dagblog - Comments for "&quot;Ok Boomer&quot;" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/ok-boomer-29456 Comments for ""Ok Boomer"" en Ralph needs to get with the http://dagblog.com/comment/279272#comment-279272 <a id="comment-279272"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/279268#comment-279268">Bloomberg economic columnist</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ralph needs to get with the <em>de facto</em> MMT program that (sloppily and without transparency) is QE fill-in-the-number.</p> <p> </p> <p>The idea that you are going to pay a sovereign half a point or more to store your cash is only logical, when you ask what it would cost to insure a billion in Benjamins kept in your cellar.  Add overhead for the kinda safe that you would prudently purchase on top of the insurance..</p> <p> </p> <p>We should just mint the fuckin' platinum proof Trillion already, and zoom off into the new world where the Repugnants can't kneecap progress by waving the bloody flag of (meaningless) deficits.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Apr 2020 09:49:57 +0000 jollyroger comment 279272 at http://dagblog.com Bloomberg economic columnist http://dagblog.com/comment/279268#comment-279268 <a id="comment-279268"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/ok-boomer-29456">&quot;Ok Boomer&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Bloomberg economic columnist Noah Smith retweeted this:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The belief that you should be able to make lots of money indefinitely just by leaving it in a savings account is one of the weirdest Baby Boomer pieties<a href="https://t.co/6eWvSOZY7Y">https://t.co/6eWvSOZY7Y</a></p> — dylan matthews (@dylanmatt) <a href="https://twitter.com/dylanmatt/status/1247600446442799105?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 7, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Apr 2020 07:12:01 +0000 artappraiser comment 279268 at http://dagblog.com "OK, Boomer" made its first http://dagblog.com/comment/275273#comment-275273 <a id="comment-275273"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/ok-boomer-29456">&quot;Ok Boomer&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">"OK, Boomer" made its first appearance in the Supreme Court Wednesday, invoked by baby boomer Chief Justice John Roberts 12 days before he turns 65.<a href="https://t.co/mKd0abpTOh">https://t.co/mKd0abpTOh</a></p> — Ben Pu (@BenPu_nbc) <a href="https://twitter.com/BenPu_nbc/status/1217533703074664454?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 15, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 15 Jan 2020 23:02:35 +0000 artappraiser comment 275273 at http://dagblog.com Gen X, meanwhile, forever in http://dagblog.com/comment/275105#comment-275105 <a id="comment-275105"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/ok-boomer-29456">&quot;Ok Boomer&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Gen X, meanwhile: forever in existential pain. ​Ginia Bellafante to Elizabeth Wurtzel:</p> <p> <em>I will miss you Elizabeth Wurtzel. Goodbye</em>. <em>May the afterlife spare you the Influencer.</em></p> <p>in <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/10/nyregion/elizabeth-wurtzel-gen-x.html"><strong><em>Elizabeth Wurtzel and the Illusion of Gen-X Success</em></strong></a></p> <p><em>“Prozac Nation” seemed to herald a boundless future for young creatives. It was actually the beginning of the end</em>.</p> <p>@ NYTimes.com, Jan. 10</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 11 Jan 2020 06:31:23 +0000 artappraiser comment 275105 at http://dagblog.com Snooze-a-thon. The original http://dagblog.com/comment/274740#comment-274740 <a id="comment-274740"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274737#comment-274737">These kids are all right,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Snooze-a-thon. The original Schhol of Rock:</p> <p><a href="https://youtu.be/ZoZBI52KmDo">https://youtu.be/ZoZBI52KmDo</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Jan 2020 04:11:37 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 274740 at http://dagblog.com These kids are all right, http://dagblog.com/comment/274737#comment-274737 <a id="comment-274737"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/ok-boomer-29456">&quot;Ok Boomer&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>These kids are all right, they get it:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="560px"><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/GlG-vN8i9Qc" width="560px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Jan 2020 02:12:00 +0000 artappraiser comment 274737 at http://dagblog.com Ok boomer Kasparov: http://dagblog.com/comment/274668#comment-274668 <a id="comment-274668"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274575#comment-274575">I do realize it&#039;s tiresome to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ok boomer Kasparov:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">It's nice they have opinions about communism now, because once you're living in it you don't get to have an opinion about it anymore. <a href="https://t.co/YjFFwFxSFj">https://t.co/YjFFwFxSFj</a></p> — Garry Kasparov (@Kasparov63) <a href="https://twitter.com/Kasparov63/status/1211724859950153739?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 31 Dec 2019 06:40:32 +0000 artappraiser comment 274668 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, socialism isn't clearly http://dagblog.com/comment/274583#comment-274583 <a id="comment-274583"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274576#comment-274576">I&#039;m pretty sure most people</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, socialism isn't clearly defined and for many it could just mean a robust social safety net and other government services. Communism is more seen as an economic system with government seizing the levers of production and is significantly less favorable.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 29 Dec 2019 01:09:33 +0000 ocean-kat comment 274583 at http://dagblog.com I'm pretty sure most people http://dagblog.com/comment/274576#comment-274576 <a id="comment-274576"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274575#comment-274575">I do realize it&#039;s tiresome to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm pretty sure most people couldn't follow a Communist propaganda thread anymore. Soak the rich, fine, but seize the levers of production? Lumpenproletariat shit? Forget it. Just show us the money.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Dec 2019 23:52:06 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 274576 at http://dagblog.com I do realize it's tiresome to http://dagblog.com/comment/274575#comment-274575 <a id="comment-274575"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/ok-boomer-29456">&quot;Ok Boomer&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I do realize it's tiresome to hear, but nonetheless<em> boomers basically been there, done that:</em></p> <p><a href="https://www.marketwatch.com/story/for-millennials-socialism-and-communism-are-hot-capitalism-is-not-2019-10-28">More than a third of millennials polled approve of communism</a></p> <p><em>Biggest threat to world peace? 27% named President Trump, 22% said Kim Jong-Un, and 15% tapped Vladimir Putin</em></p> <p>By Shawn Langlois ​@ Marketwatch.com, Nov. 2</p> <blockquote> <p>Somewhere, Bernie Sanders is smiling.</p> <p>A new survey released by the Washington, D.C., nonprofit Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation reflects that, if the younger generation gets out and votes in 2020, those running for office on the far left have reason to be hopeful.</p> <p>According to YouGov, which conducted the poll, capitalism, amid a widening divide between the haves and have-nots, has plunged in popularity from a year ago, with one out of every two millennials — ages 23 to 38 — supporting it.</p> <p>Meanwhile, 36% of millennials polled say that they approve of communism, which is up significantly from 28% in 2018.</p> <p><img alt="" height="331" src="https://ei.marketwatch.com/Multimedia/2019/10/28/Photos/NS/MW-HU114_social_20191028101302_NS.jpg?uuid=0d7edf7c-f98d-11e9-992b-9c8e992d421e" style="float:left" width="400" /></p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>Socialism, a dirty word to the president and many of his supporters, has shown a decrease in favorability in all age groups except the Silent Generation (age 74+) and millennials, of which 70% say they’d be likely to vote for a socialist candidate.</p> <p>Marion Smith, executive director of the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, says he’s troubled by the findings of the poll [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Dec 2019 23:46:47 +0000 artappraiser comment 274575 at http://dagblog.com