dagblog - Comments for "HealthBeware for All: Warren pitches $21trillion high" http://dagblog.com/link/healthbeware-all-warren-pitches-21trillion-high-29449 Comments for "HealthBeware for All: Warren pitches $21trillion high" en Sleep-deprived, but a post on http://dagblog.com/comment/273139#comment-273139 <a id="comment-273139"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/healthbeware-all-warren-pitches-21trillion-high-29449">HealthBeware for All: Warren pitches $21trillion high</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Sleep-deprived, but a post on Warren's Medicare for All plan, with why I think a plan is necessary tactically.<br /><br /> I haven't seen people note her Employer Contribution smartly fights monopsony, keeping bosses and owners from eating all the surplus post-M4A. <a href="https://t.co/58X7OQIZYd">https://t.co/58X7OQIZYd</a></p> — Mike Konczal (@rortybomb) <a href="https://twitter.com/rortybomb/status/1191893112626528256?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 6, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 06 Nov 2019 04:43:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 273139 at http://dagblog.com Biden campaign running with http://dagblog.com/comment/272983#comment-272983 <a id="comment-272983"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272973#comment-272973">She certainly does offense</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Biden campaign running with that:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">No more whispers of "Warren used to be a Republican" from the Biden team. Here's <a href="https://twitter.com/schultzohio?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@schultzohio</a> bringing it up in response to Warren's suggestion that Biden is "running in the wrong presidential primary." <a href="https://t.co/rzwzEgNohS">pic.twitter.com/rzwzEgNohS</a></p> — Jennifer Epstein (@jeneps) <a href="https://twitter.com/jeneps/status/1190391151712514048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Nov 2019 19:16:07 +0000 artappraiser comment 272983 at http://dagblog.com I didn't say she doesn't do http://dagblog.com/comment/272979#comment-272979 <a id="comment-272979"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272973#comment-272973">She certainly does offense</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I didn't say she doesn't do offense - I said she sux at it.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Nov 2019 09:01:13 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 272979 at http://dagblog.com She certainly does offense http://dagblog.com/comment/272973#comment-272973 <a id="comment-272973"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272970#comment-272970">Except Warren is great on </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>She certainly does offense against other Democrats.</p> <p> Her plan starts with personal family stories, and is full of personal pronouns, "I"s, "my"s, "my plan", "I have", 15 pages long.  It's not on her website, which mainly has videos of her. Only at NPR in small window. She spends a paragraph attacking other Democrats in the plan with "my plan beats yours, if you're honest, you'll admit yours sucks".</p> <p> It has the usual "we spend twice as much for healthcare, but are sicker" than every other major nation. No explanation of why that is, and how whatever caused it will disappear because she has "a plan."</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Nov 2019 06:11:19 +0000 NCD comment 272973 at http://dagblog.com Except Warren is great on http://dagblog.com/comment/272970#comment-272970 <a id="comment-272970"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272960#comment-272960">You&#039;ve hit on it. &quot;We need</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Except Warren is great on *defense*. She just sux on offense.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Nov 2019 04:56:04 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 272970 at http://dagblog.com That's what really really http://dagblog.com/comment/272965#comment-272965 <a id="comment-272965"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272960#comment-272960">You&#039;ve hit on it. &quot;We need</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's what really really bothered me about people fainting in crowds for Obama when he was starting to gain steam in the primary. And how some of the Obamabots acted on TPMCafe, as if he were god. There was one guy who used to post audio and then just the word "Here's Obama! LISTEN!" The savior thing.</p> <p>Thank god he turned out to be humble.</p> <p>(Mom taught him right? You are never going to be king of the world, buster. I read somewhere he said she called him that, "buster", about doing his homework in Indonesia. <img alt="laugh" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/teeth_smile.png" title="laugh" width="23" />)</p> <p>Can I just say: it's okay if they have some natural charm in order to manage people better. But not this god-savior-rock star-he/she can do no wrong shit.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Nov 2019 03:44:51 +0000 artappraiser comment 272965 at http://dagblog.com You've hit on it. "We need http://dagblog.com/comment/272960#comment-272960 <a id="comment-272960"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272949#comment-272949">I like these three words,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You've hit on it.<em> "We need the boring kind of elections that EU members used to hold: competent technocrat A, technocrat B, technocrat C, them's your choices."</em></p> <p>I'm not a both siderist, but Warren and Trump represent the same "heroic mission" ideology to their fanatical supporters. It is the opposite of your 'technocrats" who are the ones we need. It may, eventually, represent the end state of a failed democracy.</p> <p>Trump "Only I can fix it!"</p> <p>Warren "Only I have a plan to fix it!"</p> <p>The fact that Warren has actual (thousands of words) plans and Trump has a big mouth makes little difference. Neither can do it on their own, Warren is a Ivy league wonks Trump.</p> <p>The supporters of both see them as the<em> </em>political messiah, who, alone, will bring on the new age. That is authoritarianism. It disrespects other points of view, like Warren's attacks on Biden today, and Trump's attacks on "Never Trumpers".</p> <p>Warren and Trump both fit the description of<em> "charismatic authority"</em>, which "cannot coexist with...the ideal modern state system".</p> <blockquote> <p>The main features of rule by 'charismatic authority'  consists of a proclaimed heroic 'mission' and the presumed greatness of the leader. The personal domination of 'charismatic authority' cannot coexist with an impersonal, functional legal-rational exercise of power which lies at the foundation of the ideal modern state system.....Such authority cannot become 'systematized' without losing it's charismatic edge....</p> <p>From Economy and Society, posthumously published in 1923, Max Weber.</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Nov 2019 00:45:01 +0000 NCD comment 272960 at http://dagblog.com Don't get me wrong, I *like* http://dagblog.com/comment/272953#comment-272953 <a id="comment-272953"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272950#comment-272950">Interestingly, Warren</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Don't get me wrong, I *like* Suicide Club - just not sure Margot Robbie will be president this cycle. But geez we could use that bat in the Oval Office. (and no Nats/Astros references please)</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 01 Nov 2019 23:41:29 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 272953 at http://dagblog.com He likes it!  http://dagblog.com/comment/272952#comment-272952 <a id="comment-272952"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/healthbeware-all-warren-pitches-21trillion-high-29449">HealthBeware for All: Warren pitches $21trillion high</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>He likes it! <img alt="surprise" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/omg_smile.png" title="surprise" width="23" /></p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Elizabeth Warren finally has a plan to pay for Medicare for All. <a href="https://twitter.com/Noahpinion?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Noahpinion</a> says it's about as good as it gets <a href="https://t.co/JiENFj2etQ">https://t.co/JiENFj2etQ</a></p> — Bloomberg Opinion (@bopinion) <a href="https://twitter.com/bopinion/status/1190413176283811845?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 01 Nov 2019 23:32:30 +0000 artappraiser comment 272952 at http://dagblog.com She is apparently running for http://dagblog.com/comment/272951#comment-272951 <a id="comment-272951"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/272950#comment-272950">Interestingly, Warren</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>She is apparently running for President of progressive twitter.  </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 01 Nov 2019 23:27:26 +0000 NCD comment 272951 at http://dagblog.com