dagblog - Comments for "Warren Already Losing Swing States to Trump" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/warren-losing-swing-states-trump-already-29472 Comments for "Warren Already Losing Swing States to Trump" en This is incredible: 59% of http://dagblog.com/comment/273637#comment-273637 <a id="comment-273637"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/warren-losing-swing-states-trump-already-29472">Warren Already Losing Swing States to Trump</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">This is incredible: 59% of Republican men without a college degree support a wealth tax. Wealth tax polls higher with Republicans than with independents among both men and women? <a href="https://t.co/RctulGH0RT">https://t.co/RctulGH0RT</a></p> — Lee Fang (@lhfang) <a href="https://twitter.com/lhfang/status/1200367457916968961?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 29, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Most progressive, highest revenue raising idea for social programs proposed by mainstream Democrats in a generation, and GOP voters love it. <a href="https://t.co/wP7JHtgREl">pic.twitter.com/wP7JHtgREl</a></p> — Lee Fang (@lhfang) <a href="https://twitter.com/lhfang/status/1200368461114822658?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 29, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 Nov 2019 23:57:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 273637 at http://dagblog.com But "they" want plans: http://dagblog.com/comment/273491#comment-273491 <a id="comment-273491"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/warren-losing-swing-states-trump-already-29472">Warren Already Losing Swing States to Trump</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>But "they" <em>want</em> plans:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Which is why this <a href="https://twitter.com/joshjame?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@joshjame</a> story is essential <a href="https://t.co/7ByBnf9pbg">https://t.co/7ByBnf9pbg</a></p> — Steadman (@AsteadWesley) <a href="https://twitter.com/AsteadWesley/status/1195926959219449857?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 17, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Nov 2019 17:48:27 +0000 artappraiser comment 273491 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, i put that in the news http://dagblog.com/comment/273466#comment-273466 <a id="comment-273466"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/273452#comment-273452">Obama to Liz, chill on border</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, i put that in the news section too, first of all, it's definitely big political news because:it's not exactly traditional for ex-presidents to do this publicly! (Though in private "backroom" days of "primary," might have been more like the rule rather than the exception, if ex-prez was a two-termer that is.)</p> <p>Second, I think fascinating the emphasis on immigration by many advisors, so much so that I suspect the poll numbers on topic that are available to the public are only the half of it. That what a candidate says and does on it is seen as having much much more effect than us plebian commentariat and news fans imagine. That it may be key to Obama/Trump type voters especially, but also a bigger bang than is usually stressed. Along the lines of: too much change, too fast, can't take it anymore.</p> <p>Medicare 4 all: no brainer to make it "Medicare option for all". To the point where: I don't get anyone who really wants to win pounding on Medicare 4 all meme. It appeals to a passionate minority frustrated with health care system and access right now. The minority is correct to be passionate but the majority has not figured that out yet, it's going to be a gradual process cumulating in hellish scenario for the majority including like doctors and nurses on strike can't take it no more. Meantime, here's the way I see it: political candidates who push it are basically volunteering to be sacrificial lambs to educate the public more and faster, including the huge public on employer paid plans, at the risk of losing their elections. And I've read enough on the Warren example to be convinced that that was an error in judgment by her campaign to appeal to the passionistas as to the primary, and they are trying to figure a way out of it. They might still.. it may even be that Obama is trying to assist and has been asked to assist....</p> <p>Likewise with immigration, this is M4all has the "too much change too fast" taint. I know that terminology was used in the past to denigrate progressivism. But people got to let go of that, because every single one of us, if honest with ourselves, is now experiencing the stress and anxiety of "too much change too fast" in one way or another.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 16 Nov 2019 13:23:31 +0000 artappraiser comment 273466 at http://dagblog.com Obama to Liz, chill on border http://dagblog.com/comment/273452#comment-273452 <a id="comment-273452"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/warren-losing-swing-states-trump-already-29472">Warren Already Losing Swing States to Trump</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/15/us/politics/barack-obama-2020-dems.html?action=click&amp;module=Top%20Stories&amp;pgtype=Homepage">Obama</a> to Liz, chill on border and M4All.. :</p> <p>"Yet, Obama also raised concerns about some of the liberal ideas being promoted by some candidates, citing health care and immigration as issues where the proposals may have gone further than public opinion."</p> <p>Exactly what was pointed out in this post on her open borders plan, total amnesty for all, and her M4All.  She is now backing off of M4All with a new "100 day" plan for free healthcare for all low income persons, and all families making under 50k. <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/15/us/politics/elizabeth-warren-medicare-for-all-100-days.html">link</a></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 16 Nov 2019 05:35:05 +0000 NCD comment 273452 at http://dagblog.com Yes!  Because we don’t have a http://dagblog.com/comment/273300#comment-273300 <a id="comment-273300"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/273203#comment-273203">Brainfarts troubling you?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes!  Because we don’t have a “like” button.</p> <p>you are so right!</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 10 Nov 2019 01:39:53 +0000 CVille Dem comment 273300 at http://dagblog.com Trump could have won that http://dagblog.com/comment/273246#comment-273246 <a id="comment-273246"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/273235#comment-273235">Trump settled the fraud case</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump could have won that civil case over Trump U and I like how he cut out the bottomfeeder lawyers from the settlement.</p> <p>The misuse of funds in his charity case was also a civil case as you well know that didn't rise to the level of a crime.He improperly borrowed money from the charity but paid it back. </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Nov 2019 04:36:02 +0000 Anonymous comment 273246 at http://dagblog.com “I raise all this by way of http://dagblog.com/comment/273244#comment-273244 <a id="comment-273244"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/273236#comment-273236">I won&#039;t defend Trump&#039;s</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">“I raise all this by way of explanation to the many people wondering how the abundant evidence that not just Stone, but Trump himself, worked to optimize the release of the stolen emails did not get charged.” <a href="https://t.co/ooLKIa5ARo">https://t.co/ooLKIa5ARo</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/emptywheel?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@emptywheel</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Mueller?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Mueller</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Wikileaks?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Wikileaks</a></p> — Seth Hurwitz (@mild7) <a href="https://twitter.com/mild7/status/1192627297930612736?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 8, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Nov 2019 04:17:29 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 273244 at http://dagblog.com Trick of the trade - when http://dagblog.com/comment/273242#comment-273242 <a id="comment-273242"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/273236#comment-273236">I won&#039;t defend Trump&#039;s</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trick of the trade - when your tinfoil hat starts slipping, use regular household clothespins (the old wooden kind) so doesn't interfere with the electromagnetic resonance.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Nov 2019 03:40:41 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 273242 at http://dagblog.com I won't defend Trump's http://dagblog.com/comment/273236#comment-273236 <a id="comment-273236"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/273232#comment-273232">He&#039;s a fraud, he&#039;s paid for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I won't defend Trump's mistakes if they  are true, he's not a golden calf he's human. You can be sure that with his long time enemies such as Mueller and Nadler he would have been charged with any real crime he might have committed. Repeatedly quacking 'fraud' won't change that fact.</p> <p>Manafort appears to have been convicted on the basis of the now debunked Black Ledger so he also may have been framed just as altered documents were used to frame Flynn, Pappadoc was set up for a fall by MIfsud, a probable friendly operative, and others and Mueller still had to use a perjury trap to get him to submit. Stone is facing the wrath of Mueller and his henchmen because they were unable to deliver Trump's head to the resistance. Cohen is a sleaze and is paying for his crimes which have nothing to do with his work for Trump. .</p> <p>If you were truly interested in the real story of Spygate I'd recommend you watch the Dan Bongino Show as millions of people already do. He's been reporting on the evidence as it is uncovered over the last three years and has been proven correct on most of his assumptions and predictions about this convoluted coup plot. That might not be a good recommendation as watching Dan might make your head explode.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Nov 2019 02:24:02 +0000 Anonymous comment 273236 at http://dagblog.com Trump settled the fraud case http://dagblog.com/comment/273235#comment-273235 <a id="comment-273235"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/273231#comment-273231">Trump subjecting you to peace</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump settled the fraud case against his university </p> <p><a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/11/18/reports-trump-nears-settlement-trump-u-fraud-case/94068946/">https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/11/18/reports-trump-nears-settlement-trump-u-fraud-case/94068946/</a></p> <p>Trump admitted to misusing funds in the charity settlement </p> <p><a href="https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/11/donald-trump-ordered-to-pay-2-million-for-charity-fraud/">https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/11/donald-trump-ordered-to-pay-2-million-for-charity-fraud/</a></p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Nov 2019 02:17:42 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 273235 at http://dagblog.com