!! PUHLEEZ, http://dagblog.com/comment/272989#comment-272989 <a id="comment-272989"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272985#comment-272985">Parroting debunked false</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>Judicial Watch?!!! </em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Watch">PUHLEEZ</a>, what a joke, I thought you had a brain. It's a political propaganda pushing organization, as wikipedia notes<em>: Courts have dismissed the vast majority of its lawsuits</em></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 03 Nov 2019 03:04:52 +0000 artappraiser comment 272989 at http://dagblog.com Ask yourself, what would http://dagblog.com/comment/272988#comment-272988 <a id="comment-272988"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272986#comment-272986">Keep it up - I&#039;ll start</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ask yourself, what would Nunes do?</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 03 Nov 2019 01:27:17 +0000 moat comment 272988 at http://dagblog.com Keep it up - I'll start http://dagblog.com/comment/272986#comment-272986 <a id="comment-272986"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272985#comment-272985">Parroting debunked false</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Keep it up - I'll start deleting soon.</p> <p>Note I asked specific questions - you answered none, just threw out usual smear. Finished playing with you.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Nov 2019 20:23:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 272986 at http://dagblog.com Loyalist White House staff http://dagblog.com/comment/272984#comment-272984 <a id="comment-272984"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/would-you-share-your-views-donald-trump-over-dinner-29448">Would You Share Your Views of Donald Trump Over Dinner?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Loyalist Executive branch staff show intent to start them spouting agitprop at a young age:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">“Horrified. We were horrified,” said a person who was there and requested anonymity to avoid professional retaliation. <a href="https://t.co/X34ubBCRCf">https://t.co/X34ubBCRCf</a></p> — southpaw (@nycsouthpaw) <a href="https://twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/1190688018648186880?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 2, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>If successful, kids would not end up being that good at following formal debate rules much less social conversation?</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Nov 2019 19:22:47 +0000 artappraiser comment 272984 at http://dagblog.com Parroting debunked false http://dagblog.com/comment/272985#comment-272985 <a id="comment-272985"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272972#comment-272972">Peter,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Parroting debunked false narratives and ignoring real evidence will not bring you happiness  unless you are a fan of Goebbels, NK or East Germany! Ukraine has already convicted one of their politicians for interfering  in the 2016 US election by colluding with the DNC against Manafort and Trump, as reported on by Politico. </p> <p>The wheels of justice move slowly but if you saw Clapper twitching like a lizard on a hot rock when questioned about the Spygate criminal probe a few days ago you'd see that time is running out for this corrupt cabal.Even that lovely so called whistleblower AKA 'Charlie' was directly involved with the players in the DNC's Ukraine operation. </p> <p>This is a complicated even Byzantine story that began long before Trump ran for the presidency and liberals have difficulty digesting anything more complex than Orange Man Bad. Fortunately for the rest of us the Spygate cabal was a gaggle of arrogant morons who left a huge paper trail. Facing much resistance from the eep state, even now, Judicial Watch, who discovered Thee Red Queen's illegal server, continue to print reams of documentary evidence about Spygate.  </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Nov 2019 19:21:47 +0000 Peter comment 272985 at http://dagblog.com I think it's obvious that if http://dagblog.com/comment/272981#comment-272981 <a id="comment-272981"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272972#comment-272972">Peter,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think it's obvious that if Clinton had withheld 500 million in aid and used it to try to extort some country into investigating Dole, or Bush, or if Obama had tried to do it to Romney the republicans would have impeached and enough democrats would have joined them to convict. I no longer have any interest in what kind of spin Trump supporters will use to try to make that ok.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:39:21 +0000 ocean-kat comment 272981 at http://dagblog.com Peter, http://dagblog.com/comment/272972#comment-272972 <a id="comment-272972"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272971#comment-272971">The UK, Italy and Australia</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Peter,</p> <p>1) is it a crime to hold up $400million in aid allocated by Congress by putting conditions on that aid not expressed by Congress without telling Congress, and indeed hiding it from Congress? (Constitutional power of the purse)</p> <p>2) if those conditions are to find dirt on a political opponent not in government, does that make the crime worse?</p> <p>3) is it a crime to lie about 1 &amp; 2 to Congress and provide falsified records of 1 &amp; 2?</p> <p>4) Is it a crime to block Congress from investigating what happened to its money?</p> <p>5) by what standards can Giuliani simultaneously act as "Trump's personal lawyer", an assistant to Barr for official government purposes in negotiating with foreign governments, a private lobbyist for various private energy &amp; other interests, an "employer" of other shady lobbyists but somehow *paid* by those employees, all without holding any security clearance not official US position nor declaring these conflicts of interest?</p> <p>6) Is it a crime to pressure a foreign state with withholding Congressionally mandated aid until foreign state suppresses criminal evidence (Manafort's Ukrainian pay records) that could implicate one's campaign manager in a US criminal trial and in effect and by extension oneself?</p> <p>Straight answers please.</p> <p>Bonus</p> <p>7) if one of Rudy's (and Trump's/Barr's apparently) cronies/"employee"/money source says freely and openly he's tied to the Russian mob, is that worth being shocked at and worth investigating? Does that reflect poorly on the President in any way?</p> <p><img alt="" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EIVCpJ8XkAI5Pjo?format=png&amp;name=large" width="420" /></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Nov 2019 05:51:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 272972 at http://dagblog.com The UK, Italy and Australia http://dagblog.com/comment/272971#comment-272971 <a id="comment-272971"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272954#comment-272954">One British official with</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The UK, Italy and Australia are cooperating with Barr and Durham's criminal investigation because they know some of their people were complicit in the crimes of Spygate. Those people involved and their cronies, as expected, are sandbagging and deflecting through media and opinion lackeys. </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Nov 2019 04:57:58 +0000 Peter comment 272971 at http://dagblog.com I've never met or read a http://dagblog.com/comment/272969#comment-272969 <a id="comment-272969"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/would-you-share-your-views-donald-trump-over-dinner-29448">Would You Share Your Views of Donald Trump Over Dinner?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I've never met or read a Trump supporter that wasn't ignorant and/or what they thought they knew was factually incorrect. I have little to mostly no interest in discussing politics with ignorant people. Let's face reality. The average SAT score is 1050. That's the average, not what those on the low end get. I'd bet everyone here scored substantially better than average. And we took it when it was more difficult. That's just one simple example that people aren't very smart and they mostly don't use the little intelligence they have to learn or study. Trump supporters are stupid and ignorant, or they're part of the con to use the stupid and ignorant to get their taxes lowered.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Nov 2019 04:52:44 +0000 ocean-kat comment 272969 at http://dagblog.com Albuquerque has a Dem mayor  http://dagblog.com/comment/272968#comment-272968 <a id="comment-272968"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272948#comment-272948">You are funny. Are you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Albuquerque has a Dem mayor  now who would never make this kind of pathetic demand of another dem. The Secret Service has a limited budget and has never agreed to cover these supposed costs for any President which you should know. They do spend millions around the country on these trips on fees , hotels, food, fuel and other economic pluses for the local economy.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Nov 2019 04:46:11 +0000 Peter comment 272968 at http://dagblog.com